User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
herbdawg
offline
Link
 
I have a fist full of dolla's



hey
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Packers27
Originally posted by MileHighShoes
Originally posted by Packers27
Doesn't matter seric. The Steelers wont be able sack Rodgers. They cant catch him. Lets juts see how hard it is for GB to get Ben's ass on the ground.

I have a feeling you'll be eating your words.
Seriously, are you really predicting 0 sacks by the Steelers? Would you put money behind a statement like that?

Of course not. I'm not saying the Steelers will not get a sack on Rodgers. I'm saying that the Packers will get more. Trying to keep Rodgers from passing and running is not easy. No one has done it.


sure as hell looks like you're saying they will not get a sack on Rodgers.

Remember, Rodgers got sacked only 1 less time than Ben. So getting to him isn't as hard as you think.
 
herbdawg
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Seric
Originally posted by Packers27

Originally posted by MileHighShoes

Originally posted by Packers27

Doesn't matter seric. The Steelers wont be able sack Rodgers. They cant catch him. Lets juts see how hard it is for GB to get Ben's ass on the ground.

I have a feeling you'll be eating your words.
Seriously, are you really predicting 0 sacks by the Steelers? Would you put money behind a statement like that?

Of course not. I'm not saying the Steelers will not get a sack on Rodgers. I'm saying that the Packers will get more. Trying to keep Rodgers from passing and running is not easy. No one has done it.


sure as hell looks like you're saying they will not get a sack on Rodgers.

Remember, Rodgers got sacked only 1 less time than Ben. So getting to him isn't as hard as you think.


I think he is talking the pocket presence of ROgers ........I believe we (GB) will get to Ben but I have a hard time thinking we will get him to the turf
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by herbdawg
I think he is talking the pocket presence of ROgers ........I believe we (GB) will get to Ben but I have a hard time thinking we will get him to the turf


If that's what he meant, he needs to really think about the words he chooses to say it because what he said has nothing to do with pocket presence. His words read exactly the way he wrote them "The Steelers wont be able sack Rodgers. They cant catch him."
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
As for getting to Ben, yeah I am sure you will as well. It's getting him down that is the hard part. He's made some of the best tacklers in the game today miss.
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
This is interesting

http://blog.games.yahoo.com/blog/355-steelers-will-win-super-bowl-xlv-predicts-madden-11/

 
Link
 
Originally posted by Packers27


Let me break down your post for you. First off, I'm not bias.



Let me break it down for you:

1.) The word is BIASED, not bias. You can have bias, but you would call yourself biased or not biased. I think you've said this a couple times now and I just wanted to make sure you know the difference for future reference.

2.) All Steelers fans ARE biased towards the Steelers and all Packers fans are biased towards the Packers. You would think so at least. That is what it means to be a fan. If you thought your team was going to lose every week.....well, that is a shitty life as a fan of a team. Most of us are very optimistic that our team is going to win, even if it doesn't appear likely.

Carry on.

 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SteelersInsider

Let me break it down for you:

1.) The word is BIASED, not bias. You can have bias, but you would call yourself biased or not biased. I think you've said this a couple times now and I just wanted to make sure you know the difference for future reference.

2.) All Steelers fans ARE biased towards the Steelers and all Packers fans are biased towards the Packers. You would think so at least. That is what it means to be a fan. If you thought your team was going to lose every week.....well, that is a shitty life as a fan of a team. Most of us are very optimistic that our team is going to win, even if it doesn't appear likely.

Carry on.



LOL what he was trying to say is he's not talking as if there is no chance his team could lose but practically everything he has posted is as if his team is this unbeatable force and they're just going to roll through Pittsburgh as if Pittsburgh was a high school team. Fact of the matter is, this is not going to be an easy game for either team.
 
Packers27
offline
Link
 
Look! Its not rocket science. Yall are having problems with the interpretations of my words and rightfully so a couple of times so I'll say it like this. We did better agains tthe pass, and yall did better agianst the run. Overall, yall have the #1 D. We have the #5 D. Offensively, are we 9th and yall are 14th. We got our yards by passing the ball obviously. The Steelers have a balanced offense. We struggled at first but its obvious that we're the hottest team in the league. We recently found us a RB that can get us numbers. This makes us a nightmare for any team we face, including the Steelers. As of the Giants game, we have found a way to pass around any defense a team throws at us. The Bears gave us problems but as you could see, they gave up the big plays. Our defense is much better than people think because its overshadowed by Aaron Rodgers. The Super Bowl is gonna come down to field position and turnovers. You talk about how its not as hard as I think to sack Rodgers, but truthfully, it is hard. Not only that, but no team in this league will stop him from passing or running with the ball. Every defense in this league is gonna have to account for our passing game. If you blitz him then he will burn your ass. If the coverage is good then he's got the instincts to take off early and buy himself time. If you send a 3 man rush then you're wasting your time as well. Our coaches do a great job at gameplanning. Our defense will make Ben run for his life
 
