Originally posted by crazieveggie
Someone would whine and want those nerfed too...
Don't you mean buffed?
Someone would whine and want those nerfed too...
Don't you mean buffed?
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > S13 Tease Time
Jagat0r
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Don't you mean buffed?
I know I prefer my cheerleaders in the buff.
Don't you mean buffed?
I know I prefer my cheerleaders in the buff.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by crazieveggie
Someone would whine and want those nerfed too...
bewbs 2 OP'd
Someone would whine and want those nerfed too...
bewbs 2 OP'd
Jagat0r
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
Some berfs and nuffs.
ANy hint on what you might barf and what you may knife?
Some berfs and nuffs.
ANy hint on what you might barf and what you may knife?
Galactic Empire
offline
offline
Originally posted by Corndog
Some berfs and nuffs.
Come on Bort. Don't tease us...errr...I mean do tease us.
Some berfs and nuffs.
Come on Bort. Don't tease us...errr...I mean do tease us.
peeti
offline
offline
I think bad chem should result in unexpected injuries...players who dont know each other are more likely to fight in the locker room I guess
Originally posted by peeti
I think bad chem should result in unexpected injuries...players who dont know each other are more likely to fight in the locker room I guess
Hmm, I kind of like that idea.
I think bad chem should result in unexpected injuries...players who dont know each other are more likely to fight in the locker room I guess
Hmm, I kind of like that idea.
TDiddy8701
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rob.
Fix chem. I have a major overhaul this offseason. Gonna need it!
THIS x 100000000000000000000000
honestly I'd be totally fine with the above fixed as well as a few additional plays (maybe some common ones flipped that favor one side of the field), and I'd be happy
Fix chem. I have a major overhaul this offseason. Gonna need it!
THIS x 100000000000000000000000
honestly I'd be totally fine with the above fixed as well as a few additional plays (maybe some common ones flipped that favor one side of the field), and I'd be happy
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Aug 21, 2015 01:08:16
Edited by TDiddy8701 on Aug 21, 2015 01:07:11
Achelon
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
I think bad chem should result in unexpected injuries...players who dont know each other are more likely to fight in the locker room I guess
Yeah my 8th string special teams only LB, should be able to knock the fuck out of my overpaid starting QB
I think bad chem should result in unexpected injuries...players who dont know each other are more likely to fight in the locker room I guess
Yeah my 8th string special teams only LB, should be able to knock the fuck out of my overpaid starting QB
Xars
offline
offline
Originally posted by peeti
I think bad chem should result in unexpected injuries...players who dont know each other are more likely to fight in the locker room I guess
Originally posted by Corndog
Hmm, I kind of like that idea.
If we had complete control of all players and teams, then maybe this would work.
But this is an MMO. You WANT interaction amongst the player base. You don't WANT agents like me only making single-agent teams. Hell, I don't want to do it either.
I just hate Chemistry that much.
Sometimes you go for realism. Sometimes you just make your user base happy.
Make Off-Season Chem at 90 and mid-season pickups at 50. Or just make everything at 100. Or something.
But we (99% of the remaining paying customers) want it gone.
So just do it already.
I think bad chem should result in unexpected injuries...players who dont know each other are more likely to fight in the locker room I guess
Originally posted by Corndog
Hmm, I kind of like that idea.
If we had complete control of all players and teams, then maybe this would work.
But this is an MMO. You WANT interaction amongst the player base. You don't WANT agents like me only making single-agent teams. Hell, I don't want to do it either.
I just hate Chemistry that much.
Sometimes you go for realism. Sometimes you just make your user base happy.
Make Off-Season Chem at 90 and mid-season pickups at 50. Or just make everything at 100. Or something.
But we (99% of the remaining paying customers) want it gone.
So just do it already.
Edited by Xars on Aug 21, 2015 07:06:18
Xars
offline
offline
Originally posted by Rob.
Fix chem. I have a major overhaul this offseason. Gonna need it!
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
THIS x 100000000000000000000000
honestly I'd be totally fine with the above fixed as well as a few additional plays (maybe some common ones flipped that favor one side of the field), and I'd be happy
And I'm totally fine with them changing over their roster and NOT taking a Chem hit.
It's a game. I want to enjoy it too.
I don't want to win against Rob and TDiddy because they are hamstrung by Chem. I'd rather beat them with both teams at full strength. I'd rather lose to them at full strength than win because of their Chemistry.
Bort/Cdog - Just ask yourself this question:
How many FLEX paying agents have I attracted/kept with GLB2 because we have Chemistry VS. How many FLEX paying agents have we lost because of the it?
If you think you have made more $$$ by having Chemistry, you are delusional.
It's cost you $$$. It's cost us a larger Community. Don't think it hasn't.
Fix chem. I have a major overhaul this offseason. Gonna need it!
Originally posted by TDiddy8701
THIS x 100000000000000000000000
honestly I'd be totally fine with the above fixed as well as a few additional plays (maybe some common ones flipped that favor one side of the field), and I'd be happy
And I'm totally fine with them changing over their roster and NOT taking a Chem hit.
It's a game. I want to enjoy it too.
I don't want to win against Rob and TDiddy because they are hamstrung by Chem. I'd rather beat them with both teams at full strength. I'd rather lose to them at full strength than win because of their Chemistry.
Bort/Cdog - Just ask yourself this question:
How many FLEX paying agents have I attracted/kept with GLB2 because we have Chemistry VS. How many FLEX paying agents have we lost because of the it?
If you think you have made more $$$ by having Chemistry, you are delusional.
It's cost you $$$. It's cost us a larger Community. Don't think it hasn't.
Edited by Xars on Aug 21, 2015 07:12:04
crazieveggie
offline
offline
Originally posted by Xars
Bort/Cdog - Just ask yourself this question:
How many FLEX paying agents have I attracted/kept with GLB2 because we have Chemistry VS. How many FLEX paying agents have we lost because of the it?
If you think you have made more $$$ by having Chemistry, you are delusional.
It's cost you $$$. It's cost us a larger Community. Don't think it hasn't.
At minimum there has to be a happy medium than the current system. I think that is an easy one.
Bort/Cdog - Just ask yourself this question:
How many FLEX paying agents have I attracted/kept with GLB2 because we have Chemistry VS. How many FLEX paying agents have we lost because of the it?
If you think you have made more $$$ by having Chemistry, you are delusional.
It's cost you $$$. It's cost us a larger Community. Don't think it hasn't.
At minimum there has to be a happy medium than the current system. I think that is an easy one.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
