The difference there is your lower leveled players are the same level as our starters and our higher level players are only special team players.
Moo45
offline
offline
Originally posted by MadCow DTD
Originally posted by Porch
Originally posted by driftinggrifter
I'm not mad, though, I will say using lolevels as the excuse at first is rather asinine. Being in Pro leagues and all, you should be able to compete with teams that slightly outlevel you.
Meh, I'll get to play you guys next season anyways, so it really isn't no thing to me.
I disagree.
A well built and well coached season 4 team will beat a well built and well coached season 5 every time. Unless they meet in the decline. Now that season 5 team can beat plenty of season 4 teams that have not built players or are well coached but they have no shot at quality team with an extra season.
It should also be noted that your Australia Smurf team has the same average level as Sin City. If you really wanted to prove something you would pushing that game not the game where you had the clear edge.
Also given that you want to prove something and levels don't mean shit that to balance things out that your team take off some equipment. You know in the interest of fair play and all that....
i kinda agree, like no matter how good monte carlo was, they were never going to be the blue, we scrimmed every season, but they have some higher leveled players sprinkled in and we have lower leveled guys sprinkled in
Who cares whose team is better? Its a fucking video game. The fact of reality remains that Madcow is one of the biggest idiots I've met online or offline. So gratz to you madcow for latching onto a better team than most of OPL. It doesn't change the fact that you're a complete douche and you need a video game forum to try and cyber bully people to feed your ego.
I stated this before. Every person has a choice to make the world a better place. You make it worse by choice. I truly hope you get what you deserve in life.
It would be appreciated if you take your immature antics elsewhere. You're largely in a different league now. It's time to move on.
Originally posted by Porch
Originally posted by driftinggrifter
I'm not mad, though, I will say using lolevels as the excuse at first is rather asinine. Being in Pro leagues and all, you should be able to compete with teams that slightly outlevel you.
Meh, I'll get to play you guys next season anyways, so it really isn't no thing to me.
I disagree.
A well built and well coached season 4 team will beat a well built and well coached season 5 every time. Unless they meet in the decline. Now that season 5 team can beat plenty of season 4 teams that have not built players or are well coached but they have no shot at quality team with an extra season.
It should also be noted that your Australia Smurf team has the same average level as Sin City. If you really wanted to prove something you would pushing that game not the game where you had the clear edge.
Also given that you want to prove something and levels don't mean shit that to balance things out that your team take off some equipment. You know in the interest of fair play and all that....
i kinda agree, like no matter how good monte carlo was, they were never going to be the blue, we scrimmed every season, but they have some higher leveled players sprinkled in and we have lower leveled guys sprinkled in
Who cares whose team is better? Its a fucking video game. The fact of reality remains that Madcow is one of the biggest idiots I've met online or offline. So gratz to you madcow for latching onto a better team than most of OPL. It doesn't change the fact that you're a complete douche and you need a video game forum to try and cyber bully people to feed your ego.
I stated this before. Every person has a choice to make the world a better place. You make it worse by choice. I truly hope you get what you deserve in life.
It would be appreciated if you take your immature antics elsewhere. You're largely in a different league now. It's time to move on.
Porch
offline
offline
Originally posted by MadCow DTD
i kinda agree, like no matter how good monte carlo was, they were never going to be the blue, we scrimmed every season, but they have some higher leveled players sprinkled in and we have lower leveled guys sprinkled in
You still average 5 levels on Sin City and yes it is just like MCRG vs Blue. the Blue won every time by about 40 to 50 points. I think the last one was worse though and about 60 as Labatt started to merge with other teams and gain some higher level players.
I also noticed the the Blue beat the Australia Smurfs by about 50.
I am a bit curious as the window should be closing. The Blue have largely stop growing and won't improve much from now until the end of the season. Sin City and MCRG are still growing and early next year when those teams use the final 3 boosts would be the time to determine which team is better.
i kinda agree, like no matter how good monte carlo was, they were never going to be the blue, we scrimmed every season, but they have some higher leveled players sprinkled in and we have lower leveled guys sprinkled in
You still average 5 levels on Sin City and yes it is just like MCRG vs Blue. the Blue won every time by about 40 to 50 points. I think the last one was worse though and about 60 as Labatt started to merge with other teams and gain some higher level players.
I also noticed the the Blue beat the Australia Smurfs by about 50.
I am a bit curious as the window should be closing. The Blue have largely stop growing and won't improve much from now until the end of the season. Sin City and MCRG are still growing and early next year when those teams use the final 3 boosts would be the time to determine which team is better.
Bevo05
offline
offline
Originally posted by MadCow DTD
to bad your owner is a woman, he must have no confidence in you or your players, he is pretty much telling eveyone that he doesnt think his team is good enough.
