Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Absolut Zero
Woh, I saw MEM's first three drives, and they were moving the ball pretty well (TD, FG, and 1 punt). Was surprised to see the box score and that's about all of the yards they had in the whole game.

Statement win by a newcomer though. Very exciting!

Its what i expected from the game, GA's a top notch defense i knew this game would be a very low scoring game however i was expecting the game to be won on a luck break out run by one of teams. Turns out the pass game did just enough.

If it weren't for 3 turnovers, Richmond would've probably lost:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/203423

From watching it, it seemed like House of Pain was the better team, minus the QB. Lots of incomplete throws at very bad times.

Originally posted by Absolut Zero
If it weren't for 3 turnovers, Richmond would've probably lost:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/203423

From watching it, it seemed like House of Pain was the better team, minus the QB. Lots of incomplete throws at very bad times.

Surprised at the yardage they got. Felt like neither team moved the ball particularly well.

That being said, they also played us very close last season (17-13 near the end of the season) - their D is really built well to stop our O.

Originally posted by FairForever
Surprised at the yardage they got. Felt like neither team moved the ball particularly well.

That being said, they also played us very close last season (17-13 near the end of the season) - their D is really built well to stop our O.

Yeah, I'm curious about your O with the new run changes, which is why I watched it. They seemed to have everything locked down for most of the game. Couldn't really tell how good/bad your O is with the new changes, since they were usually there to snuff things out before cutback decisions could even really happen.

Originally posted by Absolut Zero
If it weren't for 3 turnovers, Richmond would've probably lost:
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/203423

From watching it, it seemed like House of Pain was the better team, minus the QB. Lots of incomplete throws at very bad times.

Should be a fun league game tomorrow between MEM and All Pain tomorrow

whoa.... the new Vet teams are killing it so far... making me more nervous for our southside game

this might be the best influx of pro teams we've seen in a LONG time

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
whoa.... the new Vet teams are killing it so far... making me more nervous for our southside game

this might be the best influx of pro teams we've seen in a LONG time

Are you basing this purely off of MEM beating GA?

I think I'd still take FSM/GA/Logzilla/Winnipeg/Beers, but we'll see.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
whoa.... the new Vet teams are killing it so far... making me more nervous for our southside game

this might be the best influx of pro teams we've seen in a LONG time

Gg, frustrating to watch though, for some reason we only ran 25 times (usually closer to 40) even though the tactics encourage more running when gashing a defense like that, oh well sometimes rng just isnt on your side.

GG Southside... after our lost fumble after your TD (I think in the late 3rd), I thought you'd come back for the win... seemed like we were going down the path of the Madison/DA game last season. From what I saw, you're def a top 10 team this season.

my tactics actually lined up perfectly with my defensive playbook... I've found it hard to mix in zone with man and blitzing for multiple formations without screwing up what should be called with tactics settings. Kinda weird to think 5 man fronts can be best against 3 WR sets, while 3 man fronts can be more effective vs 2 TE sets

With 2 S*s at FS and SS this season, we are going to be able to implement a little of the 5-2 GA defense this season

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
GG Southside... after that lost fumble after your TD, I thought you'd come back for the win... seemed like we were going down the path of the Madison/DA game last season

my tactics actually lined up perfectly with my defensive playbook... I've found it hard to mix in zone with man and blitzing for multiple formations without screwing up what should be called with tactics settings. Kinda weird to think 5 man fronts can be best against 3 WR sets, while 3 man fronts can be more effective vs 2 TE sets

With 2 S*s at FS and SS this season, we are going to be able to implement a little of the 5-2 GA defense this season

The defense was interesting, i saw what you were trying to do. This game shows i have few tweaks to make but southside can hang with the big teams.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
Gg, frustrating to watch though, for some reason we only ran 25 times (usually closer to 40) even though the tactics encourage more running when gashing a defense like that, oh well sometimes rng just isnt on your side.

I see you took the high road.

Madison v Southside was a good game.

Originally posted by Rob.
I see you took the high road.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
The defense was interesting, i saw what you were trying to do. This game shows i have few tweaks to make but southside can hang with the big teams.

I have the tactics set up for as close to 50/50 as possible and 99% of games show that, however that wasnt the case this game and i haven't changed the tactics page and the lead was never big enough for trailing to kick in so what else would you call it if not rng?

GG Winnepeg. The Drunks are way too Drunk to run the ball apparently...

Would everybody say that low chemistry hurts rushing teams or passing teams more?

Originally posted by Dee.
GG Winnepeg. The Drunks are way too Drunk to run the ball apparently...

Would everybody say that low chemistry hurts rushing teams or passing teams more?

Depends on where your low chemistry players are at. Certainly hurts both.