Forum > General Discussion > Politics and Religion > Watch the video... then call me a tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist.
Venkman
offline
offline
Originally posted by baumusc
All actors right Wormy? lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
this is where he'll tell you that these eyewitnesses have no credibility, yet all of his who 'heard bombs' are dead on accurate.
All actors right Wormy? lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
this is where he'll tell you that these eyewitnesses have no credibility, yet all of his who 'heard bombs' are dead on accurate.
Originally posted by seths99
this is where he'll tell you that these eyewitnesses have no credibility, yet all of his who 'heard bombs' are dead on accurate.
Not so much... what I will say is that none of them had a vantage point to see the plane hit the pentagon... they saw a fly over/by. Not impact.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__WXAyiwGrs
And the plane came from a different location than the official report. What is curious about that is that without the exact angle of entry to the pentagon, the damage does not match the impact. Now is when I post witnesses saying that the plane hit, but they didn't see it hit. They do dispute the flight path of the plane... which should trouble you!
BTW those interviews of yours are 9 years later. Why do you discount witnesses from during the event and give credit to 9 years of false memory creation?
Here is where that psych degree comes in
Originally posted by
A false memory is a fabricated or distorted recollection of an event that did not actually happen. People often think of memory as something like a video recorder, accurately documenting and storing everything that happens with perfect accuracy and clarity. In reality, memory is very prone to fallacy. People can feel completely confident that their memory is accurate, but this confidence is no guarantee that a particular memory is correct.
Factors that can influence false memory include misinformation and misattributing the original source of the information. Existing knowledge and other memories can also interfere with the formation of a new memory, causing the recollection of an event to be mistaken or entirely false.
Memory researcher Elizabeth Loftus has demonstrated through her research that it is possible to induce false memories through suggestion. She has also shown that these memories can become stronger and more vivid as time goes on. Over time, memories become distorted and begin to change. In some case, the original memory may be changed in order to incorporate new information or experiences.
So, again, why are you taking a 9 year gap and making it significant, yet throwing out testimony immediately taken?
You will always cling to this stuff. You are truly not capable of hearing that there is no santa
this is where he'll tell you that these eyewitnesses have no credibility, yet all of his who 'heard bombs' are dead on accurate.
Not so much... what I will say is that none of them had a vantage point to see the plane hit the pentagon... they saw a fly over/by. Not impact.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__WXAyiwGrs
And the plane came from a different location than the official report. What is curious about that is that without the exact angle of entry to the pentagon, the damage does not match the impact. Now is when I post witnesses saying that the plane hit, but they didn't see it hit. They do dispute the flight path of the plane... which should trouble you!
BTW those interviews of yours are 9 years later. Why do you discount witnesses from during the event and give credit to 9 years of false memory creation?
Here is where that psych degree comes in
Originally posted by
A false memory is a fabricated or distorted recollection of an event that did not actually happen. People often think of memory as something like a video recorder, accurately documenting and storing everything that happens with perfect accuracy and clarity. In reality, memory is very prone to fallacy. People can feel completely confident that their memory is accurate, but this confidence is no guarantee that a particular memory is correct.
Factors that can influence false memory include misinformation and misattributing the original source of the information. Existing knowledge and other memories can also interfere with the formation of a new memory, causing the recollection of an event to be mistaken or entirely false.
Memory researcher Elizabeth Loftus has demonstrated through her research that it is possible to induce false memories through suggestion. She has also shown that these memories can become stronger and more vivid as time goes on. Over time, memories become distorted and begin to change. In some case, the original memory may be changed in order to incorporate new information or experiences.
So, again, why are you taking a 9 year gap and making it significant, yet throwing out testimony immediately taken?
You will always cling to this stuff. You are truly not capable of hearing that there is no santa
You will love this site. Here is where they defend the witnesses of the attack. They are an unbiased site btw
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/witnesses.html
now here they are telling you why you're a moron about building 7
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/index.html
and a moron for believing wtc towers collapse story
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/symmetry.html
Good luck with that santa gift this year
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/witnesses.html
now here they are telling you why you're a moron about building 7
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/index.html
and a moron for believing wtc towers collapse story
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/symmetry.html
Good luck with that santa gift this year
Now I will tell you about the phrase "inattentional blindness".
