some of those are way over inflated by ST C's
jsully75
offline
offline
Originally posted by StinkCheese
some of those are way over inflated by ST C's
My team is hurt by st's guys.
some of those are way over inflated by ST C's
My team is hurt by st's guys.
The Big Cack Envy
offline
offline
Originally posted by josh85_1983
Originally posted by Ronnie Brown 23
I wish I had a ST unit of Cs
i dunno, we did it with our SSB team, the OK FAT in my profile. its had mixed results. I think its better to have high stam regular players.....jury is still out in our opinion.
Originally posted by Ronnie Brown 23
I wish I had a ST unit of Cs
i dunno, we did it with our SSB team, the OK FAT in my profile. its had mixed results. I think its better to have high stam regular players.....jury is still out in our opinion.
johnbarber
offline
offline
ST's C's aren't all that great. I have 3 personal ones and they're built really well.
Total production in all their seasons of existence:
probably a total of 5 ff between the 3 of them
pancakes by the bushels but probably 1 kr td/pr td every 8 games.
Is it worth it, probably not.
Total production in all their seasons of existence:
probably a total of 5 ff between the 3 of them
pancakes by the bushels but probably 1 kr td/pr td every 8 games.
Is it worth it, probably not.
Ronnie Brown 23
offline
offline
Wouldn't the morale loss by defenders and energy saved by your starters make it worth it? I mean, I'm playing my starting O-line on STs (rotation).
josh85_1983
offline
offline
Originally posted by Ronnie Brown 23
Wouldn't the morale loss by defenders and energy saved by your starters make it worth it? I mean, I'm playing my starting O-line on STs (rotation).
Wouldn't the morale loss by defenders and energy saved by your starters make it worth it? I mean, I'm playing my starting O-line on STs (rotation).
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.