User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Champion League > USA pro will have the most representatives in the WL next season ...
Page:
 
Outlaw Dogs
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by CelticRaider
Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs

I heard Meows Meows has seen more cock then a urinal.

Heard his bathroom has its own glory holes set up and everything.


Clay Aikens Underoos is the last thing I have to say on this subject.
 
Link
 
This is horrible work by you two
 
tycoon34
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone

Originally posted by CelticRaider


Originally posted by sirallan



thread needs more SEAPL








 
jamz
offline
Link
 
are you guys fap to this?
 
avgbrad
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PsychoMan
Originally posted by Ahrens858

inb4 CPL won championship


this season, CPL represented the best team, not gonna argue that


CPL represented 2 of the 4 best teams tbh

how many times we gotta go thru this?

weak troll is weak
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Ahrens858
inb4 CPL won championship


Only because they exploited the HB screen.
 
Asheme
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by GeneralMakaveli
Only because they exploited the HB screen.

lol u
 
DWetzel
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PsychoMan
hah! care to make it 2 trillion?


You're on!

As soon as it is mathematically proven that USAPL will have the most teams forever, I'll pay you. If at any time they don't you pay me.
 
PackMan97
offline
Link
 
Even though I'll have two guys on a CPL team, feel free to label me as a USAPL homer. After all...just because Canada claims to be an independent country doesn't mean they weren't secretly annexed decades ago.
 
tjsexkitten82
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by avgbrad
Hate to introduce math to this thread but....

CPL
WL champ
2 of 4 teams in Conference finals
3 of 8 teams in 2nd round

USAPL
WL runner up
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
2 of 8 teams in 2nd round

WELP
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
1 of 8 teams in 2nd round


oops you forgot to include 1st round

probably bc USAPL > CPL in 1st round

just sayin
 
Link
 
Originally posted by tjplainclothesmod82
Originally posted by avgbrad

Hate to introduce math to this thread but....

CPL
WL champ
2 of 4 teams in Conference finals
3 of 8 teams in 2nd round

USAPL
WL runner up
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
2 of 8 teams in 2nd round

WELP
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
1 of 8 teams in 2nd round


oops you forgot to include 1st round

probably bc USAPL > CPL in 1st round

just sayin



I think he will concede the fact that USPL is superior at losing in the 1st round of the playoffs. Excellent point though.
 
avgbrad
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tjplainclothesmod82
Originally posted by avgbrad

Hate to introduce math to this thread but....

CPL
WL champ
2 of 4 teams in Conference finals
3 of 8 teams in 2nd round
3 of 16 teams in Playoffs

USAPL
WL runner up
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
2 of 8 teams in 2nd round
4 of 16 teams in Playoffs

WELP
1 of 4 teams in Conference finals
1 of 8 teams in 2nd round



oops you forgot to include 1st round

probably bc USAPL > CPL in 1st round

just sayin


happy now?
 
Jiddy78
offline
Link
 
Cloud dots are the best ya dumb sons of b*tches.
 
avgbrad
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tjplainclothesmod82
oops you forgot to include 1st round

probably bc USAPL > CPL in 1st round

just sayin

CPL went 2-0 in the 1st round vs USAPL --I can see why you would want to bring up the USAPL > CPL in 1st round argument
CPL went 1-0 in the 2nd round vs USAPL
CPL went 0-1 in the 3rd round vs USAPL loldrinkin
CPL went 1-0 in the finals ldo
CPL was responsible for all 4 USAPL losses in the playoffs

Drinkin 1-1 vs USAPL
Marblehead 1-0 vs USAPL
Halifax 2-0 vs USAPL

Oh wait, you meant USAPL qualified with 4 teams to CPL's 3
well, you got me on that one
 
Gart888
things!
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by avgbrad

CPL was responsible for all 4 USAPL losses in the playoffs


My favorite fact of the bunch.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.