Originally posted by Sir William PD
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by ddingo
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Last season when we had 1 RB on the roster it wouldn't be uncommon for a WR to be substituted into the game for the RB. This was especially frustrating in goal line situations. Was this the reason we lost to the Kingz in the conference championship game? I don't know, but I'm sure it didn't help.
Why didn't you put your FB or TE in the #2 RB position?
We did do that.
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by ddingo
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Last season when we had 1 RB on the roster it wouldn't be uncommon for a WR to be substituted into the game for the RB. This was especially frustrating in goal line situations. Was this the reason we lost to the Kingz in the conference championship game? I don't know, but I'm sure it didn't help.
Why didn't you put your FB or TE in the #2 RB position?
We did do that.
