User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > USA A Leagues > USA A #4 > USA A #4 Rankings Week 9
Page:
 
Bears Rule
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by trojans4me
Originally posted by Bears Rule

Originally posted by Rod Long


77 yards against. Another shutout. Thats 10 points allowed in six games.

And just a solid defense and a decent running game. hehehe.

Please underestimate us. Please.

Still hoping for that Colley Matrix of a Strength of Schedule and winning percentage power ranking



You dont feel I made a fair representation of power rankings? Its funny that everyone decides the Grizzlies are overrated yet they were apparently a big enough win for the Sharks to catapult them into a top ranking...


Personally I think your rankings were spot on. Doomsday Sin might actually be a better team than us, we really lucked out beating them. The East #1-#7 is really tough in my opinion. With you guys adding the two level 16 LB and DE,(not sure why the Detroit Revolvers made that trade especially since the players you traded are both lower level and are from owners that GM your team), your defense should be even tougher than it was before.


they made the trade because they got 4 solid players for 2 that wanted out. It was actually a solid trade...its just too bad they are in Pro and literally suck ass even with all that talent.
 
Rod Long
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by coachviking
Hey Rod one quick thing I can really see Howwith 6-14s and 1-15 you feel your better than a team with 7-14s, 6-15s, 8-16s and 1 17. Yeah no doubt you have more skill than us not to mention how many BOOSTS we have left. HOPE TO PLAY YOU SOMEDAY>

JIM

I've seen builds on players 2 or 3 above me that I ridicule and that we've dominated. No worries there.

I'll give that to you tho, you guys did get several more level ups last year playing in those extra games. I hope your analytical ability of the gameplay and player synergies matches your rain-man like abilities to throw out numbers. Its pretty special however. Hope that experience leaves you with something other than just a fussy sense of entitlement
 
Bears Rule
offline
Link
 
PS..i was glad to face Doomsday when we did...i felt we completely dominated the game for the most part, but feel they have gotten far better since then...not sure how I would feel seeing Rip throwing the ball against us again.
 
Rod Long
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jfbueno
http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=866&team2=900That's all I have to say at this point.


And this is exactly why your point-and-case argument makes me giggle

http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=893&team2=866
 
jfbueno
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rod Long
Originally posted by coachviking

Hey Rod one quick thing I can really see Howwith 6-14s and 1-15 you feel your better than a team with 7-14s, 6-15s, 8-16s and 1 17. Yeah no doubt you have more skill than us not to mention how many BOOSTS we have left. HOPE TO PLAY YOU SOMEDAY>

JIM

I've seen builds on players 2 or 3 above me that I ridicule and that we've dominated. No worries there.

I'll give that to you tho, you guys did get several more level ups last year playing in those extra games. I hope your analytical ability of the gameplay and player synergies matches your rain-man like abilities to throw out numbers. Its pretty special however. Hope that experience leaves you with something other than just a fussy sense of entitlement


In actuality, we hardly ever look at the matchups that GLB give. It is kind of misleading in a sense. We have the number #1 rushing attack right now in the league but only ranked 27 in rushing. While some others that aren't nearly as potent are 30 even 33. As far as gameplanning goes we are relentless, nobody breaks down more film and tendacies then our coaches do. So, not saying that you are, but to those that think we just go get high levels for levels sake are gravely mistaken. Every trade or signing we make has very deep purpose and we have that new persons role already spelled out to them. If anything, our strong point is our gameplanning not our average player levels.
 
trojans4me
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bears Rule

they made the trade because they got 4 solid players for 2 that wanted out. It was actually a solid trade...its just too bad they are in Pro and literally suck ass even with all that talent.


Ah OK, thought you only gave up two players. It's a great trade for you because as soon as their contracts run out you can just bring them back to the Grizzlies. That's why I would never trade a player for a player that is owned by the same guy that GM's the team you are trading with. Chances are you will never be able to re-sign them.
 
trojans4me
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jfbueno

In actuality, we hardly ever look at the matchups that GLB give. It is kind of misleading in a sense. We have the number #1 rushing attack right now in the league but only ranked 27 in rushing. While some others that aren't nearly as potent are 30 even 33. As far as gameplanning goes we are relentless, nobody breaks down more film and tendacies then our coaches do. So, not saying that you are, but to those that think we just go get high levels for levels sake are gravely mistaken. Every trade or signing we make has very deep purpose and we have that new persons role already spelled out to them. If anything, our strong point is our gameplanning not our average player levels.


I believe it, you guys are super serial.
 
Rod Long
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bears Rule
Originally posted by Rod Long

77 yards against. Another shutout. Thats 10 points allowed in six games.

And just a solid defense and a decent running game. hehehe.

Please underestimate us. Please.

Still hoping for that Colley Matrix of a Strength of Schedule and winning percentage power ranking



You dont feel I made a fair representation of power rankings? Its funny that everyone decides the Grizzlies are overrated yet they were apparently a big enough win for the Sharks to catapult them into a top ranking...


