Warrior General Games

Here's a thought...

What if there was an agent to agent rating system. Like your profile on ebay. After every season a teams owner/coach could give the players agent 1-5 star rating and vice versa? That way over time we could identify agents who let their players go inactive, ect.

Originally posted by jakedood
Given those stats also include multiple games v Alaskan assassins, and mostly tier up games, Im not sure that's entirely fair

And he is a hybrid coverage and run stuffer

in general, i think he's a beast overall. But it's not gonna make me think that LBs can cover. He's a star so he can afford to go multiple directions. Regular players can't hit those kind of goals

Originally posted by Bretto007
Here's a thought...

What if there was an agent to agent rating system. Like your profile on ebay. After every season a teams owner/coach could give the players agent 1-5 star rating and vice versa? That way over time we could identify agents who let their players go inactive, ect.

it's a decent thought, but definitely wouldn't work. people would just rate each other bad for the hell of it. Like i don't think GE would get anything past 2 stars, and. that's if he's lucky

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/265107

not too bad a season here. i probably dont have him in the right positions half the time to make more plays.

Originally posted by TyDavis315
in general, i think he's a beast overall. But it's not gonna make me think that LBs can cover. He's a star so he can afford to go multiple directions. Regular players can't hit those kind of goals

Eh, not really. Coverage LBs aren't hard to build, it really comes down to molding them closer to how you make CBs.

This is my current LOLB: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/267596

This is my current Cover SS: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/267796

Neither have the sprint investment you typical see on these positions, but they both do have pass coverage skills, and awareness to handle the quick post routes that TEs do in GLB. For strong side run support I just slap on closing speed and max pursuit since its so cheap SP wise.

Changes? CHANGES?!? I just hope we get some new plays.

Originally posted by BoDiddley

This is my current LOLB: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/267596


pretty nice

I focused mainly on takeaway skills (he's on the slow side), but have had some success this year.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/269508

Originally posted by jakedood
Thanks bro!

Yeah im pretty happy with him in that regard, and yeah they are at an inherent disadvantage in man coverage systems but then most lbs are in football, its not a position you usually want to be marking a top receiver on their own

Me and jake have put a lot of efford on GoD builds, it was a long process.

i have a coverage lb on my rebels squad. so far he has been great and been pretty easy to build. but he did have to be a star lb. this allows him to get all skills high.

Originally posted by BoDiddley
Eh, not really. Coverage LBs aren't hard to build, it really comes down to molding them closer to how you make CBs.

This is my current LOLB: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/267596

This is my current Cover SS: http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/267796

Neither have the sprint investment you typical see on these positions, but they both do have pass coverage skills, and awareness to handle the quick post routes that TEs do in GLB. For strong side run support I just slap on closing speed and max pursuit since its so cheap SP wise.

your safety is pretty solid, your LB has regressed each season. As long as he keeps getting picks it'll be fine, but you can see he's allowing more and more receptions as the competition gets better

Originally posted by Nematoad
I focused mainly on takeaway skills (he's on the slow side), but have had some success this year.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/269508

can't cover but can definitely force a turnover, that's probably the best that you can hope for from an LB in coverage tbh

Originally posted by jakedood
Thanks bro!

Yeah im pretty happy with him in that regard, and yeah they are at an inherent disadvantage in man coverage systems but then most lbs are in football, its not a position you usually want to be marking a top receiver on their own

yeah very good build, funny how similar lots of GOD, BSB, and BB's builds seem to be. the one negative on our end is our cov LB is a non s* but after seeing that build i wish we went with a s* cov LB or combo. good job for sure

Originally posted by TyDavis315
it's a decent thought, but definitely wouldn't work. people would just rate each other bad for the hell of it. Like i don't think GE would get anything past 2 stars, and. that's if he's lucky

I would be happy with 2 stars

Originally posted by DeeVee8
Changes? CHANGES?!? I just hope we get some new plays.

Lol...what I was thinking too.