Zeta does look brutal to me though, you only have 2-3 teams that won't get to 5 wins. Can't see HOOD coasting to 10 wins, people will have to put in effort. I'm sure VDA wish they were in Alpha 
Edited by Golan on Aug 1, 2012 11:30:36
Forum > Pro Leagues > lolzeta
CerNeT
offline
offline
I accomplished what I wanted to do in that game. Limit big plays and shut down their TE who had gone for 17 catches and 400+ yards the previous game we played them when I had in our base AI that only single covers the TE. I'll just let my team and coordinating do the talking for me the next four seasons as I'm not going to waste my breath having debates with the human equivalent of a brick wall.
Originally posted by Golan
Zeta does look brutal to me though, you only have 2-3 teams that won't get to 5 wins. Can't see HOOD coasting to 10 wins, people will have to put in effort. I'm sure VDA wish they were in Alpha
meh. it doesnt matter our roster or conference each year, we always find the 9 wins once the schedule comes out.
Zeta does look brutal to me though, you only have 2-3 teams that won't get to 5 wins. Can't see HOOD coasting to 10 wins, people will have to put in effort. I'm sure VDA wish they were in Alpha
meh. it doesnt matter our roster or conference each year, we always find the 9 wins once the schedule comes out.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by CerNeT
I accomplished what I wanted to do in that game. Limit big plays and shut down their TE who had gone for 17 catches and 400+ yards the previous game we played them when I had in our base AI that only single covers the TE. I'll just let my team and coordinating do the talking for me the next four seasons as I'm not going to waste my breath having debates with the human equivalent of a brick wall.
I would suggest that in the WL you not triple-team any player. Single coverage with a faster player than your LOLB (like a cornerback or safety) and zone help over the top would have accomplished the same thing and not left you so exposed if their OC had better progressions.
I accomplished what I wanted to do in that game. Limit big plays and shut down their TE who had gone for 17 catches and 400+ yards the previous game we played them when I had in our base AI that only single covers the TE. I'll just let my team and coordinating do the talking for me the next four seasons as I'm not going to waste my breath having debates with the human equivalent of a brick wall.
I would suggest that in the WL you not triple-team any player. Single coverage with a faster player than your LOLB (like a cornerback or safety) and zone help over the top would have accomplished the same thing and not left you so exposed if their OC had better progressions.
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by CerNeT
I accomplished what I wanted to do in that game. Limit big plays and shut down their TE who had gone for 17 catches and 400+ yards the previous game we played them when I had in our base AI that only single covers the TE. I'll just let my team and coordinating do the talking for me the next four seasons as I'm not going to waste my breath having debates with the human equivalent of a brick wall.
I would suggest that in the WL you not triple-team any player. Single coverage with a faster player than your LOLB (like a cornerback or safety) and zone help over the top would have accomplished the same thing and not left you so exposed if their OC had better progressions.
lol i remember when he triple covered one of my WRs on a SI WR screen, lol it worked
Originally posted by CerNeT
I accomplished what I wanted to do in that game. Limit big plays and shut down their TE who had gone for 17 catches and 400+ yards the previous game we played them when I had in our base AI that only single covers the TE. I'll just let my team and coordinating do the talking for me the next four seasons as I'm not going to waste my breath having debates with the human equivalent of a brick wall.
I would suggest that in the WL you not triple-team any player. Single coverage with a faster player than your LOLB (like a cornerback or safety) and zone help over the top would have accomplished the same thing and not left you so exposed if their OC had better progressions.
lol i remember when he triple covered one of my WRs on a SI WR screen, lol it worked
CerNeT
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
I would suggest that in the WL you not triple-team any player. Single coverage with a faster player than your LOLB (like a cornerback or safety) and zone help over the top would have accomplished the same thing and not left you so exposed if their OC had better progressions.
I would suggest you actually win playoff games on a consistent basis before offering people advice on how to play a game you're only slightly above average at.
I would suggest that in the WL you not triple-team any player. Single coverage with a faster player than your LOLB (like a cornerback or safety) and zone help over the top would have accomplished the same thing and not left you so exposed if their OC had better progressions.
I would suggest you actually win playoff games on a consistent basis before offering people advice on how to play a game you're only slightly above average at.
Originally posted by jdbolick
I would suggest that in the WL you not triple-team any player. Single coverage with a faster player than your LOLB (like a cornerback or safety) and zone help over the top would have accomplished the same thing and not left you so exposed if their OC had better progressions.
Dis game wasnt in WL, Pro Coords arent near as smart, or at least Cer taught him a lesson, he better fix his progs, or from that game learned something.
I would suggest that in the WL you not triple-team any player. Single coverage with a faster player than your LOLB (like a cornerback or safety) and zone help over the top would have accomplished the same thing and not left you so exposed if their OC had better progressions.
Dis game wasnt in WL, Pro Coords arent near as smart, or at least Cer taught him a lesson, he better fix his progs, or from that game learned something.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by CerNeT
I would suggest you actually win playoff games on a consistent basis before offering people advice on how to play a game you're only slightly above average at.
It's good advice, dude. No need to get so hysterically defensive, but lol @ pretending that I'm not clearly awesome.
I would suggest you actually win playoff games on a consistent basis before offering people advice on how to play a game you're only slightly above average at.
It's good advice, dude. No need to get so hysterically defensive, but lol @ pretending that I'm not clearly awesome.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by .spider.
Dis game wasnt in WL, Pro Coords arent near as smart, or at least Cer taught him a lesson, he better fix his progs, or from that game learned something.
The thing is, triple-teaming wasn't even why he successfully defended those four plays in the playoffs. It was a needless, risky approach that shows he still has a lot to learn as a coordinator.
Dis game wasnt in WL, Pro Coords arent near as smart, or at least Cer taught him a lesson, he better fix his progs, or from that game learned something.
The thing is, triple-teaming wasn't even why he successfully defended those four plays in the playoffs. It was a needless, risky approach that shows he still has a lot to learn as a coordinator.
CerNeT
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
It's good advice, dude. No need to get so hysterically defensive, but lol @ pretending that I'm not clearly awesome.
Who's pretending? 
It's good advice, dude. No need to get so hysterically defensive, but lol @ pretending that I'm not clearly awesome.
Who's pretending?
Originally posted by jdbolick
The thing is, triple-teaming wasn't even why he successfully defended those four plays in the playoffs. It was a needless, risky approach that shows he still has a lot to learn as a coordinator.
I'm an awesome DC, i would have 5 teamed him
The thing is, triple-teaming wasn't even why he successfully defended those four plays in the playoffs. It was a needless, risky approach that shows he still has a lot to learn as a coordinator.
I'm an awesome DC, i would have 5 teamed him
Homage
offline
offline
Originally posted by .spider.
I'm an awesome DC, i would have 5 teamed him
Fuck that, all 8 on the TE.
I'm an awesome DC, i would have 5 teamed him
Fuck that, all 8 on the TE.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
