Originally posted by Peacesells
Originally posted by rsheehy
Originally posted by Peacesells
I'd also suggest going with 5 WR's instead of just 4.
the only thing im worried about going with 5 wr is all of them getting enough xp during games. the offense will not be able to move the ball thus not getting alot of plays. we can also us the TE that will be a pure receiving TE at wr5. i am open to any suggestions though, and if people think that 5 WR is the way to go im fine with that.
We did the same thing with another team I help run. We ended up with extra DE's and had to use them liberally on special teams to balance it out..but it can be done. The only reason I say 5 WR's is once the team is set you can really wear out a defense with 5 strong WR's. Not many teams are 5 deep on DB's. Just a suggestion.
there are now 5 wr spots for the team, we will just have to figure out a way to make sure they all get enough snaps.
Originally posted by rsheehy
Originally posted by Peacesells
I'd also suggest going with 5 WR's instead of just 4.
the only thing im worried about going with 5 wr is all of them getting enough xp during games. the offense will not be able to move the ball thus not getting alot of plays. we can also us the TE that will be a pure receiving TE at wr5. i am open to any suggestions though, and if people think that 5 WR is the way to go im fine with that.
We did the same thing with another team I help run. We ended up with extra DE's and had to use them liberally on special teams to balance it out..but it can be done. The only reason I say 5 WR's is once the team is set you can really wear out a defense with 5 strong WR's. Not many teams are 5 deep on DB's. Just a suggestion.
there are now 5 wr spots for the team, we will just have to figure out a way to make sure they all get enough snaps.