Warrior General Games

Originally posted by TxSteve
I watched every play. Laughing the whole time that you're bragging about a CB who gave up 17 catches in 1 game, but then what else would I expect from you

Cute coming from the guy who's only real success stunners ( which ground assualt is doing better btw with 3 more wins compared to where you were at 9 games through sophmore). I mean honestly what do you really have outside of the stunners? And also i have had a top 10 finish in the hof at their tier at every position I have created outside of qb (not enough attempts to try to keep up with other passing qbs), a de (i have one focused on run stopping so hell never win it) and k (too random but blanda is making his way to top ten if he keeps this up). So i think I may know what im doing.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
Thats pretty bold. I could tell you mine but honestly they are all set at 5 and i run inside and outside and left and right out of every formation but 5wr. Looks like lester gets your speed wr, and lester has him beat in everything but speed however i doubt .04 seconds is gunna make or break the bank.

Not bold so much as transparent.

Playbook was the same for Rookie with the exception of WR Posts set at 1 (moved to 2 for Soph).

And my S* QB and S* WR had open builds all through Rookie as well.

So I was more pointing it out, rather than doing anything different.

35-6 so far being transparent.

Originally posted by Rob.
You are acting like this is real football. Go ahead and never change your gameplan and be proud of it. Good teams will beat you.

No it's just a real head to head competition. There are people that want to look for all the wrinkles to a game. Then there are those that have an identity.

I run my two 100% owner created teams so that:

1. They have an identity.

2. They are consistent. Run the same O every game; even every scrim. People pay real$ to play the game. My view is not to waste it. Just because I don't change my game plan doesn't mean I'm not trying to be a worthwhile competitor.

3. You can win while being transparent. You can win even when helping people understand the game and helping them get better. When you do win, it's more satisfying against a knowledgeable competitor than against someone who isn't.

4. Not all winning within the game has to be calculated in wins-losses. I play to have fun first. Winning is generally more fun, but it's really about competing heavily rather than winning specifically.

Finally, I wanted rivalries in the Ladder since they already exist in League. Ladder rivalries only get one head to head match per season now. There won't be anymore Harrisonburg-Salty situations.

LZ Boys and GA will hopefully have one now. These posting threads are much more fun than just watching a simmed game of Tecmo Bowl.

Xars hits it perfectly. You know im going to run every single game, the question is can you stop it. There is a reason the top teams are where they are, they dictate the game, they tell you that this is what we are going to do and we dare you to try and stop us.

I'll probably make a big tl;dr post sharing what I learned from Air Raid after its veteran run ends.

Originally posted by Xars
No it's just a real head to head competition. There are people that want to look for all the wrinkles to a game. Then there are those that have an identity.

I run my two 100% owner created teams so that:

1. They have an identity.

2. They are consistent. Run the same O every game; even every scrim. People pay real$ to play the game. My view is not to waste it. Just because I don't change my game plan doesn't mean I'm not trying to be a worthwhile competitor.

3. You can win while being transparent. You can win even when helping people understand the game and helping them get better. When you do win, it's more satisfying against a knowledgeable competitor than against someone who isn't.

4. Not all winning within the game has to be calculated in wins-losses. I play to have fun first. Winning is generally more fun, but it's really about competing heavily rather than winning specifically.

Finally, I wanted rivalries in the Ladder since they already exist in League. Ladder rivalries only get one head to head match per season now. There won't be anymore Harrisonburg-Salty situations.

LZ Boys and GA will hopefully have one now. These posting threads are much more fun than just watching a simmed game of Tecmo Bowl.







Ladder rivalries are not what they used to be, back when the top teams would play a lot. Hard to develop a rivalry when you are playing zero to one time per season. Other than that, yes it's your money, so play how you want.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
Xars hits it perfectly. You know im going to run every single game, the question is can you stop it. There is a reason the top teams are where they are, they dictate the game, they tell you that this is what we are going to do and we dare you to try and stop us.

Yes I can stop it. I just need to find your tendencies and if you never change your gameplan/tactics, that will be really easy. After that it will just come down to builds.

Originally posted by Xars
Well if it's what you want. He's 24 for 45 on pass targets. He may get that many targets in just this game.

Combine stat matchup: Belgarion vs. Request Denied

60 yard shuttle: 14.11 vs. 13.92
20 yard shuttle: 5.25 vs. 5.14
Three Cone Drill: 7.83 vs. 7.69
Broad Jump: 93 vs 93
Vertical Jump: 22.5 vs 22.5
Bench Press: 16 reps vs 17 reps
40 yd Dash: 5.5 vs 5.46

Good luck.



Guess we have a rivalry.

Originally posted by Xars
Guess we have a rivalry.



Request will take care of Belgarion soon enough. The realities of the tier afford you some breathing room before I go spike coverage skills.