Originally posted by RobertRJS
Originally posted by bubbajwp
I'll simplify it
We usually use a run heavy offense = Limas not good stats
We switch up our ai to a pass heavy offense = Limas has good stats
The games I have already provided in this thread are the evidence. Easy enough
So why should LLS get the trophy if you only stat-pad him vs CPU teams?
LLS: 9 games vs non-CPU
36 rec, 506 yards. Extrapolate that for a 13 game season so far...
52 rec, 731 yards.
Why should LLS get recognized for his play against CPU teams? Those numbers are not bad, but they're not anything to write home about.
The issue really isn't whether LLS is the better receiver, it's that he's stealing a trophy from a far more worthy one...or two....or three.
If that's the case then why should we even consider the receivers for your team? If you pass all the time then it's not really fair to the receivers on teams that don't pass all the time...see how far stupid logic can go if you push it? Should we only consider players that don't play gutted teams? Only receivers that don't play on super pass heavy teams?
He's a very good receiver and we use him to win when the gameplan calls for it...it's as simple as that. No one is saying that you should view his games against gutted teams as amazing but he does perform when we have a pass-centered gameplan and that's what a good receiver does. You can't expect him to have great stats all the time when we are more of a run-focused team than pass.
Originally posted by bubbajwp
I'll simplify it
We usually use a run heavy offense = Limas not good stats
We switch up our ai to a pass heavy offense = Limas has good stats
The games I have already provided in this thread are the evidence. Easy enough
So why should LLS get the trophy if you only stat-pad him vs CPU teams?
LLS: 9 games vs non-CPU
36 rec, 506 yards. Extrapolate that for a 13 game season so far...
52 rec, 731 yards.
Why should LLS get recognized for his play against CPU teams? Those numbers are not bad, but they're not anything to write home about.
The issue really isn't whether LLS is the better receiver, it's that he's stealing a trophy from a far more worthy one...or two....or three.
If that's the case then why should we even consider the receivers for your team? If you pass all the time then it's not really fair to the receivers on teams that don't pass all the time...see how far stupid logic can go if you push it? Should we only consider players that don't play gutted teams? Only receivers that don't play on super pass heavy teams?
He's a very good receiver and we use him to win when the gameplan calls for it...it's as simple as that. No one is saying that you should view his games against gutted teams as amazing but he does perform when we have a pass-centered gameplan and that's what a good receiver does. You can't expect him to have great stats all the time when we are more of a run-focused team than pass.






