herbdawg
offline
Link
 
LOL nothing like a good ole game to gain some enemy's
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Packers27
Look! Its not rocket science. Yall are having problems with the interpretations of my words and rightfully so a couple of times so I'll say it like this. We did better agains tthe pass, and yall did better agianst the run. Overall, yall have the #1 D. We have the #5 D. Offensively, are we 9th and yall are 14th. We got our yards by passing the ball obviously. The Steelers have a balanced offense. We struggled at first but its obvious that we're the hottest team in the league. We recently found us a RB that can get us numbers. This makes us a nightmare for any team we face, including the Steelers. As of the Giants game, we have found a way to pass around any defense a team throws at us. The Bears gave us problems but as you could see, they gave up the big plays. Our defense is much better than people think because its overshadowed by Aaron Rodgers. The Super Bowl is gonna come down to field position and turnovers. You talk about how its not as hard as I think to sack Rodgers, but truthfully, it is hard. Not only that, but no team in this league will stop him from passing or running with the ball. Every defense in this league is gonna have to account for our passing game. If you blitz him then he will burn your ass. If the coverage is good then he's got the instincts to take off early and buy himself time. If you send a 3 man rush then you're wasting your time as well. Our coaches do a great job at gameplanning. Our defense will make Ben run for his life


First of all Starks will be lucky to get 50 yards the entire game. We allowed 52.5 yards a game in the playoffs and 62.8 yards in the regular season to TEAMS not individual players. So please tell me, how Starks will be a nightmare for the Steelers.

Rodgers got sacked 31 times in the regular season (only 1 less than Ben), so it isn't THAT hard to sack him.

Fact of the matter is you don't want to admit that there is a chance that the Packers will lose and frankly regardless to what Vegas or whoever has them as the favorites say, it's a good chance they will lose. You keep talking like Rodgers is unsackable yet he got sacked 31 time in the regular season and 5 times in the playoffs (only 3 less than Ben). Rodgers is good but he's not as good as you're trying to make him out to be. The Steelers may give up yards through the air, yet we still win the games. Starks is good but he's not going to break through the Steelers defense when no running back in over 2 seasons has.

Playoffs Defensive stat ranking

Total Defense

Steelers 1st
Packers 3rd

Pass Defense

Steelers 2nd
Packers 7th

Run Defense

Steelers 1st
Packers 2nd

Green Bays defense is good, no one denies that. But the Steelers D is better.
 
Packers27
offline
Link
 
You contradict yourself alot don't you? If Rodgers has ben sacked 1 less time than Rothleisberger then how is it not hard to sack Rodgers, but hard to sack Ben? LOL!!! Now, you said something about your rush defense and our RB getting about 50 yards. Thats NOT the point. The rushing attempts is what matters. There is nothing I said about the Packers could lose this game. They very well could. The Steelers are good but we match us very very very well against them.

How is the Packers gonna beatt he Steelers? Well, if you are a true Steelers fan then you would know that the Steelers defense SUCKS when they are spread out. Troy will no longer be able to freelance like LeBeau likes to do with him. The Steelers will probably have success starting out but they will break eventually and when they do, we are very hard to predict. We pass out of running formations with PA and vice versa.

The Packers will win this game man. The Steelers are a great team but we match up much better against yall than we would've against the Jets.
 
Packers27
offline
Link
 
This is the Packers year. The Steelers will play us tough for two quarters but they won't be a match against us for 4.
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Packers27
You contradict yourself alot don't you? If Rodgers has ben sacked 1 less time than Rothleisberger then how is it not hard to sack Rodgers, but hard to sack Ben? LOL!!! Now, you said something about your rush defense and our RB getting about 50 yards. Thats NOT the point. The rushing attempts is what matters. There is nothing I said about the Packers could lose this game. They very well could. The Steelers are good but we match us very very very well against them.

How is the Packers gonna beatt he Steelers? Well, if you are a true Steelers fan then you would know that the Steelers defense SUCKS when they are spread out. Troy will no longer be able to freelance like LeBeau likes to do with him. The Steelers will probably have success starting out but they will break eventually and when they do, we are very hard to predict. We pass out of running formations with PA and vice versa.

The Packers will win this game man. The Steelers are a great team but we match up much better against yall than we would've against the Jets.


You truly are an idiot and homer aren't you? Rodgers got sacked 31 times, Ben got sacked 32 times. So please tell me how that tells you that Ben is easy to sack and Rodgers isn't? Maybe if you got your head out of your ass you'd understand simple logic. Rodgers is ranked 13th in the NFL with most sacks. Rothlisberger is tied at 11 in the same category, because of that there is no 12th place. So yeah, it's obviously not that hard to sack him.

PLEASE tell me in the following statement, WHICH YOU POSTED, where you said ANYTHING about attempts.

Originally posted by Packers27

We recently found us a RB that can get us numbers. This makes us a nightmare for any team we face, including the Steelers.


You truly are hilarious. So you think the attempts are the important thing not the yards. You are beyond special.

You don't have to say the Packers could lose or will not lose. It's your whole demeanor. It the way you're talking about the Packers.
 
Seric
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Packers27
This is the Packers year. The Steelers will play us tough for two quarters but they won't be a match against us for 4.




Let me guess, you're going by how we played the Jets to determine this.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.