Warrior General Games

Originally posted by peeti
Interesting...Sophemore Games and you say a QB that retires after Rookie played there? ok


Sophomore... Just as irrelevant as rookie.

Originally posted by peeti
And as I said in my Post...you ignore things like pure posession inside rush strategysI dont care anymore. Ceöebrate your HB while you will never accomplish anything aynmore


I know that. Your HB didn't do enough in your system. Not my fault. Put too much Power in there and he will win HB MVP.

Your lack of production because of your team scheme doesn't help you argument.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
I know that. Your HB didn't do enough in your system. Not my fault. Put too much Power in there and he will win HB MVP.

Your lack of production because of your team scheme doesn't help you argument.

You are right man Totally agree with u

Someone do a WR ranking. I am not sure how Hands is going to compete with a guy who can do shit like this all season...

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/58336/123314?player_id=8274

I don't care if you agree with me, the point of this thread is to bring about discussion.

But you are getting in your feelings because your HB wasn't picked instead of debating Why your HB fits the criteria better than any of the top 10.
So far all you have done are link posts from rookie or sophomore season, when this ranking was based off the Seasoned performances of the joes.

Until you can prove to me that Too Much Power, Mike Alstott, or any of these joes would not win HOF if they got 800 carries,
I'm not moved.

Originally posted by bhall43
Someone do a WR ranking. I am not sure how Hands is going to compete with a guy who can do shit like this all season...

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/58336/123314?player_id=8274

That was so sick.

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
Tre Mason has NEVER led his own league in yards or TDs and yet you have him #3. Hell, he doesn't even have a top 3 for rushing yards.

By the HoF:
Season 3: 52nd RB
Season 2: 49th RB
Season 1: 52nd RB

I'll just speak for the RB right behind him, to make this conversation fun by letting you have an argument of a > b.

Speedy by the HoF
Season 3: 1st
Season 2: 1st
Season 1: 3rd

OWNED!

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
I don't care if you agree with me, the point of this thread is to bring about discussion.

But you are getting in your feelings because your HB wasn't picked instead of debating Why your HB fits the criteria better than any of the top 10.
So far all you have done are link posts from rookie or sophomore season, when this ranking was based off the Seasoned performances of the joes.

Until you can prove to me that Too Much Power, Mike Alstott, or any of these joes would not win HOF if they got 800 carries,
I'm not moved.

Sometimes I wish I could see the world from the view of sth like you

Originally posted by RukusButkus
OWNED!

Owned how? This ranking was made off of the performances of players in seasoned.

You can't punish players because teams don't run 800 times. You evaluate based on what they have done, but you keep the integrity of the list by, of course, respecting sample size and adding criteria to zip off some of the 1 game wonders and CPU match heroes.

Originally posted by peeti
Sometimes I wish I could see the world from the view of sth like you


Is this you giving up? You can't think any more than this?

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Is this you giving up? You can't think any more than this?

Just one day...It would be awesome

Whatever makes you feel better buddy. sry ur HBs were not picked.

Originally posted by Jampy2.0
Sry if you think your HB is good, but he is not in this ranking.

pls no butthurt ITT everyone. You're all winners.

My HB had a better YPC than most HBs on the list. I should give him the ball more, or cut one of our other HBs to up his TD total

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/57412/130356?player_id=24942 BOOM
http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/player/24942

not saying he's top 10, just sayin he's def top 25

great back. definitely falls int the category of "should get the ball more"

edit to not feed the troll

Originally posted by peeti
No...Apperently Backs that are good enough to get enough first Downs to actually generate more rushes, are bad backs

had my HB run as much as yours, his stats would be better. just sayin

ib4edit