Moon league is invite only chumps
Forum > Goal Line Blitz 2 > Ladder top 10 - 11/11
Fumblerooski
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
If another WL debacle is started I am out. I actually like seeing different opponents all season. If you guys want to circle jerk each other at the top thats great I guess but that is boring as fuck to me at this point and half the reason I stopped giving a shit about GLB1.
None of this makes sense, you'd still be playing each team one time in whatever league your team is in, and the ladder would still exist so you'd get all the games you have now.
But if in game tournaments are being planned that's just as good, everything TxSteve said would also solve this issue.
If another WL debacle is started I am out. I actually like seeing different opponents all season. If you guys want to circle jerk each other at the top thats great I guess but that is boring as fuck to me at this point and half the reason I stopped giving a shit about GLB1.
None of this makes sense, you'd still be playing each team one time in whatever league your team is in, and the ladder would still exist so you'd get all the games you have now.
But if in game tournaments are being planned that's just as good, everything TxSteve said would also solve this issue.
Stixx
offline
offline
Originally posted by Fumblerooski
None of this makes sense, you'd still be playing each team one time in whatever league your team is in, and the ladder would still exist so you'd get all the games you have now.
But if in game tournaments are being planned that's just as good, everything TxSteve said would also solve this issue.
One World League will never be a good idea. Not a chance that they will make that mistake again. The WL over on GLB1 turned out to be one of GLBs worst nightmares as it basically made a separate subsection of the game that only a few of the elite agents/networks were able to get into. Soon after the WL was created many agents turned to 0 cares for anything but the WL. You don't want to have anything like that happen here to cause new owners and agents to be turned off from the game because no one is trying to win until the last few seasons of their players builds.
None of this makes sense, you'd still be playing each team one time in whatever league your team is in, and the ladder would still exist so you'd get all the games you have now.
But if in game tournaments are being planned that's just as good, everything TxSteve said would also solve this issue.
One World League will never be a good idea. Not a chance that they will make that mistake again. The WL over on GLB1 turned out to be one of GLBs worst nightmares as it basically made a separate subsection of the game that only a few of the elite agents/networks were able to get into. Soon after the WL was created many agents turned to 0 cares for anything but the WL. You don't want to have anything like that happen here to cause new owners and agents to be turned off from the game because no one is trying to win until the last few seasons of their players builds.
Edited by Stixx on Nov 13, 2014 03:00:40
Stixx
offline
offline
Originally posted by Merik
world league? don't we already have mars league?
Think you were meaning to say Monroe League with 4 of the top 5 teams in the ladder in it. At one point it had the top 6 in the ladder all in one league
world league? don't we already have mars league?
Think you were meaning to say Monroe League with 4 of the top 5 teams in the ladder in it. At one point it had the top 6 in the ladder all in one league
Galithor
offline
offline
Originally posted by Stixx
Think you were meaning to say Monroe League with 4 of the top 5 teams in the ladder in it. At one point it had the top 6 in the ladder all in one league
it will be interesting to see who, other than Minnesota, can climb the ladder from season 3.
Think you were meaning to say Monroe League with 4 of the top 5 teams in the ladder in it. At one point it had the top 6 in the ladder all in one league
it will be interesting to see who, other than Minnesota, can climb the ladder from season 3.
Uncle Buck
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
If another WL debacle is started I am out. I actually like seeing different opponents all season. If you guys want to circle jerk each other at the top thats great I guess but that is boring as fuck to me at this point and half the reason I stopped giving a shit about GLB1.
Agreed 100%
If another WL debacle is started I am out. I actually like seeing different opponents all season. If you guys want to circle jerk each other at the top thats great I guess but that is boring as fuck to me at this point and half the reason I stopped giving a shit about GLB1.
Agreed 100%
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Fumblerooski
None of this makes sense, you'd still be playing each team one time in whatever league your team is in, and the ladder would still exist so you'd get all the games you have now.
But if in game tournaments are being planned that's just as good, everything TxSteve said would also solve this issue.
You would be playing all the wl teams and all that would matter is your league. May as well trash the rest of what makes glb2 any good.
None of this makes sense, you'd still be playing each team one time in whatever league your team is in, and the ladder would still exist so you'd get all the games you have now.
But if in game tournaments are being planned that's just as good, everything TxSteve said would also solve this issue.
You would be playing all the wl teams and all that would matter is your league. May as well trash the rest of what makes glb2 any good.
ihsaan
offline
offline
Originally posted by Galithor
it will be interesting to see who, other than Minnesota, can climb the ladder from season 3.
bullshit
it will be interesting to see who, other than Minnesota, can climb the ladder from season 3.
bullshit
I'm not sure how the world league talk got started. I don't think anyone is promoting that.
I simply said the current ladder formulas (within 20 / don't play more than once) seem a little broken in the top 10.
I simply said the current ladder formulas (within 20 / don't play more than once) seem a little broken in the top 10.
Parab00n
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
I'm not sure how the world league talk got started. I don't think anyone is promoting that.
I simply said the current ladder formulas (within 20 / don't play more than once) seem a little broken in the top 10.
These threads always turn to WL talk. I agree, the top 10 system isn't quite perfect yet. Hopefully this is on Bort and Corndogs radar.
I'm not sure how the world league talk got started. I don't think anyone is promoting that.
I simply said the current ladder formulas (within 20 / don't play more than once) seem a little broken in the top 10.
These threads always turn to WL talk. I agree, the top 10 system isn't quite perfect yet. Hopefully this is on Bort and Corndogs radar.
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by TxSteve
I'm not sure how the world league talk got started. I don't think anyone is promoting that.
I simply said the current ladder formulas (within 20 / don't play more than once) seem a little broken in the top 10.
Fumblerooski said he wanted a world league.
I'm not sure how the world league talk got started. I don't think anyone is promoting that.
I simply said the current ladder formulas (within 20 / don't play more than once) seem a little broken in the top 10.
Fumblerooski said he wanted a world league.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
