User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pro Leagues > Rd.2 - GBB vs Hogs
Page:
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
It's not an excuse, it's true. When Dogs of War beat us I gave them props, but Chicago only wins because of bullshit. A CB with little strength & carrying breaks two tackles after an interception? A returner with 102.46 carrying (including VAs) and 46% avoid fumble (VAs + AEQ) fumbles again? He's fumbled as many times against Chicago in two games as he did against the rest of the WL combined. I really think Bort has coded it so that my teams have more turnovers.
Edited by jdbolick on Oct 26, 2013 22:54:49
 
.spider.
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
He's fumbled as many times against Chicago in two games as he did against the rest of the WL combined.


Cant it just be possible that Chicago has an excelent special teams unit?
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by .spider.
Cant it just be possible that Chicago has an excelent special teams unit?

The STOP who forced the fumble today had forced exactly zero the rest of s37. And what part of "A returner with 102.46 carrying (including VAs) and 46% avoid fumble (VAs + AEQ)" did you not get?
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Wise ran a scrim immediately after our game and lost because he always loses if he doesn't get a shitload of turnovers. No one, including him, thinks that Chicago is as good a team as Grand Banks.
 
.spider.
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Wise ran a scrim immediately after our game and lost because he always loses if he doesn't get a shitload of turnovers. No one, including him, thinks that Chicago is as good a team as Grand Banks.


They are 13-5 so far this season in WL including 2-0 vs GBB. I think you're hatred for Wise is skewing your judgement. They are a good team, if you cant agree to that you are seriously dissing the other 13 teams they've beaten, including your team. Luck doesnt get you 13 wins in WL, but being a good team does.
 
ricksta1975
offline
Link
 
It takes a brave man to be told you gonna whine after a loss and still do so.
 
JT_HOOD
HOOD
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Wise ran a scrim immediately after our game and lost because he always loses if he doesn't get a shitload of turnovers. No one, including him, thinks that Chicago is as good a team as Grand Banks.


should just stop now man
 
Jiddy78
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JT_HOOD
should just stop now man


^^^

Run bolick......Ruuuuunnnnn
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by Abstract Actuary

On 4th and 12 to seal the game, too. What a fickle game.

I don't mind losing to a team that has a great gameplan or is just better. I really hate GLB when an inferior team wins because of bullshit. *shrug*


tisk tisk tisk. I find it humorous that in the last 3 seasons the Hedgehogs are 3-0 in league play vs your team, yet are clearly inferior and only win by bullshit. This doesn't make you seem like a sore looser and a moron at all. /sarcasm
 
Pwned
offline
Link
 
Lost all respect for jdballlick after this game..

Take it like a man you big pussy.
 
WiSeIVIaN
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
It's not an excuse, it's true. When Dogs of War beat us I gave them props, but Chicago only wins because of bullshit. A CB with little strength & carrying breaks two tackles after an interception? A returner with 102.46 carrying (including VAs) and 46% avoid fumble (VAs + AEQ) fumbles again? He's fumbled as many times against Chicago in two games as he did against the rest of the WL combined. I really think Bort has coded it so that my teams have more turnovers.


It don't know where to start here, since you clearly don't even understand GLB.

FFUM at the end

If this is what you are going to cry about, there is an extremely high chance that your team isn't driving downfield with 46 seconds left to score a TD regardless. But even so, realize that this is a game of BATTLE ROLLS. So you adding in your STOP SA's that the game is balanced around to make your dot seem unfumbleable is a bit weak. I'm not here saying "OMG MY 115 str 110 tackling guy forced fumbles" like an idiot. You see that, how I'm not making comments to look like a complete idiot? #lifelessons

I don't mean to insult the build of a dot on your team (in case it isn't your multi, though it baffles me how someone could stand to be on your team if they weren't a multi, though I digress), but your KRer has 12 fumbles through the last 2 WL season+playoffs, which is a bit of a weakness. You can force fumbles only on high quality tackles, aka tackles where the make tackle roll hard wins vs the break tackle roll. The FACT that your KRer has no bt% AE hurts his abilities to not fumble. Its not just about not fumble%, and every KRer in the game starts at 30% and still can fumble, so please learn to stfu and at least have a weak grasp of game mechanics before spouting shit out of your keyboard.

Also our STOPS have a combined 14 fumbles THIS SEASON. They are some amazing dots and stizz does a fantastic job slotting the STs. FFUMS happen crybaby.