LOL......You just don't get it
This scrimmage game would have happened a long time ago if you were not such a pestering idiot. I personally don't care about scrimmages nor do I care about the rankings. Just want to play some dot ball and have a little fun. And had you shown us or anybody else around here a little respect (instead of the childish na na na na my team is better than your team tactics) then you could have easily gotten more scrimmages.
But at the end of the day nobody cares about "your" team. First MCRG was the greatest team ever and they were going to destroy OPL. But wait you leave that team. Now the smurfs are the greatest team ever. Big flipping deal your players moved to a better team......yawn. Move on already. Go beat down the other teams in your league with your we are the greatest team rhetoric. Or any other league for that matter. It doesn't appear anyone else is interested here.
Note: If it was my decision i would have paid the flex and sent the ranked scrimmage just to get you to shut up about it. It would have been worth it for that reason alone. Plus I am sure there are some pretty good agents on that team. Just like MCRG doesn't appear to be such aholes after you left.
to bad your owner is a woman, he must have no confidence in you or your players, he is pretty much telling eveyone that he doesnt think his team is good enough.
LOL......You just don't get it
This scrimmage game would have happened a long time ago if you were not such a pestering idiot. I personally don't care about scrimmages nor do I care about the rankings. Just want to play some dot ball and have a little fun. And had you shown us or anybody else around here a little respect (instead of the childish na na na na my team is better than your team tactics) then you could have easily gotten more scrimmages.
But at the end of the day nobody cares about "your" team. First MCRG was the greatest team ever and they were going to destroy OPL. But wait you leave that team. Now the smurfs are the greatest team ever. Big flipping deal your players moved to a better team......yawn. Move on already. Go beat down the other teams in your league with your we are the greatest team rhetoric. Or any other league for that matter. It doesn't appear anyone else is interested here.
Note: If it was my decision i would have paid the flex and sent the ranked scrimmage just to get you to shut up about it. It would have been worth it for that reason alone. Plus I am sure there are some pretty good agents on that team. Just like MCRG doesn't appear to be such aholes after you left.
driftinggrifter
offline
offline
Originally posted by Porch
A well built and well coached season 4 team will beat a well built and well coached season 5 every time. Unless they meet in the decline. Now that season 5 team can beat plenty of season 4 teams that have not built players or are well coached but they have no shot at quality team with an extra season.
It should also be noted that your Australia Smurf team has the same average level as Sin City. If you really wanted to prove something you would pushing that game not the game where you had the clear edge.
Also given that you want to prove something and levels don't mean shit that to balance things out that your team take off some equipment. You know in the interest of fair play and all that....
If it matters any to you, I haven't upgraded my EQ in 2 seasons on my two players
Pro team vs Pro team but hey, you want to scrimmy A.S.S. then send one over, I'm sure the owner will accept any and all comers. As far as wanting to prove something, not really, the ranked scrimmies are pretty much the most competition no matter what league you are in. Is that to hard to understand? We had already played all the hard teams in SEAPro. And I only have one left to play for A.S.S. until playoffs come.
And no, I really don't agree with a well coached 4 team beating a well coached 5 team every time. To many factors from gameplanning all the way to the RNG. By saying that, you are saying there aren't any real upsets in AAA/Pro/WL. Where as I do believe that there are some. Some are due to gameplanning, others by RNG, but the point remains it won't happen every time.
A well built and well coached season 4 team will beat a well built and well coached season 5 every time. Unless they meet in the decline. Now that season 5 team can beat plenty of season 4 teams that have not built players or are well coached but they have no shot at quality team with an extra season.
It should also be noted that your Australia Smurf team has the same average level as Sin City. If you really wanted to prove something you would pushing that game not the game where you had the clear edge.
Also given that you want to prove something and levels don't mean shit that to balance things out that your team take off some equipment. You know in the interest of fair play and all that....
If it matters any to you, I haven't upgraded my EQ in 2 seasons on my two players
Pro team vs Pro team but hey, you want to scrimmy A.S.S. then send one over, I'm sure the owner will accept any and all comers. As far as wanting to prove something, not really, the ranked scrimmies are pretty much the most competition no matter what league you are in. Is that to hard to understand? We had already played all the hard teams in SEAPro. And I only have one left to play for A.S.S. until playoffs come.
And no, I really don't agree with a well coached 4 team beating a well coached 5 team every time. To many factors from gameplanning all the way to the RNG. By saying that, you are saying there aren't any real upsets in AAA/Pro/WL. Where as I do believe that there are some. Some are due to gameplanning, others by RNG, but the point remains it won't happen every time.
Unspoken
offline
offline
Drift I have a suggestion for you to Mod...
