Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Gnosis
Hey Larry, choke on a fat one, you fuckin idiot.



You're eaten up by your anti-Semitism you ignorant prick.

Originally posted by wormser1971
Correct. It is a building that never collapsed. It is WTC building 6. Now tell me again why building 7 could not stand up to a corner being hit with debris, while this one was absolutely gutted and stood until it was later demolished.

Because it was considerably shorter and more stout. WTC 7 is much, much taller, and not much wider. It is already significantly more prone to structural failure.

The WTC 6 damage does bring about another issue. If you guys contend that the buildings were controlled demolitions, why did they fall in such a shitshow, hitting everything around them and demolishing/damaging buildings?

And furthermore, why is WTC 7 so important? Why not concentrate on WTC 6? It was absolutely pulverized, destroying all contents, and it counted ATF, Customs, and the Department of Commerce within it. Seems pretty important imo.

Also, I'm not sure it's accurate to say that building is standing. The front, back, and middle are essentially gone

Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader

You're eaten up by your anti-Semitism you ignorant prick.

i'm starting to think gnosis likes dudes given how frequently he talks about choking on fat ones

Larry and Gnosis as roommates would make for a great buddy sitcom

Originally posted by seths99
Larry and Gnosis as roommates would make for a great buddy sitcom

Add a hot chick they both have a love interest with and a goofy nerdy neighbor who is socially awkward and you have Emmy nominations.

Originally posted by wormser1971
I will do this. I will say that 25% of the people witnessing an event give an accurate description of the event.

You admit the same thing.

Now we can come to 2 conclusions

1)a plane hit the pentagon.
2)bombs went off at the WTC

Now you can get somewhere

Ring around the rosey. That's the name of your game. Make an outlandish statement, like 'a plane didn't hit the Pentagon', then when it is proven wrong you move the goal posts. This brings to mind the saying, 'It is hard to soar like an eagle when you are flying with turkeys.'

Originally posted by wormser1971

You are not reading the dates they made those statements. They are all from 2010 or later.

Eyewitness testimony is only reliable for a short period.

You must do yoga because that was a stretch. Witnessing a plane crash into the Pentagon is something that will stick with you forever.

Originally posted by wormser1971


But, like I said before... Assume that 25% of all testimony is correct. That means a plane hit the pentagon, which I am willing to submit, and bombs went off at the WTC, which you are unwilling to accept.

OK, well at least we got this far, Wormser has admitted that a plane hit the Pentagon. Record this date everyone.

Originally posted by wormser1971


But, like I said before... Assume that 25% of all testimony is correct. That means a plane hit the pentagon, which I am willing to submit, and bombs went off at the WTC, which you are unwilling to accept.

lol, you fucking halfwit. there are thousands of things which could have happened during that event which could have sounded like bombs. There's literally only one thing that can look like a plane flying overhead at that altitude. why are you equating them in terms of testimony?
oh, that's right, because equating them helps fit your little narrative here.

Originally posted by baumusc
OK, well at least we got this far, Wormser has admitted that a plane hit the Pentagon. Record this date everyone.

And it only took a decade or so.

Originally posted by seths99
lol, you fucking halfwit. there are thousands of things which could have happened during that event which could have sounded like bombs. There's literally only one thing that can look like a plane flying overhead at that altitude. why are you equating them in terms of testimony?
oh, that's right, because equating them helps fit your little narrative here.

People that heard explosions aren't eye witnesses either, they are ear witnesses. I want to hear from the eyewitness that actually saw a bomb in the basement explode or saw thermite cutting beams. I have yet to see someone come forward.

Originally posted by seths99
lol, you fucking halfwit. there are thousands of things which could have happened during that event which could have sounded like bombs. There's literally only one thing that can look like a plane flying overhead at that altitude. why are you equating them in terms of testimony?
oh, that's right, because equating them helps fit your little narrative here.

And exactly how many things would have destroyed the lobby long before collapse? Sure, you will try to say it was fire from elevators, but the design of the building would not have allowed that.

You refuse to believe testimony from people in the buildings, but believe people who were near the pentagon.. cool.

Originally posted by baumusc
People that heard explosions aren't eye witnesses either, they are ear witnesses. I want to hear from the eyewitness that actually saw a bomb in the basement explode or saw thermite cutting beams. I have yet to see someone come forward.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2AnDy2zDL8

1;11 man witnessed bombs

1;20 bomb goes off

You will never live in the reality.

2;10 description of bombs

it goes on like that through the whole video. enjoy your denial

.Originally posted by rams78110
Because it was considerably shorter and more stout. WTC 7 is much, much taller, and not much wider. It is already significantly more prone to structural failure.

The WTC 6 damage does bring about another issue. If you guys contend that the buildings were controlled demolitions, why did they fall in such a shitshow, hitting everything around them and demolishing/damaging buildings?

And furthermore, why is WTC 7 so important? Why not concentrate on WTC 6? It was absolutely pulverized, destroying all contents, and it counted ATF, Customs, and the Department of Commerce within it. Seems pretty important imo.

1) Seriously? That's where you're going? WTC 7 collapsed because it was taller... WTF kind of logic is that? They (and that means all engineers including nist) agree that debris had nothing to do with the collapse, so now a tall building on fire will collapse straight down symmetrically. Great. Stay out of buildings forever if you believe that garbage.

2) It was 1,200 feet tall. I think they did a pretty good job keeping it all near the tower.

3) Because it collapsed symmetrically. It fell at free fall. It fell due to fire.

here is what 7 contained
http://www.wtc7.net/background.html