User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > General Discussion > The "Random crap that isn't worth a thread" thread
Page:
 
rams78110
ROIT
offline
Link
 
Shizzel: that's all that came of it? That seems like a legitimate reason to fault an employer for wrongful termination. Good job putting her on blast on the news tho
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by rams78110
Shizzel: that's all that came of it? That seems like a legitimate reason to fault an employer for wrongful termination. Good job putting her on blast on the news tho


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At-will_employment
 
foshizzel17
my drizzt
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by rams78110
Shizzel: that's all that came of it? That seems like a legitimate reason to fault an employer for wrongful termination. Good job putting her on blast on the news tho


Supposedly, the news anchor also interview a famous lawyer(Lisa Lanier) in our area, and was trying to get a comment form a State Legislator about the labor laws and how they could be changed to give working mothers more security. If nothing else, it will give the Foster parenting programs some good publicity.
 
Link
 
Hey Hey Hey.... FAT ALBERT!
 
Cuivienen
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by rams78110
Who texts someone bad news? That's just an awful person.

Texting is more economical in the sense that you're not tied to the conversation. You can pause it to drive or do something if you need, you can respond bits at a time, and you can actually think more about a response. With a phonecall it's kind of all in that one interaction and like an in-person conversation you have to respond right away, you have to make everything else wait while you're on the call


I love how people think it is difficult to talk.
 
foshizzel17
my drizzt
offline
Link
 
My wife was just on the 10:00 News, a pretty big story too(about workers rights in a 'Right to Work' state).


now I have to listen to her phone blow up for the next 2 hrs(her ring tone is Wiggle by Jason Derullo)


...........
 
Cuivienen
offline
Link
 
God damn commies.
 
Hugh Morris
Hug J
offline
Link
 
Good thing I signed a contract with Burger King.

 
Link
 
Originally posted by Cuivienen
I love how people think it is difficult to talk.


Exactly. Its "difficult" to talk, but magically *not* difficult to trade a seemingly endless trail of texts because its so hard to negotiate stuff in a text message trail.
Edited by Larry Roadgrader on Jul 8, 2015 22:06:37
 
Link
 
This plain (ugly?) bitch's name keeps coming up around here as if she's "hot".

Not only is she not "hot", she's an anti-American piece of crap as well: http://freebeacon.com/culture/high-profile-hillary-clinton-supporter-i-hate-americans-i-hate-america/
 
rams78110
ROIT
offline
Link
 
So we ran our quarterly report yesterday to decide whether we needed to move anything around in the pharmacy based on how many prescriptions we sell.

In order our top 3 were;
Norco 5-325 (generic version, we don't generally carry brand name C2 drugs)
Tramadol 50mg
Percocet 5-325 (generic)

That's two Schedule II narcotic pain meds and a narcotic Schedule 4 pain med. And it wasn't even close. It was 960 something norco Rxs, 850ish Tramadol, 700ish percocet, and in 4th place was atorvastatin (Lipitor) with about 500. I had the general feeling that's how it would be given that I fill a ton of prescriptions and it feels like every other one is a controlled med, but dear lord we fill so many pain meds compared to everything else.
Edited by rams78110 on Jul 9, 2015 07:55:34
 
rams78110
ROIT
offline
Link
 
Lolol as I post that I see an ad for a drug on TV targeted to opioid-induced constipation. Not just any constipation. They assume there are enough people taking them to advertise a drug based on a side effect of opioid pain meds.
 
Cuivienen
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by rams78110
Lolol as I post that I see an ad for a drug on TV targeted to opioid-induced constipation. Not just any constipation. They assume there are enough people taking them to advertise a drug based on a side effect of opioid pain meds.


lol
 
Time Trial
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
This plain (ugly?) bitch's name keeps coming up around here as if she's "hot".

Not only is she not "hot", she's an anti-American piece of crap as well: http://freebeacon.com/culture/high-profile-hillary-clinton-supporter-i-hate-americans-i-hate-america/


"Some bitch who plans to vote for Hillary did some dumb bitch thing, therefore Hillary must be a dumb bitch" is the weakest fucking argument I've ever heard.

Tobey Maguire once paid a woman to bark like a seal. Would you vote for the same person that Tobey Maguire votes for?

Terrible article is terrible.

Also, can we please address the fact that Ariana Grande is indeed hot. Not just hot, but even hot for a celebrity.
 
Cuivienen
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Time Trial
"Some bitch who plans to vote for Hillary did some dumb bitch thing, therefore Hillary must be a dumb bitch" is the weakest fucking argument I've ever heard.

Tobey Maguire once paid a woman to bark like a seal. Would you vote for the same person that Tobey Maguire votes for?

Terrible article is terrible.

Also, can we please address the fact that Ariana Grande is indeed hot. Not just hot, but even hot for a celebrity.


Where did you hear that argument?

Also, I know like a dozen women within a 30 foot radius that are hotter than Grande.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.