User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > S7 - Sophomore - Power Rankings - Game 23
Page:
 
crazieveggie
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
I just held Inner City kids to 168 total yards with a zone defense.


LOL

Enjoy your gift. I changed my plays and didn't change my depth chart.. My passing QB attempted to run the ball 21 times compared to my running QB at 17. Christmas came early for ya. To much holiday Apple Pie Moonshine this weekend. Not an excuse but don't want to mislead other teams that what you did would have worked.
Edited by crazieveggie on Nov 24, 2014 06:21:59
 
Link
 
Funny...everytime I beat a higher ranked team excuses start flying.
 
crazieveggie
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galactic Empire
Funny...everytime I beat a higher ranked team excuses start flying.


Watch the game... Why would my QB with a quickness of 9 and sprinting of 8 be running the ball..... 21 times...!

Ran a quick scrimmage with a different depth chart and you did well. Congrats. Get you next time.

Edited by crazieveggie on Nov 24, 2014 07:27:58
 
Absolut Zero
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by klocc1
The RNG can kill you sometimes, kinda what I was thinking when our QB threw 2 picks in the game and only had 6 int's the first 23 games of the season. Good game though, and your team should still be top 10 or just right outside of it.


Yeah, I was pretty surprised the game had 3 interceptions total. Then again I was pretty surprised you abandoned the run.

Your team was better than mine, I've got some build/depth chart issues I need to figure out how to hide. As well as one glaring tactic error which you were able to exploit pretty easily.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by crazieveggie
Watch the game... Why would my QB with a quickness of 9 and sprinting of 8 be running the ball..... 21 times...!

Ran a quick scrimmage with a different depth chart and you did well. Congrats. Get you next time.



 
DeeVee8
Bucc'd Up
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by peeti
Never run any play that already has the word "weak" in it


I've thought this also, kind of OCD-ish. But an all rushing team has to utilize the weakside some to throw off the defense. Big I QB rollout weak rocks the house as well as weak trips.

Originally posted by Xars
Not sure why they ran TRIPS QB Rollout to the Strong side when the Weak side is where the advantage is.



Are you saying against his Zone D or in general. I've had lots of success with trips strong on WcW.

 
HayRow
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by crazieveggie
LOL

Enjoy your gift. I changed my plays and didn't change my depth chart.. My passing QB attempted to run the ball 21 times compared to my running QB at 17. Christmas came early for ya. To much holiday Apple Pie Moonshine this weekend. Not an excuse but don't want to mislead other teams that what you did would have worked.


Well it's lame that they are now allowing the split of different QBs to work. I was under the impression a few seasons ago that they didn't want to have the GL depth for QB to work like this to prevent a team from doing what you are doing.

It is the sole reason I cut the HoF leading RQB on D'Hara like 3 seasons ago.
 
mrm708
offline
Link
 
Trips strong rollout is an almost guaranteed TD against certain plays.
 
Rob.
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by mrm708
Trips strong rollout is an almost guaranteed TD against certain plays.


And almost a guaranteed tackle for loss against other plays.
 
jjet5552007
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by HayRow
Well it's lame that they are now allowing the split of different QBs to work. I was under the impression a few seasons ago that they didn't want to have the GL depth for QB to work like this to prevent a team from doing what you are doing.

It is the sole reason I cut the HoF leading RQB on D'Hara like 3 seasons ago.


That's the thing they don't "allow" it. If we use a rushing qb we take a hit to our passing and when we use the pass guy we take a hit to our running. If they allowed us to swap them for certain plays I could understand your concern, but they don't. We can change from game to game but that's it. We flubbed with our playbook and depth chart coordination and that's on us.
 
Aeir
offline
Link
 
They kind of allow it. Use your passing QB in the default depth chart, then the running QB in the GL formation. Works just fine
 
HayRow
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jjet5552007
That's the thing they don't "allow" it. If we use a rushing qb we take a hit to our passing and when we use the pass guy we take a hit to our running. If they allowed us to swap them for certain plays I could understand your concern, but they don't. We can change from game to game but that's it. We flubbed with our playbook and depth chart coordination and that's on us.


Originally posted by Aeir
They kind of allow it. Use your passing QB in the default depth chart, then the running QB in the GL formation. Works just fine


This. This is what they weren't allowing in the beginning seasons. Even if you had a RQB only in the GL formations he would play in passing situations.
 
DeeVee8
Bucc'd Up
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by HayRow
This. This is what they weren't allowing in the beginning seasons. Even if you had a RQB only in the GL formations he would play in passing situations.


Yup, I've been using rQBs the whole time and you couldn't control when they would be in for the first few seasons. I then tried the dual theat route to some success. Around Season ~5 I saw it working with Yorick's. It is practically no overlap now.
Edited by DeeVee8 on Nov 24, 2014 13:35:08
 
Galithor
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by HayRow
This. This is what they weren't allowing in the beginning seasons. Even if you had a RQB only in the GL formations he would play in passing situations.


Your mistake with D'Haran was intentionally dirtying the perfectly clean water. Never introduce impurities to that which was already pure
 
HayRow
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galithor
Your mistake with D'Haran was intentionally dirtying the perfectly clean water. Never introduce impurities to that which was already pure


hahaha. You have hated the move so much!! At least I got us back to top 5, maybe top 3.

Originally posted by DeeVee8
Yup, I've been using rQBs the whole time and you couldn't control when they would be in for the first few seasons. I then tried the dual theat route to some success. Around Season ~5 I saw it working with Yorick's. It is practically no overlap now.


This is the truth and how it should of stayed.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.