User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > USA A Leagues > USA A #4 > Pre season rankings
Page:
 
pettymc
offline
Link
 
You assume? It's not an assumption. It was the clearly stated way that he ranked the teams. It's not completely accurate of course, but it's an easy way to do a quick measure.. How would you do it?


Yes this is based on starters average level I assume. Great. I think that's completely retarded way of doing things, but whatever.

 
Bears Rule
offline
Link
 
no use petty...just let the world play out...
 
Aggie_Outlaw
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by pettymc
You assume? It's not an assumption. It was the clearly stated way that he ranked the teams. It's not completely accurate of course, but it's an easy way to do a quick measure.. How would you do it?


Yes this is based on starters average level I assume. Great. I think that's completely retarded way of doing things, but whatever.



OMG. Did you read the rest of my post? I told you how I would do it. Am I going to spend the time? No.

Who really cares. Let's just play the games and see how it stacks out.

Last edited Jun 12, 2008 06:29:11
 
pettymc
offline
Link
 
1. You didn't address the retarded way you listed the assumption as a question when it was the clearly stated assumption by Bears Rule. Your lack of response is telling though.

2. Yes, I read your system of using custom equipment, which is time consuming, dumb, and inaccurate since we don't know what is upgraded. If we took a poll about which system is better, I imagine it would be over 95% for the way Bears Rule did it.

3. As for who really cares, you were the one that started the criticism. Now that we have all pointed out how flawed your comments are, you resort to "letting the games play themselves out".

I am with you on your last comment, however, let's play some games. I'm done critiquing you, but you deserved it! Good luck this season.

Originally posted by jaredgabro
Originally posted by pettymc

You assume? It's not an assumption. It was the clearly stated way that he ranked the teams. It's not completely accurate of course, but it's an easy way to do a quick measure.. How would you do it?


Yes this is based on starters average level I assume. Great. I think that's completely retarded way of doing things, but whatever.



OMG. Did you read the rest of my post? I told you how I would do it. Am I going to spend the time? No.

Who really cares. Let's just play the games and see how it stacks out.



Last edited Jun 12, 2008 12:31:12
 
treygreen13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by l4boMb4
fark boosted like crazy. I'm still debating whether or not to match it. I think we can still outlast their barrage.

I'm rolling the dice on this one, but at least they showed their cards first.


Thanks for hiding your starters, by the way. It made me take an additional 5 minutes to sort out your lineup.
 
Rod Long
offline
Link
 
OMG, he is purposely jabbing you a the sharp stick Grizz.
 
l4boMb4
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by treygreen13
Originally posted by l4boMb4

fark boosted like crazy. I'm still debating whether or not to match it. I think we can still outlast their barrage.

I'm rolling the dice on this one, but at least they showed their cards first.


Thanks for hiding your starters, by the way. It made me take an additional 5 minutes to sort out your lineup.


i did that this morning as a joke to one of my GM's. Not to throw you off my trail. If i wanted to do that i would have taken them off the depth chart.
 
Aggie_Outlaw
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by pettymc
1. You didn't address the retarded way you listed the assumption as a question when it was the clearly stated assumption by Bears Rule. Your lack of response is telling though.

2. Yes, I read your system of using custom equipment, which is time consuming, dumb, and inaccurate since we don't know what is upgraded. If we took a poll about which system is better, I imagine it would be over 95% for the way Bears Rule did it.

3. As for who really cares, you were the one that started the criticism. Now that we have all pointed out how flawed your comments are, you resort to "letting the games play themselves out".

I am with you on your last comment, however, let's play some games. I'm done critiquing you, but you deserved it! Good luck this season.

Originally posted by jaredgabro

Originally posted by pettymc


You assume? It's not an assumption. It was the clearly stated way that he ranked the teams. It's not completely accurate of course, but it's an easy way to do a quick measure.. How would you do it?


Yes this is based on starters average level I assume. Great. I think that's completely retarded way of doing things, but whatever.



OMG. Did you read the rest of my post? I told you how I would do it. Am I going to spend the time? No.

Who really cares. Let's just play the games and see how it stacks out.





You're a beating.
 
Bears Rule
offline
Link
 
Im not sure I understand the last 2 Sharks posts...but they both have sticks, jabbing, and beating in common...
 
Aggie_Outlaw
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bears Rule
Im not sure I understand the last 2 Sharks posts...but they both have sticks, jabbing, and beating in common...



Haha this thread has deteriorated to complete garbage.
 
pettymc
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jaredgabro
Originally posted by pettymc

1. You didn't address the retarded way you listed the assumption as a question when it was the clearly stated assumption by Bears Rule. Your lack of response is telling though.

2. Yes, I read your system of using custom equipment, which is time consuming, dumb, and inaccurate since we don't know what is upgraded. If we took a poll about which system is better, I imagine it would be over 95% for the way Bears Rule did it.

3. As for who really cares, you were the one that started the criticism. Now that we have all pointed out how flawed your comments are, you resort to "letting the games play themselves out".

I am with you on your last comment, however, let's play some games. I'm done critiquing you, but you deserved it! Good luck this season.

Originally posted by jaredgabro


Originally posted by pettymc



You assume? It's not an assumption. It was the clearly stated way that he ranked the teams. It's not completely accurate of course, but it's an easy way to do a quick measure.. How would you do it?


Yes this is based on starters average level I assume. Great. I think that's completely retarded way of doing things, but whatever.



OMG. Did you read the rest of my post? I told you how I would do it. Am I going to spend the time? No.

Who really cares. Let's just play the games and see how it stacks out.





You're a beating.


Gotcha!

 
treygreen13
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by l4boMb4
Originally posted by treygreen13

Originally posted by l4boMb4


fark boosted like crazy. I'm still debating whether or not to match it. I think we can still outlast their barrage.

I'm rolling the dice on this one, but at least they showed their cards first.


Thanks for hiding your starters, by the way. It made me take an additional 5 minutes to sort out your lineup.


i did that this morning as a joke to one of my GM's. Not to throw you off my trail. If i wanted to do that i would have taken them off the depth chart.


Ah, ok. People try it very frequently against us.
Just a tip, though, we don't go off the DC. We go off the Roster when we game plan. I was disappointed to see that your team is actually VERY good.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.