Warrior General Games

Originally posted by TxSteve
play of the year candidate in Vet?

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/218034/192980

5% Chem hit huh

Originally posted by Parab00n
Cruise Missle played 20 plays in the 4th QTR alone. Lester Hays was in the game until we scored the first time and he had to start returning kicks. After that, your sub settings of Sometimes(<70) kicked in and you had a fresh CB with 100 Energy ready to go.


http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/218038/165128 - Lester Hays starts the play with a Max of 71 Energy, finishes the play at 44. Probably has a Max of less than 70 now so new CB will be in the game until Lester has over 70 or until he drops below what ever Lesters new Max Energy is.

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/218038/165241 - This is the next play you see Lester, notice he has a Max of 70 which is only going to get lower with this KR. Lester will no longer even be considered for a play until his backup falls below him in Energy.

our st has hb dread doing the returns so another bug

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
our st has hb dread doing the returns so another bug

HB does the PRs, CB does the KRs. Considering DA kept scoring in the 4th quarter, you were seeing a lot of KRs.

Your CB took all the KRs in the previous game too. Maybe you should just set your depth chart properly?

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
our st has hb dread doing the returns so another bug

Never heard of that bug. Much higher chance you did the depth charts wrong.

I think rage bugs are my favorite kinds of reported bugs.

Originally posted by FairForever
Funny how USC calls himself one of the best coordinators in the game yet has no idea how the depth charts work.
funny how you can tell the bad coordinators as the guys who assume they have all the facts and make statements like that^. anyway players were returning kicks that werent suppose to. still no reason for 10 mins of not seeing them

Originally posted by USC_Trojans
our st has hb dread doing the returns so another bug

Another would assume that the CB issue was a bug, it isn't. It looks like Death is returning punts but not kicks. Lester returned kicks in the first game as well.


http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/215181/73919?player_id=94748

By looking at your Special Teams plays the past 2 games I'd be willing to bet that you didn't redo your Special Teams DC with your new roster. You got blockers try to tackle and defenders trying to block.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans

funny how you can tell the bad coordinators as the guys who assume they have all the facts and make statements like that^. anyway players were returning kicks that werent suppose to. still no reason for 10 mins of not seeing them

You have pretty much everyone here providing evidence you fucked up the depth charts yet you still think you know what you're doing. Amazing really.

Originally posted by USC_Trojans

still no reason for 10 mins of not seeing them

quite blatantly lying. that isn't true no matter how many times you claim it.

really?

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/218034/192980

then we punt on 4th?

no doubt in my mind we would have won this game with chem at 100 for both teams (ex - Our 99 Rec Hands WR caught 1 of 7 targets) Bronx is good, but not 2 undefeated seasons in a row good... a good gameplan will absolutely beat them.

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
really?

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/218034/192980

then we punt on 4th?

no doubt in my mind we would have won this game with chem at 100 for both teams. Bronx is good, but not 2 undefeated seasons in a row good... a good gameplan will absolutely beat them.

Tdiddy, do you ever wonder why people give you so much shit on here?

did you watch the game? watch it, and come back and tell me I'm not 100% spot-on

Originally posted by TDiddy8701
really?

http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/replay/218034/192980

then we punt on 4th?

no doubt in my mind we would have won this game with chem at 100 for both teams

You turned them over on the 1st play from scrimmage after the punt so that punt was essentially a 20 yard pass so neither the fumbled snap or questionable punt is relevant.

one non 50 chem WR and pass CB is absolutely relevant when it's an all-out passing war

I was just giving an exmaple of a play that even ray charles could see chemistry affected

KLs/Dropped passes/not being able to secure are definitely affected by chem, but doesn't show up on the replay like the fumbled snap

Madison beats DA: TDiddy rags on Rob. for using chemistry as an excuse for poor play.
Madison loses to Bronx: TDiddy claims that a won game was lost due to low chemistry.