Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Kensham
I actually think its a great strategy. To put your QB in the best situation he can possibly be in. I would have done the same thing because now we know that he will more than likely be the best QB in the league playing against our defenses. He might even have his own SB ring after this season. Can anyone say league MVP? Anyways I dont see why any of you are complaining about him demoting his player to this league because it is an amazing idea. Think about it if your QB was one of the worst in a certain situation wouldnt you take advantage of the various leagues in the game? You should all want to put your player in the best possible situation and if you wouldnt then why do you play this? Point made. He made the best decision for his player and we should all deal with it and be happy we have more competition.

Not against us.

Originally posted by sturge


Not against us.



So you arent in ANY way scared of a level 27 QB?

Originally posted by Kensham
Originally posted by sturge



Not against us.



So you arent in ANY way scared of a level 27 QB?

It's the players around him that dictate whether or not you have to be afraid of something.

Originally posted by griz
Originally posted by Kensham

Originally posted by sturge




Not against us.



So you arent in ANY way scared of a level 27 QB?

It's the players around him that dictate whether or not you have to be afraid of something.

Yes but the Bears were impressive last year as well but they had a tough shedule. I could see them going to the conference game or even the SB now.

We'll all have a good opportunity to see just how much chemistry matters. My team plays the Bears in 2 days. They outmatch us 39 to 33. Our Chemistry is 72. Theirs is 13. We'll see what happens.

We are talking about the same Bears team that lost 9-28 to the Gangbangers right? and their overall is 30 compared to the Bears 39.

Really guys, you honestly think just because they have a 27 QB that they are now the class of the East? They did a great recruiting job, but it takes a lot more than just signing high level players to be a competitive team.

but to answer your question Ken, no, I am not the least worried about the Bears much less their level 27 QB.That is by no means an attack on the Bears, like I said they did a great recruiting job and I look forward to our matchup.

Honestly, I don't Think the scrimmage games are a good measure to figure out how good a team really is. I know my team is using this time to test a few things out before the regular season starts. With all of teams trying to figure out what works for them, and where they need improvement, I think that any team that actually cares about gameplanning is going to do much better in the regular season then their scrimmage games show. (and Yes i will preempt the inevitable question: You lost your scrimmage game didn't you? Yes we did, but thats all for the above reasons).

It's not quite as bad as one team in my team's league. They went out and signed about half of a US AA team because they lost in the playoffs to us 40-3. They couldn't hack it in USA AA apparently and the owner had a player there so he started talking to them early about it. It is rather annoying because I want to say "Do things the right way to build a winning franchise." I hope they lose a couple game and they bail on the owner to teach him a lesson.

Originally posted by libertylane
Honestly, I don't Think the scrimmage games are a good measure to figure out how good a team really is. I know my team is using this time to test a few things out before the regular season starts. With all of teams trying to figure out what works for them, and where they need improvement, I think that any team that actually cares about gameplanning is going to do much better in the regular season then their scrimmage games show. (and Yes i will preempt the inevitable question: You lost your scrimmage game didn't you? Yes we did, but thats all for the above reasons).

everyone should be, god knows the new advanced tactics are screwy as hell.I planned out our game against the Maulers totally different than how it was played.

The Volomgs Vs. The Assassins is going to be a good game. I think the Assassins will take it for the west this year. They have a great team. Of course I would like them to fail horribly but they have already beat the Sundowners and they have the toughest srimmage games because they face the Vikings next.

Originally posted by Kensham
The Volomgs Vs. The Assassins is going to be a good game. I think the Assassins will take it for the west this year. They have a great team. Of course I would like them to fail horribly but they have already beat the Sundowners and they have the toughest srimmage games because they face the Vikings next.

We are not playing scrimmage games to "beat" anyone.This is the last free game before the season starts so we will use it for testing, just like the last game.I am pretty excited to see how well the new tactics work against a team like the Assassins.

Should be fun.

.

Originally posted by Exar0s
everyone should be, god knows the new advanced tactics are screwy as hell.I planned out our game against the Maulers totally different than how it was played.

Maybe you should do that more often

Originally posted by Kensham
I actually think its a great strategy. To put your QB in the best situation he can possibly be in. I would have done the same thing because now we know that he will more than likely be the best QB in the league playing against our defenses. He might even have his own SB ring after this season. Can anyone say league MVP? Anyways I dont see why any of you are complaining about him demoting his player to this league because it is an amazing idea. Think about it if your QB was one of the worst in a certain situation wouldnt you take advantage of the various leagues in the game? You should all want to put your player in the best possible situation and if you wouldnt then why do you play this? Point made. He made the best decision for his player and we should all deal with it and be happy we have more competition.

So you would rather place yourself in a pickup basketball game against a bunch of 2nd graders rather than you peers? Since you want the best situation to put yourself in a everything.

Originally posted by JSin
Originally posted by Kensham

I actually think its a great strategy. To put your QB in the best situation he can possibly be in. I would have done the same thing because now we know that he will more than likely be the best QB in the league playing against our defenses. He might even have his own SB ring after this season. Can anyone say league MVP? Anyways I dont see why any of you are complaining about him demoting his player to this league because it is an amazing idea. Think about it if your QB was one of the worst in a certain situation wouldnt you take advantage of the various leagues in the game? You should all want to put your player in the best possible situation and if you wouldnt then why do you play this? Point made. He made the best decision for his player and we should all deal with it and be happy we have more competition.

So you would rather place yourself in a pickup basketball game against a bunch of 2nd graders rather than you peers? Since you want the best situation to put yourself in a everything.


+1.