Ah, I remember being young and naive enough to think that there were "good" and "bad" candidates, and being proud of who I voted for. At this point I just try to pick the guys who I think will get away with less crooked behavior, so I tend to vote for opposing parties in the White House and on Capitol Hill. So long as the guys making the decisions aren't buddies, it's harder to give their big donors huge advantages hidden in each law that gets signed. The best plausible situation is for opposing parties to control one side of Congress apiece, but that's rarely possible lately.
Originally posted by RTJakarta
Lol. My prospective career path isn't going to get me $250k.You might be surprised RT. The USA has followed a policy to intentionally devalue the dollar for many, many decades and there's no reason to change that now. Hint: one effective way to control the dollar's value is to tie it to something with a fixed value, such as an hour of untrained labor. We have many other methods but suffice it to say that we benefit from gradually devaluing our currency so long as other nations retain significant holdings in dollars, so you can expect to be making well over $250k/year in your lifetime. It just won't be worth as much as you might have thought lol.
Also, recall that the cost of living varies greatly from locality to locality. For example, I imagine very few pharmacists in Manhattan are making less than $250k/year.
OK, today's dose of cynism is over. Carry on.