User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
You guys testing before rollover...



And maybe it is in effect but generally it never goes into effect till after so you guys could be applauding old code.


-4 i got must be new to glb because nothing gets actually put in until rollover. Which hasn't even happened yet.
 
_OSIRIS_
offline
Link
 
My head would explode trying to defend mirrored plays. Would the TE flip sides?
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
My head would explode trying to defend mirrored plays. Would the TE flip sides?


There is no TE? Its diamond bro. Nothing actually flips except the plays. You wouldn't defend it much if any differently.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Spastic_Cowboy
My Rookie team is passing around 50% in two scrims. We went 2/22 in a real game a few days ago. Seems pretty different to me.


My math isn't great, but you have thrown 50% or better against Portland Ronin (minus the games you went 0-1 and 0-0) in scrimmages since July 7th and suddenly you went 12 for 24 with all those SP's spent and the sim fixed for you? Looks pretty legit. We will just forget that scrimmages don't play by chemistry rules.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Myrik_Justiciar
DeeVee scrimmed me and passing looked pretty good:

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/game/343712 (Hell of a game)

Also, this was a hell of play at the end of the game:

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/343712/590157

Hopefully this is the fix we needed.


What exactly did you see change in this game from the Cunts REAL game you played today? Because I am not really seeing a big change myself. Pretty sure the changes didn't upload here.
 
_OSIRIS_
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
There is no TE? Its diamond bro. Nothing actually flips except the plays. You wouldn't defend it much if any differently.


If you're just talking diamond I am all for it. I was thinking every formation. Diamond could use a lot more new plays, maybe one would work.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
If you're just talking diamond I am all for it. I was thinking every formation. Diamond could use a lot more new plays, maybe one would work.


Originally posted by bhall43


That isn't true. I have actually been pretty vocal about taking the Diamond Formation and mirroring the running plays. As well as making FB off tackle or outside runs in the formation that is well, FB based. But hey, make up the shit you want because you wish to ignore a good suggestion.

It's a whatever.


Think I even mentioned it twice in the other guess what changes are coming thread but im too lazy to look.

But ya, Diamond is a mirror formation and there is so much unused potential to make it more of a formation a team could build around with 2 superstar FB's and what not. It is a shame we can't get that kind of potential because, LOL 2wr has 100 plays already man!
Edited by bhall43 on Jul 14, 2016 00:50:18
 
Team Nucleus
Draft Man
offline
Link
 
Glad to see the fixes will quiet a lot of whining
Edited by Team Nucleus on Jul 14, 2016 18:53:33
 
Xars
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43
You guys testing before rollover...



And maybe it is in effect but generally it never goes into effect till after so you guys could be applauding old code.


Originally posted by bhall43
-4 i got must be new to glb because nothing gets actually put in until rollover. Which hasn't even happened yet.


They made a post at one point that if the Changelog is posted, it's live. I think it happened when you weren't as active.
 
Duro
offline
Link
 
Well only seen a couple scrims but my superstar wr seems to have gone beast mode since changes. So something is going right.

edit: well maybe not all that different after looking through the prior scrims from the last couple days....
Edited by Duro on Jul 14, 2016 07:05:26
 
Link
 
Originally posted by bhall43


That isn't true. I have actually been pretty vocal about taking the Diamond Formation and mirroring the running plays. As well as making FB off tackle or outside runs in the formation that is well, FB based. But hey, make up the shit you want because you wish to ignore a good suggestion.

It's a whatever.


Yes to the diamond formation. Why would you make a new formation to feature the FB when you limit the # of FB plays???
 
Cuivienen
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Team Nucleus
Glad the to the fixes will quiet a lot of whining


This qualifies as whining.
 
Cuivienen
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Xars
They made a post at one point that if the Changelog is posted, it's live. I think it happened when you weren't as active.


Way to derail the bhall rage train.
 
bhall43
offline
Link
 
link or it didn't happen
 
Link
 
Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
My head would explode trying to defend mirrored plays. Would the TE flip sides?


No. That would be a formation change which hopefully will never happen or offenses would be unstoppable.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.