Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Sardonik00
Bhall, didn't another of your teams lose to us today?

Meh fun time is just a home for people with players. Their oline builds are worse for that plan than lost lounges.

Originally posted by Sardonik00
Bhall, didn't another of your teams lose to us today?

And every other time we've played this season...

Originally posted by bhall43
Meh fun time is just a home for people with players. Their oline builds are worse for that plan than lost lounges.

So it's sort of like a GLB2 charity?

Originally posted by IotB
Our argument has been pretty consistent actually.

#1. It's bad to make a change like this mid season.
#2. It's bad to make a change like this on game day.
#3. It's bad to make a change like this that isn't tested with community feedback.
#4. It's bad to make a change like this that doesn't address the problem.
#5. You could've banned GL QB Rollout Strong, GL HB Sweep and GL HB Slam and Yorick would not be as dismayed with that fix as we are with the one you made.
#6. Applying multiple changes all at once without testing and integration is bad.
#7. Screwing over paying "beta" customers is bad for business.

I think that about covers our points. Care to actually counter?

Corndog has to wait until ParaB00n responds for him.

Originally posted by Sardonik00
So it's sort of like a GLB2 charity?


Pretty much. I've already retired several players in order to accommodate people needing a team. Was better than that team sitting there as a CPU.

Originally posted by IotB
Our argument has been pretty consistent actually.

#1. It's bad to make a change like this mid season.
#2. It's bad to make a change like this on game day.
#3. It's bad to make a change like this that isn't tested with community feedback.
#4. It's bad to make a change like this that doesn't address the problem.
#5. You could've banned GL QB Rollout Strong, GL HB Sweep and GL HB Slam and Yorick would not be as dismayed with that fix as we are with the one you made.
#6. Applying multiple changes all at once without testing and integration is bad.
#7. Screwing over paying "beta" customers is bad for business.

I think that about covers our points. Care to actually counter?

BTW, #7 is the worst of them.

You took our money. We built a team to play by the rules as they were. You changed the rules in a way that completely broke our team and offered us nothing in return nor any way for us to start playing by the new rules.

So, for the rest of the season, I'm going to do my best with an obviously gimped team because I'm not going to wreck the league we're in by going inactive. But after that, I am done.

Originally posted by Xavori
And every other time we've played this season...

Is this where I make the xavori claim that passing is fine because my teams all lose?

Originally posted by Xavori


So, for the rest of the season, I'm going to do my best with an obviously gimped team because I'm not going to wreck the league we're in by going inactive. But after that, I am done.

Demonstrating Corndog's flawed mechanics is a side benefit, no?

Originally posted by bhall43
Pretty much. I've already retired several players in order to accommodate people needing a team. Was better than that team sitting there as a CPU.

Did you ask one of your players to try and run it? Maybe they have more time to spend game planning for it?

Originally posted by Sardonik00
Did you ask one of your players to try and run it? Maybe they have more time to spend game planning for it?



Nobody has expressed any interest. But if there is someone out there wanting to try some stuff out I'm certainly open to the idea.

Originally posted by Sardonik00
Demonstrating Corndog's flawed mechanics is a side benefit, no?



Actually, the tears of the team we beat today using the "fixed" QB Rollout would have been enough to sustain me.

The real irony is that what truly beat him was Corndog's changes that are letting me get away with running that stupid cow defense against pretty much everybody instead of just the very select few teams I thought it would work against when I was goofing with it in the offseason.

Originally posted by Xavori
Actually, the tears of the team we beat today using the "fixed" QB Rollout would have been enough to sustain me.

The real irony is that what truly beat him was Corndog's changes that are letting me get away with running that stupid cow defense against pretty much everybody instead of just the very select few teams I thought it would work against when I was goofing with it in the offseason.

Oh, so, we have the answer to this thread. Corndog's going to nerf defense next.

Originally posted by bhall43
Nobody has expressed any interest. But if there is someone out there wanting to try some stuff out I'm certainly open to the idea.

People should be able to buy higher ranked teams than Rookie.

Originally posted by IotB
Our argument has been pretty consistent actually.

#1. It's bad to make a change like this mid season.
#2. It's bad to make a change like this on game day.
#3. It's bad to make a change like this that isn't tested with community feedback.
#4. It's bad to make a change like this that doesn't address the problem.
#5. You could've banned GL QB Rollout Strong, GL HB Sweep and GL HB Slam and Yorick would not be as dismayed with that fix as we are with the one you made.
#6. Applying multiple changes all at once without testing and integration is bad.
#7. Screwing over paying "beta" customers is bad for business.

I think that about covers our points. Care to actually counter?

Remove GL formation outside of GL situations. Easiest fix available.

Best course of action would really be to return blocking to its previous level where nobody complained about it and it made sense, and make the goal line sets only callable within the opponents 20. It would really no longer decide games, since if you get within the opponents 20 you're probably going to be scoring anyway. Its pretty ridiculous how often o-line get revpancaked now, and how often I see my superstar lead blockers have a defender literally go right through them