Originally posted by Plankton
26 - 1
Mad props to Honolulu for taking this thread to heart.
I get it now.
26 - 1
Mad props to Honolulu for taking this thread to heart.
I get it now.
Forum > Oceania AA Leagues > Oceania AA #4 > ATTENTION! 911! IMPORTANT! --------------------------- PLAYOFF TEAMS EYES ONLY!
saltman241
offline
offline
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by Plankton
26 - 1
Mad props to Honolulu for taking this thread to heart.
I get it now.
Well I can't figure it out? Enlighten me?
Originally posted by Plankton
26 - 1
Mad props to Honolulu for taking this thread to heart.
I get it now.
Well I can't figure it out? Enlighten me?
cosmoxl
offline
offline
Originally posted by saltman241
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by Plankton
26 - 1
Mad props to Honolulu for taking this thread to heart.
I get it now.
Well I can't figure it out? Enlighten me?
you're already enlightened as I see you converted to Islam.
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by Plankton
26 - 1
Mad props to Honolulu for taking this thread to heart.
I get it now.
Well I can't figure it out? Enlighten me?
you're already enlightened as I see you converted to Islam.
saltman241
offline
offline
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by saltman241
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by Plankton
26 - 1
Mad props to Honolulu for taking this thread to heart.
I get it now.
Well I can't figure it out? Enlighten me?
you're already enlightened as I see you converted to Islam.
Seriously come on. You that sore of a loser?
Originally posted by saltman241
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by Plankton
26 - 1
Mad props to Honolulu for taking this thread to heart.
I get it now.
Well I can't figure it out? Enlighten me?
you're already enlightened as I see you converted to Islam.
Seriously come on. You that sore of a loser?
cosmoxl
offline
offline
Originally posted by saltman241
A completely unfounded and ridiculous claim by an obviously very sore loser.
the only sore people here is y'all, starting up threads all over GLB about it. if you gripe as much as you have been, you're gonna get some close looks at your own play calling.
be the first to eliminate it from your playbook. in other words, put your money where your mouth is.
A completely unfounded and ridiculous claim by an obviously very sore loser.
the only sore people here is y'all, starting up threads all over GLB about it. if you gripe as much as you have been, you're gonna get some close looks at your own play calling.
be the first to eliminate it from your playbook. in other words, put your money where your mouth is.
saltman241
offline
offline
We haven't changed a thing about our offense from game one. You obviously have NO clue what you talking about. Calling a play in a normal football fashion is one thing. Calling the same play downs 1-4 all the way down the field is a WHOLE different thing.
cosmoxl
offline
offline
Originally posted by saltman241
We haven't changed a thing about our offense from game one. You obviously have NO clue what you talking about. Calling a play in a normal football fashion is one thing. Calling the same play downs 1-4 all the way down the field is a WHOLE different thing.
look, I wouldn't get after you guys unless I liked you.
The 26-1 was the number of strong I slam runs that Plankton counted, if I understood him correctly. That's 26 of 49 rushes you had. Over half are the play you guys are upset about. I can believe you haven't changed anything. I know why you run that play, why anybody runs that play - it works. But, when you gripe as much as you have been doing it seems a little odd to use that play so much.
We haven't changed a thing about our offense from game one. You obviously have NO clue what you talking about. Calling a play in a normal football fashion is one thing. Calling the same play downs 1-4 all the way down the field is a WHOLE different thing.
look, I wouldn't get after you guys unless I liked you.
The 26-1 was the number of strong I slam runs that Plankton counted, if I understood him correctly. That's 26 of 49 rushes you had. Over half are the play you guys are upset about. I can believe you haven't changed anything. I know why you run that play, why anybody runs that play - it works. But, when you gripe as much as you have been doing it seems a little odd to use that play so much.
masskillz
offline
offline
No excuses we got beat. Just glad I'm not the only one that noticed what seemed to be a little more than calling a play in the fashion of the game..
Last edited Apr 2, 2009 14:46:32
saltman241
offline
offline
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by saltman241
We haven't changed a thing about our offense from game one. You obviously have NO clue what you talking about. Calling a play in a normal football fashion is one thing. Calling the same play downs 1-4 all the way down the field is a WHOLE different thing.
look, I wouldn't get after you guys unless I liked you.
The 26-1 was the number of strong I slam runs that Plankton counted, if I understood him correctly. That's 26 of 49 rushes you had. Over half are the play you guys are upset about. I can believe you haven't changed anything. I know why you run that play, why anybody runs that play - it works. But, when you gripe as much as you have been doing it seems a little odd to use that play so much.
You guys are too much! Yeah that's the reason why we won your right. Lets forget that we threw the ball 30 times. Or the other 23 run plays. Surely it had to be those other 21 plays that won it for them.
Originally posted by saltman241
We haven't changed a thing about our offense from game one. You obviously have NO clue what you talking about. Calling a play in a normal football fashion is one thing. Calling the same play downs 1-4 all the way down the field is a WHOLE different thing.
look, I wouldn't get after you guys unless I liked you.