INT with 2 broken tackles

Fyi the beastly dot that is Darrelle Watson won the s35 USA DMVP and is p beastly. Great job by T2 putting him in a double coverage spot to make a play against your shitty progressions. The WR he broke the tackle on had probably 8 strength and 8 tackling, go cry a river. HB had 8 tackling. These things happen in GLB, go pound sand idiot.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by .spider.

Cant it just be possible that Chicago has an excelent special teams unit?

The STOP who forced the fumble today had forced exactly zero the rest of s37. And what part of "A returner with 102.46 carrying (including VAs) and 46% avoid fumble (VAs + AEQ)" did you not get?


Lol just because a certain stop has had an unlucky season and not a lot of tackle attempts doesn't mean he isn't built to ffums. If anything I should be crying he didn't force any fumbles in our regular season game you stupid luckbox.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Wise ran a scrim immediately after our game and lost because he always loses if he doesn't get a shitload of turnovers. No one, including him, thinks that Chicago is as good a team as Grand Banks.


So now we want to go on the "scrims matter" bandwagon? Quite a turn. I adjusted a few things and ran 3 scrims. I have another playoff game to play and I need more games to self-scout.

Only league games matter and this season we are 2-0 vs your team. If for some stupid reason your idiot self wants to include lolscrims we are 6-2 vs your team this season. OMG YOU ARE SUCH THE BETTER TEAM HOW CAN I NOT SEE IT.

Regardless, do I think the Hedgehogs beat GBB 100% of the time? Of course not. The only stats we have this season put it close to 100% or if you wanna include scrims 75%. It was a close exciting game and a hard fought scrum, but you clearly do not have a better team this season, so you should perhaps learn when your posts make you look 100x worse than I could ever make you look.

Also according to your doctored sig, you just got beat by someone among the bottom 5% of WL owners. Maybe your new mantra should be "I AM THE 1% (bottom of WL owners)" Your posts in this thread are so incredibly stupid. Not only did you not have the balls to talk shit before the game, but you came in after the loss and started talking shit (which is even worse).

#bololickvslogic
Edited by WiSeIVIaN on Oct 27, 2013 07:18:59
 
ghuffman
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
tisk tisk tisk. I find it humorous that in the last 3 seasons the Hedgehogs are 3-0 in league play vs your team, yet are clearly inferior and only win by bullshit. This doesn't make you seem like a sore looser and a moron at all. /sarcasm


This is all you needed to say wise. How many times will jd lose to you in meaningful games before he just says you have been better in the last couple of seasons?

cmon jd you are losing glb cred quickly
 
Mob-6
offline
Link
 
Little known fact: Catch22 was let go for sabotaging the Hedgehogs sims during WL. Chicago would have like 20 WL championships if Catch wasn't messing things up behind the scenes. You just watch, when Catch doesn't have access to screw up the Hog's sims, Chicago will win WL.
 
Mob-6
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick
but Chicago only wins because of bullshit. A CB with little strength & carrying breaks two tackles after an interception?


Yeah, I agree that is complete bullshit. You're 70 tackling WR and HB should have had him.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by .spider.
They are 13-5 so far this season in WL including 2-0 vs GBB. I think you're hatred for Wise is skewing your judgement.

The bias against me is the only way a non-moron wouldn't agree this was bullshit:

* a guy who hasn't forced a fumble all season forces one against a returner loaded up with avoid fumble AEQ.
* a non-returner CB somehow breaks two tackles after an interception to take it the distance.
* a PHB with three receptions the last two seasons combined somehow hauls in a 4th & 12 against our top cover LB with 70+ jumping, 90 vision, 11 favored Swat Ball, and +15% deflect ball.

Again, I gave props to Dogs of War when they beat us and would have done so if they had repeated that tomorrow. They have a great roster and strong gameplans. But I hate losing games in GLB because of bullshit. I know people are going to give me shit because it's me, but even if you choose not to admit it you know I'm right. Chicago wasn't the better team.


Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
You see that, how I'm not making comments to look like a complete idiot? #lifelessons

You really don't realize the irony in this statement? That's the thing you're second most known for in GLB besides WL failure. Kudos on throwing to the PHB, as uncovering him was a calculated risk to double Put the Lime in the Coconut & Jonnis HarPitta, who are dangerous weapons.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.