Originally posted by ColaCock
Originally posted by dviss1
For this reason alone is why Oso shouldn't be #1. Getting those stats against the lower teams... This is another example of people not doing proper research to make their picks.
Listen. I don't know why you are getting frustrated and having a hard time understanding. In the NFL, do they care WHO Peyton Manning threw his touchdowns against? Care who Adrian Peterson rushed against? Does it matter in the NCAA which touchdowns Tim Tebow scored against certain opponents? Do they hold that against them? NO! Why? Because they vote how the hell they want and try to consider who was the best MAINLY by looking at stats and success of the team.
If someone feels like what Oso did was so impressive that he MOST LIKELY could have repeated the same or similar results against stiff competition- fine, let them vote.
Just because people aren't voting for who YOU would, doesn't mean they are wrong for it. People get voted for stupid stuff they don't deserve all the time in these things- it is OPINION. Just like any poll or awards list.
Get over yourself and you MIGHT be able to collect a complete list of awards. Some of you on here amaze me, acting like a bunch of 16 year olds.
Funny what people can get away with saying over the internet.
Bottom line when you go up against a cupcake and get 300 yds 9 TDs, it doesn't make your player look good when you go up against a good team and he gets 20 yards. This has been happening all season. We also talked about how the stats against cupcake teams don't matter.