Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God.
Forum > General Discussion > Politics and Religion > Watch the video... then call me a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
Originally posted by baumusc
Nope, pretty much everyone in that video that I posted said they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Try again. That tin foil hat must be thick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
I will do this. I will say that 25% of the people witnessing an event give an accurate description of the event.
You admit the same thing.
Now we can come to 2 conclusions
1)a plane hit the pentagon.
2)bombs went off at the WTC
Now you can get somewhere
Nope, pretty much everyone in that video that I posted said they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Try again. That tin foil hat must be thick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
I will do this. I will say that 25% of the people witnessing an event give an accurate description of the event.
You admit the same thing.
Now we can come to 2 conclusions
1)a plane hit the pentagon.
2)bombs went off at the WTC
Now you can get somewhere
Originally posted by rams78110
That appears to be a building that had another flaming building fall on top of it.
Correct. It is a building that never collapsed. It is WTC building 6. Now tell me again why building 7 could not stand up to a corner being hit with debris, while this one was absolutely gutted and stood until it was later demolished.
That appears to be a building that had another flaming building fall on top of it.
Correct. It is a building that never collapsed. It is WTC building 6. Now tell me again why building 7 could not stand up to a corner being hit with debris, while this one was absolutely gutted and stood until it was later demolished.
Originally posted by seths99
let's think about what would be easier as far as memory manipulation.....hearing 'bombs' go off during that event? or manufacturing a memory of an entire fucking airplane?
I'd look into a refund on that psych degree if I were you
If a person( like those firefighters who reported bombs in the lobby of the tower) reports what they witnessed immediately after an event, it usually has no outside interference and is not subject to false memory implantation. You know that though.
let's think about what would be easier as far as memory manipulation.....hearing 'bombs' go off during that event? or manufacturing a memory of an entire fucking airplane?
I'd look into a refund on that psych degree if I were you
If a person( like those firefighters who reported bombs in the lobby of the tower) reports what they witnessed immediately after an event, it usually has no outside interference and is not subject to false memory implantation. You know that though.
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
AT THE 12:46 MARK YOU CAN SEE BIGFOOT RAPELLING DOWN THE SIDE OF THE NORTH TOWER
Yeah, but Gnosis thinks Bigfoot is wearing a skullcap, so...
AT THE 12:46 MARK YOU CAN SEE BIGFOOT RAPELLING DOWN THE SIDE OF THE NORTH TOWER
Yeah, but Gnosis thinks Bigfoot is wearing a skullcap, so...
I am currently in an e-mail discussion with
http://comm.psu.edu/people/individual/s.-shyam-sundar One of the NIST report personnel. I will let you know what hhis response to some of my questions is later. (assuming he doesn't continue to avoid the hard questions concerning bad assumptions) I encourage you guys to ask some questions yourselves regarding this matter.
Larry... you're just an idiot. Please use your time to gain knowledge in anything at all. Maybe some auto mechanics or something.
http://comm.psu.edu/people/individual/s.-shyam-sundar One of the NIST report personnel. I will let you know what hhis response to some of my questions is later. (assuming he doesn't continue to avoid the hard questions concerning bad assumptions) I encourage you guys to ask some questions yourselves regarding this matter.
Larry... you're just an idiot. Please use your time to gain knowledge in anything at all. Maybe some auto mechanics or something.
Originally posted by baumusc
Nope, pretty much everyone in that video that I posted said they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Try again. That tin foil hat must be thick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
You are not reading the dates they made those statements. They are all from 2010 or later.
Eyewitness testimony is only reliable for a short period.
Originally posted by
Once witnesses state facts in a particular way or identify a particular person as the perpetrator, they are unwilling or even unable—due to the reconstruction of their memory—to reconsider their initial understanding. When a witness identifies a person in a line-up, he is likely to identify that same person in later line-ups, even when the person identified is not the perpetrator. Although juries and decision-makers place great reliance on eyewitness identification, they are often unaware of the danger of false memories.
http://agora.stanford.edu/sjls/Issue%20One/fisher&tversky.htm
But, like I said before... Assume that 25% of all testimony is correct. That means a plane hit the pentagon, which I am willing to submit, and bombs went off at the WTC, which you are unwilling to accept.
