Rolling over to season 15 at end of day tomorrow. Please renew now before you lose the access!
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > OLD GLB2Scout Tool : RIP March 20
Originally posted by Aeir
Season 14 history not showing up correctly.
categories are there, but no data.
Sorry...
Fookin case sensitivity.... Fixed now, had a "s" in the filename not a "S" lol
Season 14 history not showing up correctly.
categories are there, but no data.
Sorry...
Fookin case sensitivity.... Fixed now, had a "s" in the filename not a "S" lol
td577
offline
offline
I can't even use half of the GLB2 scout tool functions because every time now I log in it requires captcha. Which side of this issue needs to address this?
I should mention it is requiring captcha on the GLB2 side. So when the scout tool asks for information from GLB2 it says it isn't from an authorized user.
I should mention it is requiring captcha on the GLB2 side. So when the scout tool asks for information from GLB2 it says it isn't from an authorized user.
Edited by td577 on Dec 12, 2015 16:38:21
The only time Scout needs to use the GLB2 site for information that requires login is when you import a player or a roster. All the other interaction is purely as an anonymous user.
Are you still having these issues?
Are you still having these issues?
td577
offline
offline
I thought maybe I couldn't import players or roster was because of the GLB2 captcha but it isn't asking for it anymore anyways. Now I can't link my GLB2 account so I think the issues are on the scout tool side. I get this when linking: GLB2 Information is not correct, please confirm login details. They are correct.
What that means is that the username or password don't match. I will look at the code a bit I might not be web encoding the request so that may be the issue. I'll update tonight when I get on for sure.
Major bug fixed: Thanks Xars for finding it.
Big play % was off per play on team scout. Previous calculation was not accounting for equal cases. This has been fixed.
Big play % was off per play on team scout. Previous calculation was not accounting for equal cases. This has been fixed.
Nyria
offline
offline
This may be mentioned somewhere in the thread, but it's too long for me to go through it: The Singleback Big is a two WR formation: Two TE's, but no FB, so two WR.
Your tool treats the Singleback Big as a one WR formation. It's possible the plays selected from the defensive playbook do as well, which would mean your tool is still providing the best info (If so, it's the game that needs to be fixed, as people will be using 4-4 Big or something and ending up covering WR2 with a non-CB. In general, both in real life and in the game, where TE's are more likely to receive well, two TE/no FB is a better passing formation than 2 RB/1 TE/2 WR, so lumping it in with 1 WR formations is a real mistake.)
Anyway, if it's a flaw in the scouting tool, it ought to be fixed so we can use the filter to get the right playbook match. If it's a flaw in the game's defense chooser and the tool is essentially right, I (and I'm sure others) will want to know so we can adjust our offenses to exploit it and our defenses to limit the damage.
It doesn't need a separate category, but should be treated by the game's defense chooser (and if it is, then by your tool) as a 2 WR formation, as I'd been assuming it was.
Your tool treats the Singleback Big as a one WR formation. It's possible the plays selected from the defensive playbook do as well, which would mean your tool is still providing the best info (If so, it's the game that needs to be fixed, as people will be using 4-4 Big or something and ending up covering WR2 with a non-CB. In general, both in real life and in the game, where TE's are more likely to receive well, two TE/no FB is a better passing formation than 2 RB/1 TE/2 WR, so lumping it in with 1 WR formations is a real mistake.)
Anyway, if it's a flaw in the scouting tool, it ought to be fixed so we can use the filter to get the right playbook match. If it's a flaw in the game's defense chooser and the tool is essentially right, I (and I'm sure others) will want to know so we can adjust our offenses to exploit it and our defenses to limit the damage.
It doesn't need a separate category, but should be treated by the game's defense chooser (and if it is, then by your tool) as a 2 WR formation, as I'd been assuming it was.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
