Originally posted by SLZmonster
didn't Valhalla go 59-1 in WL?
fyp
didn't Valhalla go 59-1 in WL?
fyp
Forum > Pro Leagues > WL Gold Game
HEY YOU GUYS
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
Hard to judge how much Bort's extra boosts helped.
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
Hard to judge how much Bort's extra boosts helped.
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
I have no doubt that a lot of teams now would beat Valhalla's roster from back then, I'm just saying that it's hard to compare the teams respective to their eras given the advantage gained from Bort's extra boosts.
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
I have no doubt that a lot of teams now would beat Valhalla's roster from back then, I'm just saying that it's hard to compare the teams respective to their eras given the advantage gained from Bort's extra boosts.
dimmy finster
offline
offline
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
this is the correct.
3 in a row today > 3 in a row bck then.
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
this is the correct.
3 in a row today > 3 in a row bck then.
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by dimmy finster
3 in a row today > 3 in a row bck then.
On the surface, but the question I'm posing is whether or not HHWC would have won any titles at all if Bort hadn't suddenly decided to give the extra boosts.
3 in a row today > 3 in a row bck then.
On the surface, but the question I'm posing is whether or not HHWC would have won any titles at all if Bort hadn't suddenly decided to give the extra boosts.
HEY YOU GUYS
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
On the surface, but the question I'm posing is whether or not HHWC would have won any titles at all if Bort hadn't suddenly decided to give the extra boosts.
It wasn't suddenly deciding to give extra boosts, Idk about HHWC but when EQ still costed $$ me and dpride were planning on avoiding some dots even hitting 72 at certain positions as getting the EQ would not be feasible and the sps from those lvls were negligible compared to extra training in early seasons.
On the surface, but the question I'm posing is whether or not HHWC would have won any titles at all if Bort hadn't suddenly decided to give the extra boosts.
It wasn't suddenly deciding to give extra boosts, Idk about HHWC but when EQ still costed $$ me and dpride were planning on avoiding some dots even hitting 72 at certain positions as getting the EQ would not be feasible and the sps from those lvls were negligible compared to extra training in early seasons.
Wylker
offline
offline
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
It wasn't suddenly deciding to give extra boosts, Idk about HHWC but when EQ still costed $$ me and dpride were planning on avoiding some dots even hitting 72 at certain positions as getting the EQ would not be feasible and the sps from those lvls were negligible compared to extra training in early seasons.
dpride and I
It wasn't suddenly deciding to give extra boosts, Idk about HHWC but when EQ still costed $$ me and dpride were planning on avoiding some dots even hitting 72 at certain positions as getting the EQ would not be feasible and the sps from those lvls were negligible compared to extra training in early seasons.
dpride and I
How about we wait for the 3peat to actually happen. MooseJaw is legit and the championship game is a toss up.
HEY YOU GUYS
offline
offline
Originally posted by ufshowboat
How about we wait for the 3peat to actually happen. MooseJaw is legit and the championship game is a toss up.
toss up is humble,
HHWC would probably have at least a
-10.5 line
How about we wait for the 3peat to actually happen. MooseJaw is legit and the championship game is a toss up.
toss up is humble,
HHWC would probably have at least a
-10.5 line
Originally posted by dimmy finster
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
this is the correct.
3 in a row today > 3 in a row bck then.
how do you figure? there are considerably less people playing the game now than back then, aren't there?
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
this is the correct.
3 in a row today > 3 in a row bck then.
how do you figure? there are considerably less people playing the game now than back then, aren't there?
Ubasstards
offline
offline
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
toss up is humble,
HHWC would probably have at least a
-10.5 line
the teams played pretty close in a few scrims this season. I know its lolscrims with either no gameplanning or coords testing things. I think HHWC is a favorite but dunno about a 10.5.
I hope the score ends as close as our lolscrims have
toss up is humble,
HHWC would probably have at least a
-10.5 line
the teams played pretty close in a few scrims this season. I know its lolscrims with either no gameplanning or coords testing things. I think HHWC is a favorite but dunno about a 10.5.
I hope the score ends as close as our lolscrims have
GMathiasf
offline
offline
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
It wasn't suddenly deciding to give extra boosts, Idk about HHWC but when EQ still costed $$ me and dpride were planning on avoiding some dots even hitting 72 at certain positions as getting the EQ would not be feasible and the sps from those lvls were negligible compared to extra training in early seasons.
72? it barely made sense to pay for level 64 back before extended plateau. But that's not exactly the point. Allowing off-season dots to boost to 72 was NEVER a good decision by Bort as you have dots that got the benefits of SSBing without the punishment of not reaching 72. Allowing mid-season dots to boost to 72 made sense though for a few reasons.
It wasn't suddenly deciding to give extra boosts, Idk about HHWC but when EQ still costed $$ me and dpride were planning on avoiding some dots even hitting 72 at certain positions as getting the EQ would not be feasible and the sps from those lvls were negligible compared to extra training in early seasons.
72? it barely made sense to pay for level 64 back before extended plateau. But that's not exactly the point. Allowing off-season dots to boost to 72 was NEVER a good decision by Bort as you have dots that got the benefits of SSBing without the punishment of not reaching 72. Allowing mid-season dots to boost to 72 made sense though for a few reasons.
tautology
offline
offline
Pretty sure HHWC has a considerable edge, but anything can happen.
Good luck to both teams
Thrillk1
offline
offline
ValhallaOriginally posted by Gart888
Originally posted by dimmy finster
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
this is the correct.
3 in a row today > 3 in a row bck then.
how do you figure? there are considerably less people playing the game now than back then, aren't there?
Not knocking HHWC but Valhalla is the best all time right now. Their margin of victory and winning streak in the WL was just nasty! More folks were playing GLB back then as well. HHWC are beasts too no doubt.
Originally posted by dimmy finster
Originally posted by Phil Jackson
competition was lulzy when Valhalla was winning other than s13 when they didnt have 72 eq, Blaze was the only team who had a remote shot at beating them in s14/15.
this is the correct.
3 in a row today > 3 in a row bck then.
how do you figure? there are considerably less people playing the game now than back then, aren't there?
Not knocking HHWC but Valhalla is the best all time right now. Their margin of victory and winning streak in the WL was just nasty! More folks were playing GLB back then as well. HHWC are beasts too no doubt.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
