Warrior General Games

Originally posted by imlikeMacGyver
Originally posted by bosox162

Originally posted by imlikeMacGyver


And another thing if you look at my post comparing Rouse's numbers to Faarooq's I ackknowledged that we played two very bad teams. But very bad teams =/= CPU FBs playing QB.

So how do CPU FB's playing QB make Rouse's numbers better?

I'm referring to your long post of team stats that are worthless.

Them being worthless is your opinion and a wrong opinion at that. Everyone is going to play the same teams. Right now the stats I posted are all facts. It will probably change next week as we play a good team in Justice LEague

/eating popcorn

Originally posted by Zeke Woodson
/eating popcorn

Don't worry, Wyndex and I haven't forgotten about your team. As soon as we embarass Ryan Rouse we will move on to harassing you.

I can't believe this thread escalated into 4 pages. It was entertaining though. Good work with your fun facts imlikeMacGyver. I enjoyed reading that post.

Not to step in here but I’ve been inadvertently dragged in, but either we’re all very bored or something is wrong. It is just a game. I build my little guy and check up on him occasionally. He goes out and does his thing according to the AI which I didn’t code. There is certainly a difference between a good and a bad build, but I think we all know that what is a good build one year isn’t necessarily that great this year.

Look at this year with the issues created with Bort messing with DE, OT, and LB pathing, blitzing and blocking. Number of sacks, overall ratings, etc are just numbers which do not represent the complexity of interactions going on in a play. What is the point of arguing if one player is better than another, other than to stir the pot and bait a few reactions. I think Faarooq is putting up impressive numbers and we’ll see at the season’s end who gets what little tiny .jpgs on their player’s profile.

My point is that arguing things like Oh Noes being 6 levels under Faarooq or who has faced which teams or what crazy issues the sim has on a given day effective what numbers different positions will put up is pointless. In the end, I look forward to the Chups game against a great team (with a great name) on the 24th. Best of luck in the game to both sides, it’ll be interesting.

I give it a 6/10 for entertainment value.

Originally posted by bluemagus
Not to step in here but I’ve been inadvertently dragged in, but either we’re all very bored or something is wrong. It is just a game. I build my little guy and check up on him occasionally. He goes out and does his thing according to the AI which I didn’t code. There is certainly a difference between a good and a bad build, but I think we all know that what is a good build one year isn’t necessarily that great this year.

Look at this year with the issues created with Bort messing with DE, OT, and LB pathing, blitzing and blocking. Number of sacks, overall ratings, etc are just numbers which do not represent the complexity of interactions going on in a play. What is the point of arguing if one player is better than another, other than to stir the pot and bait a few reactions. I think Faarooq is putting up impressive numbers and we’ll see at the season’s end who gets what little tiny .jps on their player’s profile.

My point is that arguing things like Oh Noes being 6 levels under Faarooq or who has faced which teams or what crazy issues the sim has on a given day effective what numbers different positions will put up is pointless. In the end, I look forward to the Chups game against a great team (with a great name) on the 24th. Best of luck in the game to both sides, it’ll be interesting.


Ya, but see you don't get it.....if they didn't have this stupid stuff to "talk" about, what else would they use to gum up the game's server?

Originally posted by imlikeMacGyver
Originally posted by Zeke Woodson

/eating popcorn

Don't worry, Wyndex and I haven't forgotten about your team. As soon as we embarass Ryan Rouse we will move on to harassing you.

Go for it.

I care not.

Nitwit #1: I can hold my johnson longer than you
Nitwit #2: Ya, well I can play with my johnson longer than you
Nitwit #3: Well my johnson is at least 10 inches longer than yours

Nitwits #1,2, and 3 Combined: It's fun playing with ourselves, ain't it? Let's keep doing it.

Hi, i'm the nutsack leader!

In regards to the amount you have had in your mouth?

Oh, I see we've moved up to 3rd grade now?

Congrats.

Originally posted by bluemagus
Not to step in here but I’ve been inadvertently dragged in, but either we’re all very bored or something is wrong. It is just a game. I build my little guy and check up on him occasionally. He goes out and does his thing according to the AI which I didn’t code. There is certainly a difference between a good and a bad build, but I think we all know that what is a good build one year isn’t necessarily that great this year.

Look at this year with the issues created with Bort messing with DE, OT, and LB pathing, blitzing and blocking. Number of sacks, overall ratings, etc are just numbers which do not represent the complexity of interactions going on in a play. What is the point of arguing if one player is better than another, other than to stir the pot and bait a few reactions. I think Faarooq is putting up impressive numbers and we’ll see at the season’s end who gets what little tiny .jpgs on their player’s profile.

My point is that arguing things like Oh Noes being 6 levels under Faarooq or who has faced which teams or what crazy issues the sim has on a given day effective what numbers different positions will put up is pointless. In the end, I look forward to the Chups game against a great team (with a great name) on the 24th. Best of luck in the game to both sides, it’ll be interesting.


Did you just declare a race to the end of the season with the most sacks? Because that's how I read it.

Also as far as I see it, we're all just having fun. Barcelona's owner is my TEs QB, why would I make him mad? He already never throws the ball to me and making him mad would not make things better.