Warrior General Games

Originally posted by David146
Sorry if I was unclear. My depth chart at FB position is rFB starter and infreq substituted by bFB, no one in depth chart under HB position. This lead to the rFB getting most of the starts at HB actually and bFB getting most snaps at FB yet with each dot getting some snaps at the the opposite position too. Not very intuitive and understandably confusing. That is why it took me a game or 2 to figure what was best (and maybe someone else can find a better way).

I am sharing this to save someone some of the difficulties I had, if they chose to bag all those overrated HBs (LOL).

Why wouldn't you put the bFB at FB and leave the rFB off the depth chart all together? Wouldn't that result in him getting more snaps at HB since the rFB would never be at the FB position?

Originally posted by Rob.
Why wouldn't you put the bFB at FB and leave the rFB off the depth chart all together? Wouldn't that result in him getting more snaps at HB since the rFB would never be at the FB position?

This is what I was thinking.

Thx, I don't recall. I think I might have tried that, but it was a while ago that I settled in at this depth chart. TT has a big game vs Hawaii tomorrow. Maybe you can help with a scrim where I try your idea out. Some of your mates have been clamoring for TT to knock Hawaii out of that #1 spot, lol.

One thing they should do is make FB a tier 3 superstar. I've never understood why they made FB a tier 2 superstar. Nobody will waste a tier 2 on a FB unless they are experimenting.

I agree

Originally posted by Galactic Empire
One thing they should do is make FB a tier 3 superstar. I've never understood why they made FB a tier 2 superstar. Nobody will waste a tier 2 on a FB unless they are experimenting.

Returner FB is the one possible exception. I had one that was fairly successful. Other positions are much more important though.