Warrior General Games

Originally posted by dimmy finster
2x champs . Is it more or less impressive than Valhalla's run?

Competition is a lot tougher these days.

Yes, it is more impressive!

HHWC

Real LT

How do you figure winning 2 championships while your players can plateau the whole time is more impressive than winning 3 championships, 1 with your players underleveled, 1 with your players plateauing, and 1 with your players in decline?

Originally posted by Gart888
How do you figure winning 2 championships while your players can plateau the whole time is more impressive than winning 3 championships, 1 with your players underleveled, 1 with your players plateauing, and 1 with your players in decline? o_O
Plus, would HHWC have won any if Bort didn't allow boosting to 72 past 440?

Originally posted by jdbolick

Plus, would HHWC have won any if Bort didn't allow boosting to 72 past 440?

Would it have mattered if equipment upgrades didn't become free?

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Originally posted by jdbolick


Plus, would HHWC have won any if Bort didn't allow boosting to 72 past 440?

Would it have mattered if equipment upgrades didn't become free?

yes? teams were still getting 72s on their top players, and boosting makes your players better regardless of what equip they're wearing.

Originally posted by Gart888
yes? teams were still getting 72s on their top players, and boosting makes your players better regardless of what equip they're wearing.

I'm saying they still could of won if they were lvl 69 or 70 or whatever they were versus teams who had 72s with only a select players havings upgrades.

oh yeah. fair point. i think valhalla winning without 72s shows that's possible. would have been tougher though.

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
I'm saying they still could of won if they were lvl 69 or 70 or whatever they were versus teams who had 72s with only a select players havings upgrades.

We had like 10 players in that situation. Maybe 12. Is that soo many more than other teams?

Originally posted by ufshowboat
Originally posted by Phil Jackson

I'm saying they still could of won if they were lvl 69 or 70 or whatever they were versus teams who had 72s with only a select players havings upgrades.

We had like 10 players in that situation. Maybe 12. Is that soo many more than other teams?

you probably should have been replying to bolick, not jackson. >.<

For the record... I do not feel that we are on Valhalla's level. Nobody is. Yet.

Originally posted by Gart888
you probably should have been replying to bolick, not jackson. >.<

My bad. I'm just so used to dpride acting that it was some kind of huge thing.

I'm also just happy that we are in the discussion for best team. I think Hali, HHWC, and Valhalla make a nice top 3 and people can discuss who is the best based on their own opinion. Hali's never been demoted and has 1 more WL season than Honolulu so that's something I respect big time. Valhalla didn't have have that longevity but their 3 titles were so amazing to me because everybody just KNEW they were untouchable. I don't think there's ever been an untouchable team like that.

Originally posted by ufshowboat
For the record... I do not feel that we are on Valhalla's level. Nobody is. Yet.

yeah, i feel like it would take 4 in a row at this point to compare to them. you guys are well on your way though.

Originally posted by ufshowboat
My bad. I'm just so used to dpride acting that it was some kind of huge thing.

which is p great since his team is going to depend on it so heavily next season.

Originally posted by Gart888
which is p great since his team is going to depend on it so heavily next season.

Did pretty good without them this season though