Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Originally posted by kurieg

LBs do need SAs. .

This post is just highlighting the fact you are clueless.

lol I guess he's talking about Defensive General, but he just won't say it.

Outside LBs don't need SAs whatsoever.

Originally posted by kurieg
Originally posted by Bukowski

That's what I'm saying.

Why should a RB need 2 high attributes + an SA to hold on to the ball?

61 is not High.

Build a 5 68+ attribute LB and come talk to me. You're lost and clueless.

you can have a 5 68+ Attribute LB by level 48, probably way before that.

Originally posted by kurieg
61 is not High.

Build a 5 68+ attribute LB and come talk to me. You're lost and clueless.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=594888 =p

Will be 6 once i cap jumping

Originally posted by blln4lyf
Because I don't OC and DC..

I do.

Originally posted by kurieg
Uh, nope, D MVP World League no, top 5 MLB WL last 2 seasons no. Seriously, you really don't know.

MLB is the only one you can even make an argument for needing SA's.

Originally posted by kurieg
LBs do need SAs. .

I knew there had to be a reason why you guys got beat so bad by drygerian

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Originally posted by kurieg

LBs do need SAs. .

This post is just highlighting the fact you are clueless.


Do you really need to go there? kurieg is one of the sharpest people in this game.

If you disagree with him it doesn't make you wrong, but you would do well to rethink your position.

Originally posted by StoutOne
you can have a 5 68+ Attribute LB by level 48, probably way before that.

These guys are shedding vast tears over getting an attribute to 61. I was taking it easy on them.

Originally posted by tautology
Originally posted by Phil Jackson

Originally posted by kurieg


LBs do need SAs. .

This post is just highlighting the fact you are clueless.


Do you really need to go there? kurieg is one of the sharpest people in this game.

If you disagree with him it doesn't make you wrong, but you would do well to rethink your position.



He called me clueless, which is why people jumped in.

He started with the infantile name calling.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by blln4lyf

Replace "fake" with leading to the defender to lose balance. A four year old baby CAN turn and cause even a grown man(usually the dad) planning on the ground with him to reach in the wrong direction.
Already happens in the sim, as I keep saying again and again and again. Moreover, you guys really shouldn't use the word "fake" if you don't mean what a "fake" signifies in GLB.


Originally posted by jrry32

This is true but the problem is if you can't shrink the guy while making those cuts. Do you really think that guys never fall down or lose their balance while trying to change their direction after a HB makes a great cutback?
*sigh* Pursuing defenders with insufficient agility already slow down considerably when attempting to mirror a ball carrier making a significant change of direction. That's already in there. You don't need the dot to freeze or shrink, since that's not even realistic.

Except dots shrinking or freezing are ones who lost their balance which is realistic. If elusive HBs can't fake without SAs, then Power HBs shouldn't break tackles without SAs.

Originally posted by kurieg
Originally posted by StoutOne

you can have a 5 68+ Attribute LB by level 48, probably way before that.

These guys are shedding vast tears over getting an attribute to 61. I was taking it easy on them.

No one said 61 of anything is high.

That wasn't the fucking argument, and you know it.

Originally posted by David Stern
I knew there had to be a reason why you guys got beat so bad by drygerian

Ya, 40+% Break tackle gear.

There's a reason why Elusive is called "elusive" and Power is called "power." Bort could have named them "fake" instead of "elusive," but he didn't. Elusive running means to elude defenders by moving away from and around them. Faking defenders is a completely separate skill that is not eluding defenders at all, it's causing those defenders to become immobile.

Originally posted by Bukowski
No one said 61 of anything is high.

That wasn't the fucking argument, and you know it.

What?

You guys told me it was super high. Like a massive number that was out of reach. You've spent pages crying about it.

Originally posted by tautology

Do you really need to go there? kurieg is one of the sharpest people in this game.

If you disagree with him it doesn't make you wrong, but you would do well to rethink your position.



Originally posted by kurieg
These guys are shedding vast tears over getting an attribute to 61. I was taking it easy on them.

This is after the fact that vision should help your build past 61 not hurt it, carrying 68-73 and speed/agility 77+.

AND GETTING HIGH SA's