We see what we think we see because we were not really looking.
A great video for you
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bR-k96laOI
Just seeing a plane fly by, then seeing an explosion does not mean the plane hit the pentagon building. Something did, but not necessarily a plane.
We see what we think we see because we were not really looking.
A great video for you
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bR-k96laOI
Just seeing a plane fly by, then seeing an explosion does not mean the plane hit the pentagon building. Something did, but not necessarily a plane.
Originally posted by seths99
this is where he'll tell you that these eyewitnesses have no credibility, yet all of his who 'heard bombs' are dead on accurate.
Yet you will say that one group has credibility and the other does not. Amazing. I understand that we have a video of a bomb going off at WTC which gives credibility to the witnesses
Here are those firefighters telling you about the bombs (explosions in lobby)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1zED8dy63w
Actors, right baum? Fucking idiots
this is where he'll tell you that these eyewitnesses have no credibility, yet all of his who 'heard bombs' are dead on accurate.
Yet you will say that one group has credibility and the other does not. Amazing. I understand that we have a video of a bomb going off at WTC which gives credibility to the witnesses
Here are those firefighters telling you about the bombs (explosions in lobby)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1zED8dy63w
Actors, right baum? Fucking idiots
Edited by wormser1971 on Nov 18, 2013 19:24:15
Why did the citgo video get confiscated?
Originally posted by
Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film.
Originally posted by
"It was like an earthquake," the Costa Rican native said last week. What Velasquez felt above him almost within touching distance was American Airlines Flight 77 just seconds before impact.
His gas station, open only to Department of Defense personnel, is the last structure between the Pentagon and the hillside that, hours later, would become a wailing knoll. "By the time I got outside all I could see was a giant cloud of smoke, first white then black, coming from the Pentagon," he said. "It was just a terrible, terrible thing to be so close to."
Originally posted by
Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film.
Originally posted by
"It was like an earthquake," the Costa Rican native said last week. What Velasquez felt above him almost within touching distance was American Airlines Flight 77 just seconds before impact.
His gas station, open only to Department of Defense personnel, is the last structure between the Pentagon and the hillside that, hours later, would become a wailing knoll. "By the time I got outside all I could see was a giant cloud of smoke, first white then black, coming from the Pentagon," he said. "It was just a terrible, terrible thing to be so close to."
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/September_17_2001.jpg
pop quiz.... What building is this?
pop quiz.... What building is this?
baumusc
offline
offline
Nope, pretty much everyone in that video that I posted said they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Try again. That tin foil hat must be thick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
Originally posted by baumusc
Nope, pretty much everyone in that video that I posted said they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Try again. That tin foil hat must be thick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
I think he's traded in the tinfoil and now just wears his ass as a hat instead.
Nope, pretty much everyone in that video that I posted said they saw the plane hit the Pentagon. Try again. That tin foil hat must be thick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfQEwxxVyKY
I think he's traded in the tinfoil and now just wears his ass as a hat instead.
Originally posted by wormser1971
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/September_17_2001.jpg
pop quiz.... What building is this?
That appears to be a building that had another flaming building fall on top of it.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/September_17_2001.jpg
pop quiz.... What building is this?
That appears to be a building that had another flaming building fall on top of it.
Venkman
offline
offline
Originally posted by wormser1971
Here is where that psych degree comes in
let's think about what would be easier as far as memory manipulation.....hearing 'bombs' go off during that event? or manufacturing a memory of an entire fucking airplane?
I'd look into a refund on that psych degree if I were you
Here is where that psych degree comes in
let's think about what would be easier as far as memory manipulation.....hearing 'bombs' go off during that event? or manufacturing a memory of an entire fucking airplane?
I'd look into a refund on that psych degree if I were you
Roughneck
offline
offline
Originally posted by rams78110
That appears to be a building that had another flaming building fall on top of it.
Appears.... when was it scheduled to be demolished?
That appears to be a building that had another flaming building fall on top of it.
Appears.... when was it scheduled to be demolished?
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Can we skip the tinfoil hat wearing phrase and just agree that you're batshit crazy and then be done with it?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.