Originally posted by jktooley
anybody NOT running Slam (it's STRONG I by the way retards) is stupid...
If you allow yourself to get beat by not running it yourself, you're an idiot... I would rather have the game come down to a coin-flip, then lose trying to "play the game right"....
If we had run Strong I Slam fulltime against MM I don't see any way we beat them. There are about 10-15 plays (both running and passing) that can be just as successful as the Strong I slam if you have the right personnel and run them at the right time.
We put up nearly 600 yards of offense against MM, which was a hell of a lot more than ANY of the Strong I slam teams put up and still controlled the ball for nearly 2/3rds of the game.
If running the same play all game was our best chance for success, I'd do it in a heartbeat, but that's not the case for everyone.
anybody NOT running Slam (it's STRONG I by the way retards) is stupid...
If you allow yourself to get beat by not running it yourself, you're an idiot... I would rather have the game come down to a coin-flip, then lose trying to "play the game right"....
If we had run Strong I Slam fulltime against MM I don't see any way we beat them. There are about 10-15 plays (both running and passing) that can be just as successful as the Strong I slam if you have the right personnel and run them at the right time.
We put up nearly 600 yards of offense against MM, which was a hell of a lot more than ANY of the Strong I slam teams put up and still controlled the ball for nearly 2/3rds of the game.
If running the same play all game was our best chance for success, I'd do it in a heartbeat, but that's not the case for everyone.