My suggestion is to boot Mad the fuck out of here.
My suggestion is to boot Mad the fuck out of here.
bighookworm
offline
offline
Originally posted by Porch
You still average 5 levels on Sin City and yes it is just like MCRG vs Blue. the Blue won every time by about 40 to 50 points. I think the last one was worse though and about 60 as Labatt started to merge with other teams and gain some higher level players.
I also noticed the the Blue beat the Australia Smurfs by about 50.
I am a bit curious as the window should be closing. The Blue have largely stop growing and won't improve much from now until the end of the season. Sin City and MCRG are still growing and early next year when those teams use the final 3 boosts would be the time to determine which team is better.
Porch, we keep spinning our wheels on this one. The point is, we will never know. Both teams lost dots for different reasons, which messes up things even more. We started as a S5 team, but we are not just that any more. We have a few dots that are older and a few that are younger. I don't know the exact #s, but I am sure that 25 -40% of our roster is not S5 dots and that will get bigger next season. I looked it up... 9 older than S5 and 16 younger than S5 (a few of them are just over level 50). I believe we have 8 new dots in their prime lined up to take over for the 9 that are leaving.
I hope that you can see that only 50% of our roster is in it's prime. I like our chances next year too.
You still average 5 levels on Sin City and yes it is just like MCRG vs Blue. the Blue won every time by about 40 to 50 points. I think the last one was worse though and about 60 as Labatt started to merge with other teams and gain some higher level players.
I also noticed the the Blue beat the Australia Smurfs by about 50.
I am a bit curious as the window should be closing. The Blue have largely stop growing and won't improve much from now until the end of the season. Sin City and MCRG are still growing and early next year when those teams use the final 3 boosts would be the time to determine which team is better.
Porch, we keep spinning our wheels on this one. The point is, we will never know. Both teams lost dots for different reasons, which messes up things even more. We started as a S5 team, but we are not just that any more. We have a few dots that are older and a few that are younger. I don't know the exact #s, but I am sure that 25 -40% of our roster is not S5 dots and that will get bigger next season. I looked it up... 9 older than S5 and 16 younger than S5 (a few of them are just over level 50). I believe we have 8 new dots in their prime lined up to take over for the 9 that are leaving.
I hope that you can see that only 50% of our roster is in it's prime. I like our chances next year too.
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by Unspoken
Drift I have a suggestion for you to Mod...
My suggestion is to boot Mad the fuck out of here.
lol this guy just doesnt get it
Drift I have a suggestion for you to Mod...
My suggestion is to boot Mad the fuck out of here.
lol this guy just doesnt get it
Porch
offline
offline
I am just using average level.
Labatt shows an average level of 69 which I base on Shaw as an average Season 5 day 0 guy. Also most teams founding fathers like Blaine, Blue, etc. tend to be right around the 69-70 level.
MCRG shows an average level of 66. That gap is closing as it used to typically been 5 levels.
On day 0 of next year MCRG hits the plateau and Labatt will start to fall off. At no other point will the two teams be as evenly matched as on that day.
On that day Labatt peaks and it starts to go downhill for the team. It is a fairly slow decline in that first year but it is still a decline. On the D alone you will have approximately 20 guys who will start to decline and on the offense about 14. Over 60% of the roster will be declining next year by my rough count. Even with 8 lined up you will have 26 guys who are going downhill. The problem will be there is undoubtedly a team like Sin City or MCRG in your league or coming into the league. A team who will be comprised primarily of guys in their peak next year and they will probably beat you. This is the best Labatt team that will exist without some major recruiting or merging.
As the decline is fairly slow you will be ok next year but you won't be as good as you were this year. At this point next season you probably will lose to Sin City and MCRG.
It's the natural order of things and the decline. Experiencing it now a one year plateau does suck but you should recognize this is more than likely your peak.
Labatt shows an average level of 69 which I base on Shaw as an average Season 5 day 0 guy. Also most teams founding fathers like Blaine, Blue, etc. tend to be right around the 69-70 level.
MCRG shows an average level of 66. That gap is closing as it used to typically been 5 levels.
On day 0 of next year MCRG hits the plateau and Labatt will start to fall off. At no other point will the two teams be as evenly matched as on that day.
On that day Labatt peaks and it starts to go downhill for the team. It is a fairly slow decline in that first year but it is still a decline. On the D alone you will have approximately 20 guys who will start to decline and on the offense about 14. Over 60% of the roster will be declining next year by my rough count. Even with 8 lined up you will have 26 guys who are going downhill. The problem will be there is undoubtedly a team like Sin City or MCRG in your league or coming into the league. A team who will be comprised primarily of guys in their peak next year and they will probably beat you. This is the best Labatt team that will exist without some major recruiting or merging.
