Duplicate Post
Last edited Aug 25, 2008 09:02:19
Oso
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kirk Gibson
Originally posted by Oso
that tells me 2 things
rain is a good team and the rest of zeta is weak
Hahaha. Now thats some funny shit. I would put money on the Swashbucklers (Our 6th Place team) beating Perth today. I'm a realist but pound for pound Zeta is deep in strength. Our drop off starts after the 9th ranked team IMO.
no one is comparing the strength of zeta to alpha, at least im not, zeta is weak compared to rain, how many times do i need to splain dis 2 u lussy
in addition this friendly games dont mean shit, just another way for glb to get flex
one....people screw with AI
two....energy is not a factor
look at my team...on 1st string many teams outlevel us but with depth we are wining our games
Originally posted by Oso
that tells me 2 things
rain is a good team and the rest of zeta is weak
Hahaha. Now thats some funny shit. I would put money on the Swashbucklers (Our 6th Place team) beating Perth today. I'm a realist but pound for pound Zeta is deep in strength. Our drop off starts after the 9th ranked team IMO.
no one is comparing the strength of zeta to alpha, at least im not, zeta is weak compared to rain, how many times do i need to splain dis 2 u lussy
in addition this friendly games dont mean shit, just another way for glb to get flex
one....people screw with AI
two....energy is not a factor
look at my team...on 1st string many teams outlevel us but with depth we are wining our games
Last edited Aug 25, 2008 09:14:32
guinis72
offline
offline
So.....the "top heavy" division has the top 6 RB's in all of AA#1? We also have 8 out of the top 10, although one was from the LVSB. It seems to me that if half the teams in Zeta have a RB in the top 10, that'd make it hard to be a top-heavy division.
Tasmania beat us (Kingston) and has not played the Rain yet, nor has the Polynesian Swashbucklers who have one of the best offenses in AA#1 with 53 rushing TDs between their top 3 RBs and a hell of a WR corps.
I don't think it's a lopsided as it looks, many of the top teams have not played each other yet. Fortunately for the Uprising, we've already played all the playoff teams and only have a butt-kicking to administer to the Guam Tigers before the playoffs get underway.
Tasmania beat us (Kingston) and has not played the Rain yet, nor has the Polynesian Swashbucklers who have one of the best offenses in AA#1 with 53 rushing TDs between their top 3 RBs and a hell of a WR corps.
I don't think it's a lopsided as it looks, many of the top teams have not played each other yet. Fortunately for the Uprising, we've already played all the playoff teams and only have a butt-kicking to administer to the Guam Tigers before the playoffs get underway.
Last edited Aug 25, 2008 09:28:54
Oso
offline
offline
Originally posted by guinis72
So.....the "top heavy" division has the top 6 RB's in all of AA#1? We also have 8 out of the top 10, although one was from the LVSB. It seems to me that if half the teams in Zeta have a RB in the top 10, that'd make it hard to be a top-heavy division.
Tasmania beat us (Kingston) and has not played the Rain yet, nor has the Polynesian Swashbucklers who have one of the best offenses in AA#1 with 53 rushing TDs between their top 3 RBs and a hell of a WR corps.
I don't think it's a lopsided as it looks, many of the top teams have not played each other yet. Fortunately for the Uprising, we've already played all the playoff teams and only have a butt-kicking to administer to the Guam Tigers before the playoffs get underway.
thanks for making my case...im really confused now cuz ur stating exactly what ive been saying, zeta has 2-3 good teams and the rest are low tier
So.....the "top heavy" division has the top 6 RB's in all of AA#1? We also have 8 out of the top 10, although one was from the LVSB. It seems to me that if half the teams in Zeta have a RB in the top 10, that'd make it hard to be a top-heavy division.
Tasmania beat us (Kingston) and has not played the Rain yet, nor has the Polynesian Swashbucklers who have one of the best offenses in AA#1 with 53 rushing TDs between their top 3 RBs and a hell of a WR corps.
I don't think it's a lopsided as it looks, many of the top teams have not played each other yet. Fortunately for the Uprising, we've already played all the playoff teams and only have a butt-kicking to administer to the Guam Tigers before the playoffs get underway.
thanks for making my case...im really confused now cuz ur stating exactly what ive been saying, zeta has 2-3 good teams and the rest are low tier
guinis72
offline
offline
Lol. What I said could suggest that the top 8 is top-heavy (or 7 now that the LVSB RB is gone). It's tough to be top-heavy with 1-3 teams when you have half the starting RB's in Zeta making up 80% of the AA#1 RB leader board.
Last edited Aug 25, 2008 12:12:13
Oso
offline
offline
all that shows is that ur bottom is extremely weak, come on man look at your blow out teams
Oso
offline
offline
zeta has 3 teams getting killed by 100's
alpha has 1
of course u have guys all over the leader board
Last edited Aug 25, 2008 12:21:25
guinis72
offline
offline
So which is it.....are we top heavy with only 1-2 good teams, or is the bottom 1/2 weak?
All I was saying was that it's tough to only have 2 good teams when 8 Zeta RBs are on the leader board.
We'll see Week 16 though, I believe last year was split.
All I was saying was that it's tough to only have 2 good teams when 8 Zeta RBs are on the leader board.
We'll see Week 16 though, I believe last year was split.
Last edited Aug 25, 2008 12:35:30
Oso
offline
offline
bro the stats are always fucked due to the cupcakes allowing everyone else to blow the stats apart
Oso
offline
offline
that wont prove shit either
the proof lies in the scores already in place
Zeta top tier is slaughtering the rest of their conference while alphas top tier is a toss up between 8 teams
the proof lies in the scores already in place
Zeta top tier is slaughtering the rest of their conference while alphas top tier is a toss up between 8 teams
Oso
offline
offline
omg stop lol....its not about which conference is better then each other the argument is over the fact zeta is full of cupcakes
ok im done here this convo is giving me a headache
ok im done here this convo is giving me a headache
PG
offline
offline
Originally posted by Kirk Gibson
Originally posted by Oso
that tells me 2 things
rain is a good team and the rest of zeta is weak
Hahaha. Now thats some funny shit. I would put money on the Swashbucklers (Our 6th Place team) beating Perth today. I'm a realist but pound for pound Zeta is deep in strength. Our drop off starts after the 9th ranked team IMO.
You rang?
Originally posted by Oso
that tells me 2 things
rain is a good team and the rest of zeta is weak
Hahaha. Now thats some funny shit. I would put money on the Swashbucklers (Our 6th Place team) beating Perth today. I'm a realist but pound for pound Zeta is deep in strength. Our drop off starts after the 9th ranked team IMO.
You rang?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
