ups
tjsexkitten82
offline
offline
Originally posted by IHasUsername
ups
dude im totally waiting on 2 packages from them
ups
dude im totally waiting on 2 packages from them
xTrav
offline
offline
Originally posted by tjking82
Originally posted by Sir William PD
We're trying to rebuild a team from the ground up and will game plan every game with the intention of winning. We won't line up every play for a FG or start a DT as the QB. In the NFL every team needs to go through a rebuilding phase. This is ours. In 5-6 more seasons most of these teams will be thinking about it as well when players decline.
You are just an ass that doesn't deserve a team.
Gameplanning will not turn your level 1s into level 31s. You will still lose every game terribly, screw the stats of the entire league, and you know this going in. Now I'm not judging you, I think you have every right to do whatever the hell you want with your team. But from the comments I've received all year long, most do not agree with me on that stance.
Originally posted by davitrav30
Originally posted by tjking82
Classy move, gutting a team in your own league. That's even worse than what I did - I didn't know I was coming here, I wanted an expansion team.
What exactly did you do that was worse ? Fill us in on the dirt.
Reading comprehension FAIL.
Originally posted by Doomsday
I like his one post better than your 15+ or so.
This validates me tbh
I was simply asking what you did. If it was team gutting then you need to be banned from GLB immediately.
Originally posted by Sir William PD
We're trying to rebuild a team from the ground up and will game plan every game with the intention of winning. We won't line up every play for a FG or start a DT as the QB. In the NFL every team needs to go through a rebuilding phase. This is ours. In 5-6 more seasons most of these teams will be thinking about it as well when players decline.
You are just an ass that doesn't deserve a team.
Gameplanning will not turn your level 1s into level 31s. You will still lose every game terribly, screw the stats of the entire league, and you know this going in. Now I'm not judging you, I think you have every right to do whatever the hell you want with your team. But from the comments I've received all year long, most do not agree with me on that stance.
Originally posted by davitrav30
Originally posted by tjking82
Classy move, gutting a team in your own league. That's even worse than what I did - I didn't know I was coming here, I wanted an expansion team.
What exactly did you do that was worse ? Fill us in on the dirt.
Reading comprehension FAIL.
Originally posted by Doomsday
I like his one post better than your 15+ or so.
This validates me tbh
I was simply asking what you did. If it was team gutting then you need to be banned from GLB immediately.
tjsexkitten82
offline
offline
Originally posted by davitrav30
I was simply asking what you did. If it was team gutting then you need to be banned from GLB immediately.
When I got this team, most of the players on the team were inactive or disgruntled, and I traded them away. I tried to go about it the best way possible, and I let each of them choose their trade destination. Further, because I didn't trade them with a mind to drain this team and enhance another, it wasn't gutting. I didn't trade them to the same team, nor did I trade them for insufficient value.
I then filled the empty team with my own players. Totally within the rules in all respects.
I was simply asking what you did. If it was team gutting then you need to be banned from GLB immediately.
When I got this team, most of the players on the team were inactive or disgruntled, and I traded them away. I tried to go about it the best way possible, and I let each of them choose their trade destination. Further, because I didn't trade them with a mind to drain this team and enhance another, it wasn't gutting. I didn't trade them to the same team, nor did I trade them for insufficient value.
I then filled the empty team with my own players. Totally within the rules in all respects.
ddingo
offline
offline
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Miyuso
offline
offline
I'm going to say goodbye too. J Villans are getting sold back at the end of the season, and I'm off for greener pastuers in South East Asia.
Best thing about SEA? No Davitrav30
Best thing about SEA? No Davitrav30
Sir William PD
offline
offline
Originally posted by Miyuso
I'm going to say goodbye too. J Villans are getting sold back at the end of the season, and I'm off for greener pastuers in South East Asia.
Best thing about SEA? No Davitrav30
Say it isn't so...
I'm going to say goodbye too. J Villans are getting sold back at the end of the season, and I'm off for greener pastuers in South East Asia.
Best thing about SEA? No Davitrav30
Say it isn't so...
Fat Banana
offline
offline
Originally posted by thegreenbastard
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
correlation does not equal causation.
I didn't say it did. When I said correlation I meant, well, correlation. Everyone can draw their own conclusions on causation.
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
correlation does not equal causation.
I didn't say it did. When I said correlation I meant, well, correlation. Everyone can draw their own conclusions on causation.
Fat Banana
offline
offline
Originally posted by ddingo
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Last season when we had 1 RB on the roster it wouldn't be uncommon for a WR to be substituted into the game for the RB. This was especially frustrating in goal line situations. Was this the reason we lost to the Kingz in the conference championship game? I don't know, but I'm sure it didn't help.
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Last season when we had 1 RB on the roster it wouldn't be uncommon for a WR to be substituted into the game for the RB. This was especially frustrating in goal line situations. Was this the reason we lost to the Kingz in the conference championship game? I don't know, but I'm sure it didn't help.
Sir William PD
offline
offline
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by ddingo
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Last season when we had 1 RB on the roster it wouldn't be uncommon for a WR to be substituted into the game for the RB. This was especially frustrating in goal line situations. Was this the reason we lost to the Kingz in the conference championship game? I don't know, but I'm sure it didn't help.
Why didn't you put your FB or TE in the #2 RB position?
Originally posted by ddingo
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Last season when we had 1 RB on the roster it wouldn't be uncommon for a WR to be substituted into the game for the RB. This was especially frustrating in goal line situations. Was this the reason we lost to the Kingz in the conference championship game? I don't know, but I'm sure it didn't help.
Why didn't you put your FB or TE in the #2 RB position?
PhireHawk
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sir William PD
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by ddingo
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Last season when we had 1 RB on the roster it wouldn't be uncommon for a WR to be substituted into the game for the RB. This was especially frustrating in goal line situations. Was this the reason we lost to the Kingz in the conference championship game? I don't know, but I'm sure it didn't help.
Why didn't you put your FB or TE in the #2 RB position?
If they did that, they wouldn't have an excuse to fall back on...
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by ddingo
Originally posted by Fat Banana
When our team chemistry was in the 20's our team was not successful at all on the field. As our chemistry recovered our team seemed to execute plays more successfully on the field. Maybe it is a coincidence but there is a correlation.
1 RB on the roster was the davitrav excuse in another thread. With all the excuses, it gets difficult to know which card is being played to justify a particular loss.
Last season when we had 1 RB on the roster it wouldn't be uncommon for a WR to be substituted into the game for the RB. This was especially frustrating in goal line situations. Was this the reason we lost to the Kingz in the conference championship game? I don't know, but I'm sure it didn't help.
Why didn't you put your FB or TE in the #2 RB position?
If they did that, they wouldn't have an excuse to fall back on...
Sir William PD
offline
offline
Originally posted by PhireHawk
If they did that, they wouldn't have an excuse to fall back on...
Oooooh I get it...
If they did that, they wouldn't have an excuse to fall back on...
Oooooh I get it...
Beaker
offline
offline
Originally posted by Miyuso
I'm going to say goodbye too. J Villans are getting sold back at the end of the season, and I'm off for greener pastuers in South East Asia.
Best thing about SEA? No Davitrav30
Noooo! I still love you J Vil!
I'm going to say goodbye too. J Villans are getting sold back at the end of the season, and I'm off for greener pastuers in South East Asia.
Best thing about SEA? No Davitrav30
Noooo! I still love you J Vil!
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