As the decline is fairly slow you will be ok next year but you won't be as good as you were this year. At this point next season you probably will lose to Sin City and MCRG.
It's the natural order of things and the decline. Experiencing it now a one year plateau does suck but you should recognize this is more than likely your peak.
Porch
offline
offline
Originally posted by MadCow DTD
btw the blue will win next season too,
highly doubtful though it does somewhat depend on when you play next season. The longer it schedule a game the less likely it is that the Blue will win.
btw the blue will win next season too,
highly doubtful though it does somewhat depend on when you play next season. The longer it schedule a game the less likely it is that the Blue will win.
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by Porch
I am just using average level.
Labatt shows an average level of 69 which I base on Shaw as an average Season 5 day 0 guy. Also most teams founding fathers like Blaine, Blue, etc. tend to be right around the 69-70 level.
MCRG shows an average level of 66. That gap is closing as it used to typically been 5 levels.
On day 0 of next year MCRG hits the plateau and Labatt will start to fall off. At no other point will the two teams be as evenly matched as on that day.
On that day Labatt peaks and it starts to go downhill for the team. It is a fairly slow decline in that first year but it is still a decline. On the D alone you will have approximately 20 guys who will start to decline and on the offense about 14. Over 60% of the roster will be declining next year by my rough count. Even with 8 lined up you will have 26 guys who are going downhill. The problem will be there is undoubtedly a team like Sin City or MCRG in your league or coming into the league. A team who will be comprised primarily of guys in their peak next year and they will probably beat you. This is the best Labatt team that will exist without some major recruiting or merging.
As the decline is fairly slow you will be ok next year but you won't be as good as you were this year. At this point next season you probably will lose to Sin City and MCRG.
It's the natural order of things and the decline. Experiencing it now a one year plateau does suck but you should recognize this is more than likely your peak.
which is why im trying to get an ass load of scrimms, we won be any better than we are right now, and its a perfect time for the sim to favor our team, it just adds to the fact that we will never be any better than we are going into the playoffs, lol my players will be around for another 3 seasons
I am just using average level.
Labatt shows an average level of 69 which I base on Shaw as an average Season 5 day 0 guy. Also most teams founding fathers like Blaine, Blue, etc. tend to be right around the 69-70 level.
MCRG shows an average level of 66. That gap is closing as it used to typically been 5 levels.
On day 0 of next year MCRG hits the plateau and Labatt will start to fall off. At no other point will the two teams be as evenly matched as on that day.
On that day Labatt peaks and it starts to go downhill for the team. It is a fairly slow decline in that first year but it is still a decline. On the D alone you will have approximately 20 guys who will start to decline and on the offense about 14. Over 60% of the roster will be declining next year by my rough count. Even with 8 lined up you will have 26 guys who are going downhill. The problem will be there is undoubtedly a team like Sin City or MCRG in your league or coming into the league. A team who will be comprised primarily of guys in their peak next year and they will probably beat you. This is the best Labatt team that will exist without some major recruiting or merging.
As the decline is fairly slow you will be ok next year but you won't be as good as you were this year. At this point next season you probably will lose to Sin City and MCRG.
It's the natural order of things and the decline. Experiencing it now a one year plateau does suck but you should recognize this is more than likely your peak.
which is why im trying to get an ass load of scrimms, we won be any better than we are right now, and its a perfect time for the sim to favor our team, it just adds to the fact that we will never be any better than we are going into the playoffs, lol my players will be around for another 3 seasons
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by Porch
highly doubtful though it does somewhat depend on when you play next season. The longer it schedule a game the less likely it is that the Blue will win.
im convinced that our cooridnators are better than sin city, hands down, that enough will be enough for us to beat teams like sin city next season, very few teams have 4-5 people who run the offense and defense...
highly doubtful though it does somewhat depend on when you play next season. The longer it schedule a game the less likely it is that the Blue will win.
im convinced that our cooridnators are better than sin city, hands down, that enough will be enough for us to beat teams like sin city next season, very few teams have 4-5 people who run the offense and defense...
davizzle
offline
offline
Originally posted by This entire thread
whole bunch of whining and complaining goes in here
and it makes me lol. Also reminds me a of a quote "Arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded."
continue
whole bunch of whining and complaining goes in here
and it makes me lol. Also reminds me a of a quote "Arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded."
continue
bug03
offline
offline
Originally posted by davizzle
and it makes me lol. Also reminds me a of a quote "Arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded."
continue
Congratulations, you have just won the internetz! What are you going to do next?
and it makes me lol. Also reminds me a of a quote "Arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded."
continue
Congratulations, you have just won the internetz! What are you going to do next?
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
