User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Sithas~Cult~
FireDown!
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by driftinggrifter
Originally posted by Sithas

Originally posted by JcWildcat


41/42 for, 13 against.

Dropped a note in one of threads Bort seems to have been frequenting in, let him know more votes happened and that we'd like to know either way a for sure answer. I'd like to stop keeping track of the tally, but makes sense for me to do it since I have the teams written down that have voted.


Originally posted by Bort


Looks like a lot of requests to be included in the shuffle script for this tier, 'specially since there were all the CPU's and such from last season's promotions getting moved down.

I would need a large majority of team owners or GM's in this league tier to approve this to make it happen. It would not happen on day 43, since I don't want to spring it suddenly and with no chance to set your level settings, but we could do it later in the offseason like day 44.

Please post a link to your team here if you approve of this, but ONLY if you're a team owner or GM in this league. Random players and people from other leagues need not apply. Thanks!


Where are you getting your numbers?? Where does it say each team owner/GM's only get one vote? Stop trying to finally have a winning season for once buy smudging the numbers.



Idiot, we had a winning season the last two seasons.
season 7 http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?season=7&team_id=4126
season 8 http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=4126

Remember, we even killed your team.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=405958



This is your team dumbass

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=1110

3-13.

don't be giving anyone advice on how GLB is to be played/ran.

the other team you are on, the wolfpack, only got lucky cause our AI was messed up along with the depth chart, you already know that.

But to borts post, it does not say anything about 1 vote, all you ppl are assuming. Maybe he wants to hear from teh active ppl first of all.
 
AngryDragon
offline
Link
 
^ True he does not mention how many from each team. I also think he was looking for a bigger total number of votes. I think we only covered about 1/5 of the league. He can take that many ways. Either not that many owners and GMs in the league read the forums. Or a larger portion of the league just do not care either way.

I think not enough people voted. There could be a bigger shock if he did do the shuffle by teams not knowing what is going on.

Its hard to guess what Bort means sometimes. LOL
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JcWildcat
42/43 for , 13 against.

And to address sithas, I've explained MULTIPLE times the process. And thank you jrry for also clarifying it.


Quote for page rollover.
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Sithas.....counting more than one vote for each team would be a huge exploit of the system BECAUSE everyone could go sign everyone they knew to a team as a GM and tell them to vote one way or the other. I appreciate you trying to discount my hard work though to be unbiased in tallying the votes.

Last edited Apr 11, 2009 06:34:54
 
Godzirra
offline
Link
 
Who cares nothing is coming of this. It could be 1000-1 and you'll get the same results.
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
I'll agree with that, nothing seems to happen but you never know with Bort.
 
Godzirra
offline
Link
 
And judging by the recent announcement, he's been spending time lately creating plays. So he started a poll thread, just to make it seem like he cares about the fate of teams that are outleveled by 21, then disappears. It keeps the people pacified.

Like in ancient times when the Colosseum was created to keep the minds of the public off politics and on sports. Divert their attention from the "real" issues and on "crap" that won't cause an uprising.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Sithas
Originally posted by driftinggrifter

Originally posted by Sithas


Originally posted by JcWildcat



41/42 for, 13 against.

Dropped a note in one of threads Bort seems to have been frequenting in, let him know more votes happened and that we'd like to know either way a for sure answer. I'd like to stop keeping track of the tally, but makes sense for me to do it since I have the teams written down that have voted.


Originally posted by Bort



Looks like a lot of requests to be included in the shuffle script for this tier, 'specially since there were all the CPU's and such from last season's promotions getting moved down.

I would need a large majority of team owners or GM's in this league tier to approve this to make it happen. It would not happen on day 43, since I don't want to spring it suddenly and with no chance to set your level settings, but we could do it later in the offseason like day 44.

Please post a link to your team here if you approve of this, but ONLY if you're a team owner or GM in this league. Random players and people from other leagues need not apply. Thanks!


Where are you getting your numbers?? Where does it say each team owner/GM's only get one vote? Stop trying to finally have a winning season for once buy smudging the numbers.



