User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > S29 Wishlist/Suggestions?
Page:
 
TyDavis315
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
lol ya i don't think we need to buff receiving. XD


receiving is actually at a good place atm in my opinion. for the most part at least. it's annoying to see a "knocked loose" all the time though. i can understand if it's clear that the receiver got knocked the fuck out, but lately i'll see both defender and receiver fall down and then it'll say "the ball was intercepted.... but knocked loose....." or that it was caught and then knocked loose. just seems a bit glitchy to me.


 
TyDavis315
offline
Link
 
Buff LB & Safety pass play ability. Adding more interceptions doesn't change the fact that the TEs are unguardable. I don't understand how this hasn't been fixed yet.
 
Detroit Leos
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TyDavis315
Buff LB & Safety pass play ability. Adding more interceptions doesn't change the fact that the TEs are unguardable. I don't understand how this hasn't been fixed yet.


LBs for sure! Even geared toward pass defense they still get roasted!
 
Detroit Leos
offline
Link
 
Make chip shot worthwhile for kickers! Instead of raising the yards by 1 for FG distance make it 10 so bronze stays at 20 yard FG to have a chance to fire, silver goes to 30 yard FG attempt and gold goes to 40 yard FG attempts. It might make kickers actually hit the closer FGs at a good clip like they should. Hell pushing the gold to 45 would probably be even better. Not sure if there would be a ripple effect though from made FGs inside 40 affecting FG attempts beyond 40. Most misses obviously come from 40+.
Edited by Detroit Leos on Dec 6, 2017 08:05:50
 
Link
 
Originally posted by TyDavis315
receiving is actually at a good place atm in my opinion. for the most part at least. it's annoying to see a "knocked loose" all the time though. i can understand if it's clear that the receiver got knocked the fuck out, but lately i'll see both defender and receiver fall down and then it'll say "the ball was intercepted.... but knocked loose....." or that it was caught and then knocked loose. just seems a bit glitchy to me.




They need to buff zone if they buff rec catching. I get many incompletions through knock loose.
 
TyDavis315
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
They need to buff zone if they buff rec catching. I get many incompletions through knock loose.


it's different because you can actually see the receiver getting destroyed, which causes them to drop the ball. in man coverage, there's this cheesy animation were both defender and receiver fall down and then the ball is "knocked loose" as soon as the play ends
 
dlcurt
offline
Link
 
Make running a team more affordable or allow us to buy/ renew each season with players we create ourselves. Finding replacements for people who quit can be frustrating. Someone can go in more details, I’ve seen this suggested before.
 
JokersChaos
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by dlcurt
Make running a team more affordable or allow us to buy/ renew each season with players we create ourselves. Finding replacements for people who quit can be frustrating. Someone can go in more details, I’ve seen this suggested before.


Running into this problem right now
 
jakedood
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TyDavis315
Buff LB & Safety pass play ability. Adding more interceptions doesn't change the fact that the TEs are unguardable. I don't understand how this hasn't been fixed yet.


http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/262571

For a solo LB, 47 PD's and <50%, and he's not a pure coverage guy either, but it shows it is possible for a man coverage LB to do pretty well when needed
 
Team Nucleus
Draft Man
offline
Link
 
I wanta see cheerleaders on the sidelines
 
TyDavis315
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jakedood
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/262571

For a solo LB, 47 PD's and <50%, and he's not a pure coverage guy either, but it shows it is possible for a man coverage LB to do pretty well when needed


what a tough schedule

didn't seem to perform as well against better teams tbh, and one LB isn't gonna change the fact that their coverage is bad in this game. They can keep up, but not create. It takes both an LB and Safety to defend a TE and there are plenty of replays to show that even then the TE makes light work on em.
 
jakedood
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by TyDavis315
what a tough schedule

didn't seem to perform as well against better teams tbh, and one LB isn't gonna change the fact that their coverage is bad in this game. They can keep up, but not create. It takes both an LB and Safety to defend a TE and there are plenty of replays to show that even then the TE makes light work on em.


Given those stats also include multiple games v Alaskan assassins, and mostly tier up games, Im not sure that's entirely fair

And he is a hybrid coverage and run stuffer
 
Detroit Leos
offline
Link
 
He looks about as good as a combo LOLB can look. LBs are at a huge disadvantage when it comes to coverage and it does not seem to matter how much you pour in to coverage skills. That is probably the best end build that I have seen for a LOLB that is doing both coverage duties along with providing run support and not being a liability in other areas. Looks like a really nice combo build IMO.
 
jakedood
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Detroit Leos
He looks about as good as a combo LOLB can look. LBs are at a huge disadvantage when it comes to coverage and it does not seem to matter how much you pour in to coverage skills. That is probably the best end build that I have seen for a LOLB that is doing both coverage duties along with providing run support and not being a liability in other areas. Looks like a really nice combo build IMO.


Thanks bro!

Yeah im pretty happy with him in that regard, and yeah they are at an inherent disadvantage in man coverage systems but then most lbs are in football, its not a position you usually want to be marking a top receiver on their own
 
Bretto007
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jakedood
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/262571

For a solo LB, 47 PD's and <50%, and he's not a pure coverage guy either, but it shows it is possible for a man coverage LB to do pretty well when needed


I'd like to see the build but it's closed.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.