happy to see the formula snakes still up there 
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Lukin's Automated Ranking System (LARS)
Originally posted by DL24
You keep saying these ranking will get better...
I'm impressed At least someone is taking the time to do this
You keep saying these ranking will get better...
I'm impressed
At least someone is taking the time to do thislukin83
offline
offline
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Originally posted by DL24
You keep saying these ranking will get better...
I'm impressed At least someone is taking the time to do this
Drygerian came a long way from their original spot at #35 to where they are now at #3. There are still some head scratchers, but the rankings are definitely improving.
Originally posted by DL24
You keep saying these ranking will get better...
I'm impressed
At least someone is taking the time to do thisDrygerian came a long way from their original spot at #35 to where they are now at #3. There are still some head scratchers, but the rankings are definitely improving.
r87
offline
offline
holding the 16th ranked team to five field goals, and shutting down DMP completely...we fall 30 places.
love math based rankings lol
they are fun to look at and talk about though
love math based rankings lol
they are fun to look at and talk about though
lukin83
offline
offline
Originally posted by entropy
holding the 16th ranked team to five field goals, and shutting down DMP completely...we fall 30 places.
love math based rankings lol
they are fun to look at and talk about though
I am confused. You moved up 5 spots over the past week...
holding the 16th ranked team to five field goals, and shutting down DMP completely...we fall 30 places.
love math based rankings lol
they are fun to look at and talk about though
I am confused. You moved up 5 spots over the past week...
r87
offline
offline
maybe i'm retarded...not ruling it out
ahh ok so i just searched for our team name on page 3 and it brought back the old rankings instead of the ones farther down the list
retardedness solved
(still not sure about the 30 places thing...i've been in the sun all day)
ahh ok so i just searched for our team name on page 3 and it brought back the old rankings instead of the ones farther down the list
retardedness solved
(still not sure about the 30 places thing...i've been in the sun all day)
Edited by entropy on Jul 14, 2009 00:26:10
Edited by entropy on Jul 14, 2009 00:25:40
lukin83
offline
offline
Originally posted by entropy
maybe i'm retarded...not ruling it out
ahh ok so i just searched for our team name on page 3 and it brought back the old rankings instead of the ones farther down the list
retardedness solved
Mystery solved!
maybe i'm retarded...not ruling it out
ahh ok so i just searched for our team name on page 3 and it brought back the old rankings instead of the ones farther down the list
retardedness solved
Mystery solved!
rocklee711
offline
offline
Originally posted by lukin83
Originally posted by entropy
holding the 16th ranked team to five field goals, and shutting down DMP completely...we fall 30 places.
love math based rankings lol
they are fun to look at and talk about though
I am confused. You moved up 5 spots over the past week...
He got a little confused.... he's referring to the other ranking where we were in the top 50.
How do you compare the margin of victories though? A close win early in the year against what turns out to be a solid team should certainly count for something , or even a narrow loss shouldn't have you penalized as much. Or are teams just compared by how badly they beat or lose to common opponents?
We're not too far off, but we did beat fellow CPL East teams rated #63 and 68 too this past week And even the #34 ranked squad in a scrimmage (though I'm doubting that counts)
Originally posted by entropy
holding the 16th ranked team to five field goals, and shutting down DMP completely...we fall 30 places.
love math based rankings lol
they are fun to look at and talk about though
I am confused. You moved up 5 spots over the past week...
He got a little confused.... he's referring to the other ranking where we were in the top 50.
How do you compare the margin of victories though? A close win early in the year against what turns out to be a solid team should certainly count for something , or even a narrow loss shouldn't have you penalized as much. Or are teams just compared by how badly they beat or lose to common opponents?
We're not too far off, but we did beat fellow CPL East teams rated #63 and 68 too this past week And even the #34 ranked squad in a scrimmage (though I'm doubting that counts)
Edited by rocklee711 on Jul 14, 2009 00:51:17
Edited by rocklee711 on Jul 14, 2009 00:49:22
lukin83
offline
offline
Originally posted by rocklee711
Originally posted by lukin83
Originally posted by entropy
holding the 16th ranked team to five field goals, and shutting down DMP completely...we fall 30 places.
love math based rankings lol
they are fun to look at and talk about though
I am confused. You moved up 5 spots over the past week...
He got a little confused.... he's referring to the other ranking where we were in the top 50.
How do you compare the margin of victories though? A close win early in the year against what turns out to be a solid team should certainly count for something , or even a narrow loss shouldn't have you penalized as much. Or are teams just compared by how badly they beat or lose to common opponents?
We're not too far off, but we did beat fellow CPL East teams rated #63 and 68 too this past week And even the #34 ranked squad in a scrimmage (though I'm doubting that counts)
Every game has an expected margin of victory: essentially a spread. If the favored team does not cover the spread (narrow victory), the underdog will get bumped up and the favorite will get bumped down.
Originally posted by lukin83
Originally posted by entropy
holding the 16th ranked team to five field goals, and shutting down DMP completely...we fall 30 places.
love math based rankings lol
they are fun to look at and talk about though
I am confused. You moved up 5 spots over the past week...
He got a little confused.... he's referring to the other ranking where we were in the top 50.
How do you compare the margin of victories though? A close win early in the year against what turns out to be a solid team should certainly count for something , or even a narrow loss shouldn't have you penalized as much. Or are teams just compared by how badly they beat or lose to common opponents?
We're not too far off, but we did beat fellow CPL East teams rated #63 and 68 too this past week And even the #34 ranked squad in a scrimmage (though I'm doubting that counts)
Every game has an expected margin of victory: essentially a spread. If the favored team does not cover the spread (narrow victory), the underdog will get bumped up and the favorite will get bumped down.
Zumbo
offline
offline
Lukin, what are your means by which you do this. Is it some greasemonkey script that you made, or a complicated Excel Sheet that takes you 20 hours to do?
lukin83
offline
offline
Originally posted by @pp1e
Lukin, what are your means by which you do this. Is it some greasemonkey script that you made, or a complicated Excel Sheet that takes you 20 hours to do?
Complicated Excel sheet. It takes a ton of time to input all of the teams and schedules at the beginning of the season, but not too much time to update with scores and tournament games.
Lukin, what are your means by which you do this. Is it some greasemonkey script that you made, or a complicated Excel Sheet that takes you 20 hours to do?
Complicated Excel sheet. It takes a ton of time to input all of the teams and schedules at the beginning of the season, but not too much time to update with scores and tournament games.
turnit643
offline
offline
Originally posted by lukin83
Originally posted by @pp1e
Lukin, what are your means by which you do this. Is it some greasemonkey script that you made, or a complicated Excel Sheet that takes you 20 hours to do?
Complicated Excel sheet. It takes a ton of time to input all of the teams and schedules at the beginning of the season, but not too much time to update with scores and tournament games.
Kind of disappointing. All this time I was picturing the process as more of a pencil, paper, and an abacus thing.
Originally posted by @pp1e
Lukin, what are your means by which you do this. Is it some greasemonkey script that you made, or a complicated Excel Sheet that takes you 20 hours to do?
Complicated Excel sheet. It takes a ton of time to input all of the teams and schedules at the beginning of the season, but not too much time to update with scores and tournament games.
Kind of disappointing. All this time I was picturing the process as more of a pencil, paper, and an abacus thing.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