Not for one minute do I think you are overrated. In fact, if we played ten more games against each other I think the series would likely fall 6-4 or 7-3 in our favor, but in now way would I want to have to faee your team again. I would welcome the competition and be confident, but I think that is the ultimate compliment to the Grizzlies by the Sharks. We did beat you, but I wouldn't really want to face you until 3rd round or so. Respek to Grizz.

My comment on your power rankings is based upon a strength of schedule comparison over performance. Its a much less emotionally driven analysis. But only a talking point towards the endgame anyway.
 
Rod Long
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jfbueno
Originally posted by Rod Long

Originally posted by coachviking


Hey Rod one quick thing I can really see Howwith 6-14s and 1-15 you feel your better than a team with 7-14s, 6-15s, 8-16s and 1 17. Yeah no doubt you have more skill than us not to mention how many BOOSTS we have left. HOPE TO PLAY YOU SOMEDAY>

JIM

I've seen builds on players 2 or 3 above me that I ridicule and that we've dominated. No worries there.

I'll give that to you tho, you guys did get several more level ups last year playing in those extra games. I hope your analytical ability of the gameplay and player synergies matches your rain-man like abilities to throw out numbers. Its pretty special however. Hope that experience leaves you with something other than just a fussy sense of entitlement


In actuality, we hardly ever look at the matchups that GLB give. It is kind of misleading in a sense. We have the number #1 rushing attack right now in the league but only ranked 27 in rushing. While some others that aren't nearly as potent are 30 even 33. As far as gameplanning goes we are relentless, nobody breaks down more film and tendacies then our coaches do. So, not saying that you are, but to those that think we just go get high levels for levels sake are gravely mistaken. Every trade or signing we make has very deep purpose and we have that new persons role already spelled out to them. If anything, our strong point is our gameplanning not our average player levels.


Well thats what I wanted punkin, not some default like this

Originally posted by jfbueno

http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=866&team2=900That'sall I have to say at this point.


or this

Originally posted by coachviking
Hey Rod one quick thing I can really see Howwith 6-14s and 1-15 you feel your better than a team with 7-14s, 6-15s, 8-16s and 1 17. Yeah no doubt you have more skill than us not to mention how many BOOSTS we have left. HOPE TO PLAY YOU SOMEDAY>

JIM


At least your smack talk is improving against better competition in that arena as well. *hugz*
 
jfbueno
offline
Link
 
Both Coach and I talk our fair amount of smack in good fun, but when it's all boiled down, we're at work in the "lab" for the next game.
 
Bears Rule
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by trojans4me
Originally posted by Bears Rule


they made the trade because they got 4 solid players for 2 that wanted out. It was actually a solid trade...its just too bad they are in Pro and literally suck ass even with all that talent.


Ah OK, thought you only gave up two players. It's a great trade for you because as soon as their contracts run out you can just bring them back to the Grizzlies. That's why I would never trade a player for a player that is owned by the same guy that GM's the team you are trading with. Chances are you will never be able to re-sign them.


Not so true...im trying to get rid of my own players...if that team gets better they would certainly be welcome to resigning our guys...just the fact that I dont see them getting too much better in PRO league.
 
Bears Rule
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Rod Long
Originally posted by Bears Rule

Originally posted by Rod Long


77 yards against. Another shutout. Thats 10 points allowed in six games.

And just a solid defense and a decent running game. hehehe.

Please underestimate us. Please.

Still hoping for that Colley Matrix of a Strength of Schedule and winning percentage power ranking



You dont feel I made a fair representation of power rankings? Its funny that everyone decides the Grizzlies are overrated yet they were apparently a big enough win for the Sharks to catapult them into a top ranking...


Not for one minute do I think you are overrated. In fact, if we played ten more games against each other I think the series would likely fall 6-4 or 7-3 in our favor, but in now way would I want to have to faee your team again. I would welcome the competition and be confident, but I think that is the ultimate compliment to the Grizzlies by the Sharks. We did beat you, but I wouldn't really want to face you until 3rd round or so. Respek to Grizz.

My comment on your power rankings is based upon a strength of schedule comparison over performance. Its a much less emotionally driven analysis. But only a talking point towards the endgame anyway.


Hats off to you Long...its really hard to rank 32 teams...i just have to go by guy instinct and let the shit play out you know what I mean? I think its pretty closely put though...speaking of which, i finished the news and rankings for week 10...ENJOY!
 
Bears Rule
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jfbueno
but when it's all boiled down, we're at work in the "lab" for the next game.


Do you turn the lights down low and light the candles to set the mood too?
 
lawdog
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jfbueno

Thats nothing compared to the game of the year so far. Bengals vs. Monkeys.


If we play like we did today, it will be the ass whippen of the year.
Last edited May 13, 2008 17:34:46
 
jfbueno
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by lawdog
Originally posted by jfbueno


Thats nothing compared to the game of the year so far. Bengals vs. Monkeys.


If we play like we did today, it will be the ass whippen of the year.


Chill law, that was a pretty fluke game, I expect both of our team's "A" game.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.