"Give me some yum yum..."
stamango
offline
offline
Originally posted by Bountytaker
Officially:
1. If 2 teams tied, head-to-head
2. If >2 teams tied, team with most head-to-head wins within the group.
3. If still tied, most points scored
4. If still tied, most points against.
The man is correct
Officially:
1. If 2 teams tied, head-to-head
2. If >2 teams tied, team with most head-to-head wins within the group.
3. If still tied, most points scored
4. If still tied, most points against.
The man is correct
kamf1978
offline
offline
Originally posted by stamango
Originally posted by Bountytaker
Officially:
1. If 2 teams tied, head-to-head
2. If >2 teams tied, team with most head-to-head wins within the group.
3. If still tied, most points scored
4. If still tied, most points against.
The man is correct
are you sure 4 shouldn't be least points against???? Otherwise doing badly defensively as long as you win would be a good thing ie winning 66 - 63 is better than 66-0
Originally posted by Bountytaker
Officially:
1. If 2 teams tied, head-to-head
2. If >2 teams tied, team with most head-to-head wins within the group.
3. If still tied, most points scored
4. If still tied, most points against.
The man is correct
are you sure 4 shouldn't be least points against???? Otherwise doing badly defensively as long as you win would be a good thing ie winning 66 - 63 is better than 66-0
doomstar
offline
offline
Originally posted by Beaker
Originally posted by ryanbrock
Choctaw Cracker Party...it all makes sense now.
ooo. . .dude. . .
I am really ashamed of myself for even getting that joke.
... I think I just got it now too
Originally posted by ryanbrock
Choctaw Cracker Party...it all makes sense now.
ooo. . .dude. . .
I am really ashamed of myself for even getting that joke.
... I think I just got it now too
Beef Supreme
offline
offline
Originally posted by Beaker
Originally posted by ryanbrock
Choctaw Cracker Party...it all makes sense now.
ooo. . .dude. . .
I am really ashamed of myself for even getting that joke.
Ummm....joke?
Originally posted by ryanbrock
Choctaw Cracker Party...it all makes sense now.
ooo. . .dude. . .
I am really ashamed of myself for even getting that joke.
Ummm....joke?
Fat Banana
offline
offline
Originally posted by PhireHawk
Current standings reflect all tie breakers in place
Actually we may have been incorrect. If you click on the League Playoffs link on the league page it has the current seedings. Even though in the standings Milwaukee was in 4th, Madden 5th, and Goodfellas 6th on that page it had Goodfellas in the 4th seed, Milwaukee 5th and Madden 6th. In addition it had ICP in the #7 seed and Choctaw in the #8 with Windsor not seeded.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/playoff_bracket.pl?league_id=33&conference_id=66
Current standings reflect all tie breakers in place
Actually we may have been incorrect. If you click on the League Playoffs link on the league page it has the current seedings. Even though in the standings Milwaukee was in 4th, Madden 5th, and Goodfellas 6th on that page it had Goodfellas in the 4th seed, Milwaukee 5th and Madden 6th. In addition it had ICP in the #7 seed and Choctaw in the #8 with Windsor not seeded.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/playoff_bracket.pl?league_id=33&conference_id=66
Last edited Jul 11, 2008 10:41:52
Sir William PD
offline
offline
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by PhireHawk
Current standings reflect all tie breakers in place
Actually we may have been incorrect. If you click on the League Playoffs link on the league page it has the current seedings. Even though in the standings Milwaukee was in 4th, Madden 5th, and Goodfellas 6th on that page it had Goodfellas in the 4th seed, Milwaukee 5th and Madden 6th. In addition it had ICP in the #7 seed and Choctaw in the #8 with Windsor not seeded.
interesting, we'll just have to see where the chips fall after 16 games
Originally posted by PhireHawk
Current standings reflect all tie breakers in place
Actually we may have been incorrect. If you click on the League Playoffs link on the league page it has the current seedings. Even though in the standings Milwaukee was in 4th, Madden 5th, and Goodfellas 6th on that page it had Goodfellas in the 4th seed, Milwaukee 5th and Madden 6th. In addition it had ICP in the #7 seed and Choctaw in the #8 with Windsor not seeded.
interesting, we'll just have to see where the chips fall after 16 games
maytheus
offline
offline
Originally posted by Sir William PD
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by PhireHawk
Current standings reflect all tie breakers in place
Actually we may have been incorrect. If you click on the League Playoffs link on the league page it has the current seedings. Even though in the standings Milwaukee was in 4th, Madden 5th, and Goodfellas 6th on that page it had Goodfellas in the 4th seed, Milwaukee 5th and Madden 6th. In addition it had ICP in the #7 seed and Choctaw in the #8 with Windsor not seeded.
interesting, we'll just have to see where the chips fall after 16 games
I think it had not updated yet. The playoff seedings now match the standings.
Originally posted by Fat Banana
Originally posted by PhireHawk
Current standings reflect all tie breakers in place
Actually we may have been incorrect. If you click on the League Playoffs link on the league page it has the current seedings. Even though in the standings Milwaukee was in 4th, Madden 5th, and Goodfellas 6th on that page it had Goodfellas in the 4th seed, Milwaukee 5th and Madden 6th. In addition it had ICP in the #7 seed and Choctaw in the #8 with Windsor not seeded.
interesting, we'll just have to see where the chips fall after 16 games
I think it had not updated yet. The playoff seedings now match the standings.
stamango
offline
offline
I wonder if anyone can explain to me
This:
5 Yazoo City Saints 10-5-0 L1
6 Los Angeles Arsenal 10-5-0 W7
7 Dallas Annihilators 10-5-0 W2
We Beat the Arsenal. I need more information....
This:
5 Yazoo City Saints 10-5-0 L1
6 Los Angeles Arsenal 10-5-0 W7
7 Dallas Annihilators 10-5-0 W2
We Beat the Arsenal. I need more information....
stamango
offline
offline
Originally posted by Leroy Jenkins
QI believe when it is a 3 or more way tie it goes to points scored
So, we beat a team, we hold serve, and they move ahead?????
Thats bullshit
Gonna complain to the admins about this
They need to re-think this, no offense to anyone at all.
QI believe when it is a 3 or more way tie it goes to points scored
So, we beat a team, we hold serve, and they move ahead?????
Thats bullshit
Gonna complain to the admins about this
They need to re-think this, no offense to anyone at all.
Last edited Jul 11, 2008 12:02:00
Leroy Jenkins
offline
offline
Who should lead when Team A beats team B and loses to team C. Team B beats team C. Who should be top ranked? It goes to points scored. It is the only way to rank.
IHasUsername
offline
offline
In that case:
A>B
A<C
B>C
but A is still > B who is > C.
A Should lead, then B, then C. imo.
A>B
A<C
B>C
but A is still > B who is > C.
A Should lead, then B, then C. imo.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.