Warrior General Games

Originally posted by GP1
Originally posted by StoutOne DTD

It was always stated decline would probably be at 10 seasons tbh.

The number of seasons is totally irrelevant. It's the 440 cut off date. The difference between day 39 creation and day 40 of the SAME season is three extra boosts.

Yep.

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by StoutOne DTD

Originally posted by jrry32



I don't recall that.

It was in FAQ.

I don't recall that

I do. (Well, plateau though, not decline.)

Originally posted by GP1
Originally posted by StoutOne DTD

It was always stated decline would probably be at 10 seasons tbh.

The number of seasons is totally irrelevant. It's the 440 cut off date. The difference between day 39 creation and day 40 of the SAME season is three extra boosts.

I can't help that it said seasons and not days, at that time they still we're clueless on what they were going to do about it. I'm just stating what we did know, don't shoot the messenger.

Originally posted by TrevJo


I do. (Well, plateau though, not decline.)

Yeah, I knew it was one of the 2 or something about end of career....

Originally posted by NiborRis
I'll take my reparations in the form of Rice Krispy Treats, please.[/QUOTE


Have you ever made them with the choconilla flavor rice krispies? so so good

Originally posted by StoutOne DTD
I can't help that it said seasons and not days, at that time they still we're clueless on what they were going to do about it. I'm just stating what we did know, don't shoot the messenger.

That's fine. And I'm telling you what we didn't know: an arbitrarily assigned cut off date would determine who was eligible for plateau boosts. To even insinuate that you could plan for some unforeseen change is disingenuous at best or retarded at worst.

Originally posted by StoutOne DTD
Originally posted by jrockk33


Here is how it will change we beat your ass 3 levels lower and we will do it again with equal levels.


So much pride over a 1 point reg season win, how lame.

Just think if you guys were only 3-4 levels higher than us you might have won...oh wait you were thats right, god you guys really suck.

Originally posted by GP1
Originally posted by StoutOne DTD

I can't help that it said seasons and not days, at that time they still we're clueless on what they were going to do about it. I'm just stating what we did know, don't shoot the messenger.

That's fine. And I'm telling you what we didn't know: an arbitrarily assigned cut off date would determine who was eligible for plateau boosts. To even insinuate that you could plan for some unforeseen change is disingenuous at best or retarded at worst.

Either way I don't see a reason to give a benefit to players who chose not to get to as high of a level as they could. (Or sucked at XP.)

Originally posted by StoutOne DTD
Originally posted by jrockk33



Actually I will tell u what how about we don't boost but if we beat you again(which we will) then you do us all a favor and quit the game...what do ya say Stouty poo??

What happens when Saigon wins?

That would be the final sign of the apocolypse therefore we would all play season 17 in hell.

Originally posted by chronoaug
Have you ever made them with the choconilla flavor rice krispies? so so good

Chrono. how did you manage to mess that quote up so badly?

And yes, they are soooo good.

Originally posted by TrevJo
Either way I don't see a reason to give a benefit to players who chose not to get to as high of a level as they could. (Or sucked at XP.)



How did anyone choose not to have the option for three extra boosts? That determination was set forth by Bort one year after the players were created.

Originally posted by TrevJo
Originally posted by GP1

Originally posted by StoutOne DTD


I can't help that it said seasons and not days, at that time they still we're clueless on what they were going to do about it. I'm just stating what we did know, don't shoot the messenger.

That's fine. And I'm telling you what we didn't know: an arbitrarily assigned cut off date would determine who was eligible for plateau boosts. To even insinuate that you could plan for some unforeseen change is disingenuous at best or retarded at worst.

Either way I don't see a reason to give a benefit to players who chose not to get to as high of a level as they could. (Or sucked at XP.)

Chose. lol

Originally posted by jrockk33


Just think if you guys were only 3-4 levels higher than us you might have won...oh wait you were thats right, god you guys really suck.

What in the hell are you talking about?

Originally posted by TrevJo
Originally posted by GP1

Originally posted by StoutOne DTD


I can't help that it said seasons and not days, at that time they still we're clueless on what they were going to do about it. I'm just stating what we did know, don't shoot the messenger.

That's fine. And I'm telling you what we didn't know: an arbitrarily assigned cut off date would determine who was eligible for plateau boosts. To even insinuate that you could plan for some unforeseen change is disingenuous at best or retarded at worst.

Either way I don't see a reason to give a benefit to players who chose not to get to as high of a level as they could. (Or sucked at XP.)

Not every team that didn't reach level 72 super slow built or waited a season without XP. We played the first half of our careers before the blowout XP regulations so it was a constant battle to make sure max XP was reached. in some games it was impossible.

Originally posted by GP1
Originally posted by TrevJo

Either way I don't see a reason to give a benefit to players who chose not to get to as high of a level as they could. (Or sucked at XP.)



How did anyone choose not to have the option for three extra boosts? That determination was set forth by Bort one year after the players were created.

By not boosting at the end of their first season.