The 26-1 was the number of strong I slam runs that Plankton counted, if I understood him correctly. That's 26 of 49 rushes you had. Over half are the play you guys are upset about. I can believe you haven't changed anything. I know why you run that play, why anybody runs that play - it works. But, when you gripe as much as you have been doing it seems a little odd to use that play so much.
You guys are too much! Yeah that's the reason why we won your right. Lets forget that we threw the ball 30 times. Or the other 23 run plays. Surely it had to be those other 21 plays that won it for them.
cosmoxl
offline
offline
Originally posted by saltman241
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by saltman241
We haven't changed a thing about our offense from game one. You obviously have NO clue what you talking about. Calling a play in a normal football fashion is one thing. Calling the same play downs 1-4 all the way down the field is a WHOLE different thing.
look, I wouldn't get after you guys unless I liked you.
The 26-1 was the number of strong I slam runs that Plankton counted, if I understood him correctly. That's 26 of 49 rushes you had. Over half are the play you guys are upset about. I can believe you haven't changed anything. I know why you run that play, why anybody runs that play - it works. But, when you gripe as much as you have been doing it seems a little odd to use that play so much.
You guys are too much! Yeah that's the reason why we won your right. Lets forget that we threw the ball 30 times. Or the other 23 run plays. Surely it had to be those other 21 plays that won it for them.
I never said that's why you won. I never even thought it. The point is something else, but maybe you just won't get it.
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by saltman241
We haven't changed a thing about our offense from game one. You obviously have NO clue what you talking about. Calling a play in a normal football fashion is one thing. Calling the same play downs 1-4 all the way down the field is a WHOLE different thing.
look, I wouldn't get after you guys unless I liked you.
The 26-1 was the number of strong I slam runs that Plankton counted, if I understood him correctly. That's 26 of 49 rushes you had. Over half are the play you guys are upset about. I can believe you haven't changed anything. I know why you run that play, why anybody runs that play - it works. But, when you gripe as much as you have been doing it seems a little odd to use that play so much.
You guys are too much! Yeah that's the reason why we won your right. Lets forget that we threw the ball 30 times. Or the other 23 run plays. Surely it had to be those other 21 plays that won it for them.
I never said that's why you won. I never even thought it. The point is something else, but maybe you just won't get it.
saltman241
offline
offline
My point and the point of my thread in the main forum is that "the play" can be exploited. Thus it should be removed so that people who would exploit it aren't allowed to do so. Exploiting it would be running it downs 1-4 for the whole game. Not using it as part of your normal offensive game plan.
cosmoxl
offline
offline
Originally posted by saltman241
My point and the point of my thread in the main forum is that "the play" can be exploited. Thus it should be removed so that people who would exploit it aren't allowed to do so. Exploiting it would be running it downs 1-4 for the whole game. Not using it as part of your normal offensive game plan.
I know what exploiting it is and I know you don't do it.
now, do you really not see what my point is in this whole matter?
My point and the point of my thread in the main forum is that "the play" can be exploited. Thus it should be removed so that people who would exploit it aren't allowed to do so. Exploiting it would be running it downs 1-4 for the whole game. Not using it as part of your normal offensive game plan.
I know what exploiting it is and I know you don't do it.
now, do you really not see what my point is in this whole matter?
POO NANNIE
offline
offline
Originally posted by cosmoxl
Originally posted by saltman241
My point and the point of my thread in the main forum is that "the play" can be exploited. Thus it should be removed so that people who would exploit it aren't allowed to do so. Exploiting it would be running it downs 1-4 for the whole game. Not using it as part of your normal offensive game plan.
I know what exploiting it is and I know you don't do it.
now, do you really not see what my point is in this whole matter?
I see where you would have some animosity. Obviously something would be said regardless. I do not make gameplans for the Staleys, however with that being said, Naka is a straight forward guy and he would not stoop that low. Its in everybodies playbook. Am I missing something here? Did our defense not play a solid game? Did our kicker not hit 2 50 plus field goals and 3 field goals with under 1.5 yards to go for the 1st down?
There is nothing to defend here. You need to either send kudos or call an elephant an elephant.
Originally posted by saltman241
My point and the point of my thread in the main forum is that "the play" can be exploited. Thus it should be removed so that people who would exploit it aren't allowed to do so. Exploiting it would be running it downs 1-4 for the whole game. Not using it as part of your normal offensive game plan.
I know what exploiting it is and I know you don't do it.
now, do you really not see what my point is in this whole matter?
I see where you would have some animosity. Obviously something would be said regardless. I do not make gameplans for the Staleys, however with that being said, Naka is a straight forward guy and he would not stoop that low. Its in everybodies playbook. Am I missing something here? Did our defense not play a solid game? Did our kicker not hit 2 50 plus field goals and 3 field goals with under 1.5 yards to go for the 1st down?
There is nothing to defend here. You need to either send kudos or call an elephant an elephant.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
