Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Duro
Depends on where your low chemistry players are at. Certainly hurts both.

I meant in General but I have it just about everywhere so that doesn't help. We are just struggling so far. We definitely perform better when passing. I was hoping for a strong running game though.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
I have the tactics set up for as close to 50/50 as possible and 99% of games show that, however that wasnt the case this game and i haven't changed the tactics page and the lead was never big enough for trailing to kick in so what else would you call it if not rng?

Any time I lose it's because of RNG too. I am perfection.

Must be nice to never place the blame on yourself for any loss. I'm gonna go ahead and adopt that philosophy.

Originally posted by Rob.
Any time I lose it's because of RNG too. I am perfection.

Must be nice to never place the blame on yourself for any loss. I'm gonna go ahead and adopt that philosophy.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
The defense was interesting, i saw what you were trying to do. This game shows i have few tweaks to make but southside can hang with the big teams.


Never said I didnt have adjustments to make saying Im disappointed that rng decided this was the game where it would ignore my tactics %. sorry your too bullheaded to see that.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans

Never said I didnt have adjustments to make saying Im disappointed that rng decided this was the game where it would ignore my tactics %. sorry your too bullheaded to see that.

You blamed your loss on RNG. You should change your user name to Excuses, because you have one for every loss you've ever had.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans

Never said I didnt have adjustments to make saying Im disappointed that rng decided this was the game where it would ignore my tactics %. sorry your too bullheaded to see that.

it could have been situational too... like 2nd down/3rd down yardage causing passing instead of rushing.

We caused quite a few 3rd and mediums/longs, and since you never run the ball on any longer than 3rd and 3, that can push the pass/run ratio toward pass more than tactically expected. You also ran it up the middle on 2nd and 10 a few times, which will usually get you less than 7 yards, almost automatically causing a pass on 3rd down. There's much more than rng that went on there today.

ya I messed up my tactic and went coverage on 3rd and long against you. made me a little sad to see but still was a good game.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
it could have been situational too... like 2nd down/3rd down yardage causing passing instead of rushing.

We caused quite a few 3rd and mediums/longs, and since you never run the ball on any longer than 3rd and 3, that can push the pass/run ratio toward pass more than tactically expected. You also ran it up the middle on 2nd and 10 a few times, which will usually get you less than 7 yards, almost automatically causing a pass on 3rd down. There's much more than rng that went on there today.

Don't try to use logic with USC. It clearly wasn't his fault.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
it could have been situational too... like 2nd down/3rd down yardage causing passing instead of rushing.

We caused quite a few 3rd and mediums/longs, and since you never run the ball on any longer than 3rd and 3, that can push the pass/run ratio toward pass more than tactically expected. You also ran it up the middle on 2nd and 10 a few times, which will usually get you less than 7 yards, almost automatically causing a pass on 3rd down. There's much more than rng that went on there today.

the issue isnt third down it was second down that was the issue. I dont want to tip the % but my 2nd down runs should of matched my 1st down runs or close to it. It didnt even come close. Cant say it would of gotten us the win but some drives would of gone a lot longer had it been the case. I'll definitely be tweaking the tactics to better safe guard in the future.

Originally posted by Rob.
Don't try to use logic with USC. It clearly wasn't his fault.

Coming from the guy who blatantly ignores facts and posts to make his arguement

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
Coming from the guy who blatantly ignores facts and posts to make his arguement

Pot. Kettle. Black.

Originally posted by Rob.
Pot. Kettle. Black.

I address everything but once again you ignore that fact to make your argument.

hell you take shots at me for Originally posted by Rob.
Any time I lose it's because of RNG too. I am perfection.

Must be nice to never place the blame on yourself for any loss. I'm gonna go ahead and adopt that philosophy.

despite this

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
The defense was interesting, i saw what you were trying to do. This game shows i have few tweaks to make but southside can hang with the big teams.

Idk what chip you have on your shoulder but it isnt my problem so take your issues out on someone else.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
Idk what chip you have on your shoulder but it isnt my problem so take your issues out on someone else.

So you admit that you lost because you didn't make enough tweaks? Or you lost because of RNG? The first post you made was blaming RNG. Classic USC deflecting blame after every loss.

Originally posted by Rob.
So you admit that you lost because you didn't make enough tweaks? Or you lost because of RNG? The first post you made was blaming RNG. Classic USC deflecting blame after every loss.

bit of both. The rng definitely hurt but there are tweaks i can make to help tighten up the tactics to help avoid such drastic rng swings. Least i believe i can, but you know what they say: the best laid plans of mice and men often go awry.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
bit of both. The rng definitely hurt but there are tweaks i can make to help tighten up the tactics to help avoid such drastic rng swings. Least i believe i can, but you know what they say: the best laid plans of mice and men often go awry.

That's great and all, but every coordinator could say that after every loss.

Originally posted by Rob.
That's great and all, but every coordinator could say that after every loss.

you can say it after every win too. Thats the reality of a % based tactics system. Unless there is an algorithm that adjusts play calling to accurately hit the percentages its all just a crap shoot.