Warrior General Games

Originally posted by rob4121983
You forgot to say good game. MO can be beat and you didn't do it.

You're right, I just went back and watched how you performed against it when you knew it was coming.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/60576

Got to love a play that stuffs the middle of field, blew up the few pitches that you tried to run and sacked you 10+ times.



I do know the play can be beat, but it shouldn't be a failsafe for lazy coordinators to plug in and rack of wins with.

Originally posted by Parab00n
You're right, I just went back and watched how you performed against it when you knew it was coming.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/60576

Got to love a play that stuffs the middle of field, blew up the few pitches that you tried to run and sacked you 10+ times.

I do know the play can be beat, but it shouldn't be a failsafe for lazy coordinators to plug in and rack of wins with.

I still said good game after that one. He got some good rolls and blew me out. My team is built for passing and I have now realized that trying to run is not worth my time. In my last game I successfully passed against MO. I agree that it is kinda overpowered because it stops inside runs and provides a good pash rush against passes, but I've seen you murder that play before against Dublin, so obviously you weren't ready for it.

Para so mad, even tho he is #1 again. You are welcome btw

Originally posted by rob4121983
I still said good game after that one. He got some good rolls and blew me out. My team is built for passing and I have now realized that trying to run is not worth my time. In my last game I successfully passed against MO. I agree that it is kinda overpowered because it stops inside runs and provides a good pash rush against passes, but I've seen you murder that play before against Dublin, so obviously you weren't ready for it.


I ran the exact same offense vs them as I did Dublin.

Originally posted by Parab00n
I ran the exact same offense vs them as I did Dublin.

I didn't watch the game. So you ran outside runs all game against middle overload and had less than 100 yards of offense? If that's true than I agree the play is overpowered.

Originally posted by peeti
Para so mad, even tho he is #1 again. You are welcome btw

Peeti, you were on here crying about the exact same play a few days ago...You are welcome by the way, I see you pretty much ran my defensive strategy against him.

Originally posted by Parab00n
Peeti, you were on here crying about the exact same play a few days ago...You are welcome by the way, I see you pretty much ran my defensive strategy against him.

? not at all, lol. Check all my games, I ran exact the same D I used all season and changed only one play vs 4 WR sets. but keep trash talking, I dont care But nice to know if that means you copied mine before. Ni but srs, dont even try to come up with such shit

To MO yes, definitely. I even made threads about it and suggested ways to (possibly) nerf it, but besides bHall no one of the "well known" agents cared about it.
So I just think its funny how you know rage, even tho you thought different when you beat Dublin with it

It should just be an inside run stuff play. If the LB's actually did what it shows in the play art than it wouldn't be a problem. I do agree it is an easy way for lazy coordinators to dominate, particularly at rookie level. Make it either a great pass rush or inside rush defense but not both.

Originally posted by rob4121983
It should just be an inside run stuff play. If the LB's actually did what it shows in the play art than it wouldn't be a problem. I do agree it is an easy way for lazy coordinators to dominate, particularly at rookie level. Make it either a great pass rush or inside rush defense but not both.

what I said in many threads

Originally posted by peeti
? not at all, lol. Check all my games, I ran exact the same D I used all season and changed only one play vs 4 WR sets. but keep trash talking, I dont care But nice to know if that means you copied mine before. Ni but srs, dont even try to come up with such shit



DEs on Elusive - Check
Man Base for Spread set - Check

I just looked at all your ladder games and your last 3 League games this season...not 1 time did you run Man Base. Yet you ran it 51 times vs QC this last game.

Originally posted by peeti
what I said in many threads

I didn't see those threads, but you are right. It needs some tweaking. Spamming one play all game shouldn't get those good of results against rush and pass. I'm always a fan of variety. Make DC's be a little more creative.

Originally posted by Parab00n
DEs on Elusive - Check
Man Base for Spread set - Check

I just looked at all your ladder games and your last 3 League games this season...not 1 time did you run Man Base. Yet you ran it 51 times vs QC this last game.

What script are you using to get exact play counts?

Originally posted by Parab00n
DEs on Elusive - Check
Man Base for Spread set - Check

I just looked at all your ladder games and your last 3 League games this season...not 1 time did you run Man Base. Yet you ran it 51 times vs QC this last game.

DEs on elusive-you Chatted me about that.Told you I heard that a season ago as well and used it vs RUNGLB for example as well with boobs and said I will give it a try vs QCB. So yeah, cheers.

Man Base-exactly that ONE play I changed for this game, lol. If he runs only one Formation, then the impact was big. I ran that play over and over last season tho but found plays like LB robber this season way better. Changed that play cause I saw you beat his WR Unders with it, and you also posted that play to me, so? You think you invented that play? like you invented MO yourself, u used to beat SF? kk, if thats what you are awake for now, then go ahead man.

Funny how I sometimes really took the measures of some agents too high

Originally posted by peeti
DEs on elusive-you Chatted me about that.Told you I heard that a season ago as well and used it vs RUNGLB for example as well with boobs and said I will give it a try vs QCB. So yeah, cheers.

Man Base-exactly that ONE play I changed for this game, lol. If he runs only one Formation, then the impact was big. I ran that play over and over last season tho but found plays like LB robber this season way better. Changed that play cause I saw you beat his WR Unders with it, and you also posted that play to me, so? You think you invented that play? like you invented MO yourself, u used to beat SF? kk, if thats what you awake now, then go ahead man.

Funny how I sometimes really took the measures of some agents too high

You asked me if I ran C2 to stop the WR Unders, I tell you no I use Man Base because it doubles the WR Under play. You then talk about how dumb you are for not realizing that. Don't come on here telling me I owe you thanks for beating him if you don't want to get called out. You want to make smart ass comments to people on here all the time but get your feelings hurt when they make them back.

Originally posted by Parab00n
You asked me if I ran C2 to stop the WR Unders, I tell you no I use Man Base because it doubles the WR Under play. You then talk about how dumb you are for not realizing that. Don't come on here telling me I owe you thanks for beating him if you don't want to get called out. You want to make smart ass comments to people on here all the time but get your feelings hurt when they make them back.

Uhm, no not all. No hurt feelings, just said its bullshit. I already posted in my last comment you linked me the play in chat, so whats ur point? Yeah man, thanks. I would have used the C2 vs his Unders, after you linked the play I watched the Game and decided to play Base instead. Never said anything different, but thats still one play I changed.

But ok, you are right. I only beat him cause you chatted to me. Np, if thats what you wanna think. May also be because I made a whole new playbook and tactics on Offense (which didnt even work well tho).

But yeah...listen GLB2, i inly beat Queen City cause para made it happen