If you do the power rankings you have to find a way to factor in depth. I have read on here some people say starters should account for 70-80% of the teams rankings.
I disagree. With very few exceptions (QB) our 2nd string plays just as many snaps if not more, than the first string. It is as close to a 50/50 split as you can get. I have a feeling that if you did a power ranking just based on starters it will not be worth a crap. THere are some teams with a lvl 12 and lvl10 starter WRs with level 2 and 3 guys as the 3rd and 4th spots. They will grade out higher than a team like mine that has 5 lvl 10 guys? Since most of my team is waiting for the play-offs to boost I think we would come in somewhere near the bottom of the power rankings as you described them.
If your going to spend a few hours actually cranking them out, make sure you have a formula that calculates depth first.
Good shit as always Corneo, I look forward to your write ups.
I disagree. With very few exceptions (QB) our 2nd string plays just as many snaps if not more, than the first string. It is as close to a 50/50 split as you can get. I have a feeling that if you did a power ranking just based on starters it will not be worth a crap. THere are some teams with a lvl 12 and lvl10 starter WRs with level 2 and 3 guys as the 3rd and 4th spots. They will grade out higher than a team like mine that has 5 lvl 10 guys? Since most of my team is waiting for the play-offs to boost I think we would come in somewhere near the bottom of the power rankings as you described them.
If your going to spend a few hours actually cranking them out, make sure you have a formula that calculates depth first.
Good shit as always Corneo, I look forward to your write ups.