Idiot, we had a winning season the last two seasons.
season 7 http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?season=7&team_id=4126
season 8 http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=4126

Remember, we even killed your team.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=405958



This is your team dumbass

http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=1110

3-13.

don't be giving anyone advice on how GLB is to be played/ran.

the other team you are on, the wolfpack, only got lucky cause our AI was messed up along with the depth chart, you already know that.

But to borts post, it does not say anything about 1 vote, all you ppl are assuming. Maybe he wants to hear from teh active ppl first of all.




You really aren't that bright are you.
You told JCW that she is skewing the numbers so that she can have a winning season. I then post links to our winning seasons. (Yes I am on the Wolfpack so that makes it my team as well)
I know, logic is something that doesn't prevail in your thinking. But I'm sure you will get smarter eventually.


Renegades 3-13
Wolfpack vs Czech 1-0
Last edited Apr 11, 2009 08:52:01
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Let alone if I were "skewing" the numbers, it would be in the against factor anyway (since I am against it). Which from what PD said is what "his owner" aka Mith said to come in here and do.

Whether the CY folks want to believe it or not, I did this tally in an unbiased fair manner and it took time to do.

42/43 for , 13 against.
 
Kenshinzen
offline
Link
 
Agreed, all fair with the numbers. Thank you for your efforts.
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Kenshinzen
Agreed, all fair with the numbers. Thank you for your efforts.


No problem
 
23yrwej
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Sithas

But to borts post, it does not say anything about 1 vote, all you ppl are assuming. Maybe he wants to hear from teh active ppl first of all.


Originally posted by Bort
Originally posted by JcWildcat
36 for it , 13 against it.


After the tedious work of writing down the team name and league number (as sometimes names are duplicated I wanted to make CERTAIN I counted correctly this time around). I even gave the for it the votes that didn't say which way as I'm sure they would say no if they were against it.

Again, thanks to those that tried to stack it (get the numbers higher), it almost worked. Number is still more for it than against it. And now I have the teams down that have had a vote. (hell I might be more thorough than Bort here)



I want to thank JcWildcat for his hard work of doing the tallying - much appreciated, man!

You guys are not making this easy on me...26% of the vote says no, and I was hoping to see more like 90% for it and 10 against to make me think about going back on things.


Also, another wrench: I was just discussing this in regard to next season's structure update and doing a shuffle in the non-bottom tier here, with 16 BBBs below is possibly going to cause problems for the restructure setup, as in long term it would quite possibly cause more issues than you are seeing today, making us promote entire BBB leagues up to take over the CPU leagues that would be created and such. You have to realize that this shuffling thing is merely to get us ready to go for a much bigger restructure.



Bort obviously agreed with how JC was counting it.
Last edited Apr 11, 2009 09:10:30
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by Bort

Originally posted by JcWildcat

36 for it , 13 against it.


After the tedious work of writing down the team name and league number (as sometimes names are duplicated I wanted to make CERTAIN I counted correctly this time around). I even gave the for it the votes that didn't say which way as I'm sure they would say no if they were against it.

Again, thanks to those that tried to stack it (get the numbers higher), it almost worked. Number is still more for it than against it. And now I have the teams down that have had a vote. (hell I might be more thorough than Bort here)



I want to thank JcWildcat for his hard work of doing the tallying - much appreciated, man!

You guys are not making this easy on me...26% of the vote says no, and I was hoping to see more like 90% for it and 10 against to make me think about going back on things.

Also, another wrench: I was just discussing this in regard to next season's structure update and doing a shuffle in the non-bottom tier here, with 16 BBBs below is possibly going to cause problems for the restructure setup, as in long term it would quite possibly cause more issues than you are seeing today, making us promote entire BBB leagues up to take over the CPU leagues that would be created and such. You have to realize that this shuffling thing is merely to get us ready to go for a much bigger restructure.




Yeah I saw that, someone asked after he posted this if that meant no, and didn't say lol. So, just keeping track for whenever Bort decides to come back in.
 
JcWildcat
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jrry32

Bort obviously agreed with how JC was counting it.


That's the way I took it as well.
 
Godzirra
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JcWildcat
Originally posted by jrry32


Bort obviously agreed with how JC was counting it.


That's the way I took it as well.


At least you guys should be grateful that he's looking into it... or at least looked a few days ago . Heisn't even considering EEAA where there is as much of a problem... if not more.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.