Nope, pretty much everyone in that video that I posted said they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Try again. That tin foil hat must be thick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
You are not reading the dates they made those statements. They are all from 2010 or later.
Eyewitness testimony is only reliable for a short period.
Originally posted by
Once witnesses state facts in a particular way or identify a particular person as the perpetrator, they are unwilling or even unable—due to the reconstruction of their memory—to reconsider their initial understanding. When a witness identifies a person in a line-up, he is likely to identify that same person in later line-ups, even when the person identified is not the perpetrator. Although juries and decision-makers place great reliance on eyewitness identification, they are often unaware of the danger of false memories.
http://agora.stanford.edu/sjls/Issue%20One/fisher&tversky.htm
But, like I said before... Assume that 25% of all testimony is correct. That means a plane hit the pentagon, which I am willing to submit, and bombs went off at the WTC, which you are unwilling to accept.
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by wormser1971
Larry... you're just an idiot. Please use your time to gain knowledge in anything at all. Maybe some auto mechanics or something.
Let's see, you're the batshit-crazy conspiracy theorist, and you're questioning my knowledge of anything at all? That's rich.
Larry... you're just an idiot. Please use your time to gain knowledge in anything at all. Maybe some auto mechanics or something.
Let's see, you're the batshit-crazy conspiracy theorist, and you're questioning my knowledge of anything at all? That's rich.
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
Let's see, you're the batshit-crazy conspiracy theorist, and you're questioning my knowledge of anything at all? That's rich.
Actually, I do question your knowledge of anything. You make me sad, really. I would wager that your education ended around high school. Not that having little education is problematic. Having very little logical abilities is a problem. I have yet to see you contribute to any conversation.
Let's see, you're the batshit-crazy conspiracy theorist, and you're questioning my knowledge of anything at all? That's rich.
Actually, I do question your knowledge of anything. You make me sad, really. I would wager that your education ended around high school. Not that having little education is problematic. Having very little logical abilities is a problem. I have yet to see you contribute to any conversation.
http://tinyurl.com/n2hh7r7 Here is a map of DC.
Reagan airport is less than 1 mile from the pentagon. There is a definite possibility of people having seen planes fly regularly near the area in question. There is a possibility that a plane could have flown over the pentagon. There is a possibility that the plane hit the pentagon.
One thing is certain... The FBI only released one really lousy video that shows no plane (at least not definitively). If they would have released the south parking loit camera footage, a plane would have been seen with certainty. Why only the one camera angle?
Reagan airport is less than 1 mile from the pentagon. There is a definite possibility of people having seen planes fly regularly near the area in question. There is a possibility that a plane could have flown over the pentagon. There is a possibility that the plane hit the pentagon.
One thing is certain... The FBI only released one really lousy video that shows no plane (at least not definitively). If they would have released the south parking loit camera footage, a plane would have been seen with certainty. Why only the one camera angle?
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by wormser1971
Actually, I do question your knowledge of anything. You make me sad, really. I would wager that your education ended around high school. Not that having little education is problematic. Having very little logical abilities is a problem. I have yet to see you contribute to any conversation.
And yet from you we get gems such as this:
Originally posted by wormser1971
. There is a possibility that the plane hit the pentagon.
Let me make it perfectly clear--this thread (among others) has outted you as a mouth-breathing idiot, and nothing you do here henceforth will be taken with any degree of seriousness.
Gnosis
offline
offline
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
Let me make it perfectly clear--this thread (among others) has outted you as a mouth-breathing idiot, and nothing you do here henceforth will be taken with any degree of seriousness.
Hey Larry, choke on a fat one, you fuckin idiot.
Let me make it perfectly clear--this thread (among others) has outted you as a mouth-breathing idiot, and nothing you do here henceforth will be taken with any degree of seriousness.
Hey Larry, choke on a fat one, you fuckin idiot.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.