Did i count it right? Did Alpha/Zeta split the games 8-8 ? 
Flapjack
offline
offline
9 Zeta / 7 Alpha
Nine reasons why Zeta > Alpha
Tallinn Tigers
Bratislava Stachstachers
Minoan Minotaurs
Kharkiv Lo Pans
Vilnius Iron Wolves
WhatsaMatta U Fighting Elk
Ostrava IRONMEN
Morgantown Biscuits
Belarus Death Machine
Nine reasons why Zeta > Alpha
Tallinn Tigers
Bratislava Stachstachers
Minoan Minotaurs
Kharkiv Lo Pans
Vilnius Iron Wolves
WhatsaMatta U Fighting Elk
Ostrava IRONMEN
Morgantown Biscuits
Belarus Death Machine
Last edited Sep 2, 2008 07:58:56
Scyllz
offline
offline
The top 5 rappers in history..
Dylan, Dylan, Dylan, Dylan and Dylan.. CAUSE I SPIT HOT FIRE!
Dylan, Dylan, Dylan, Dylan and Dylan.. CAUSE I SPIT HOT FIRE!
Liltee8869
offline
offline
All I need is 1 for why Alpha is greater. Parity. Our teams at the top are all really close. You guys have a few and past that meh!
slakker381
offline
offline
Originally posted by Scyllz
The top 5 rappers in history..
Dylan, Dylan, Dylan, Dylan and Dylan.. CAUSE I SPIT HOT FIRE!
I need more snare...turn my headset up...uh, uh, I rhyme and I rip..I rip and I rhyme...uh, turn my headset up!
The top 5 rappers in history..
Dylan, Dylan, Dylan, Dylan and Dylan.. CAUSE I SPIT HOT FIRE!
I need more snare...turn my headset up...uh, uh, I rhyme and I rip..I rip and I rhyme...uh, turn my headset up!
kurieg
offline
offline
Originally posted by Liltee8869
All I need is 1 for why Alpha is greater. Parity. Our teams at the top are all really close. You guys have a few and past that meh!
I got 6 reasons why Zeta > Alpha. I single-handedly nearly doubled the sack count on New Davidson. Ya, ya, crappy CPU LOT, but you guys only managed 7 sacks in 15 games.
Survey says Zeta > Alpha.
All I need is 1 for why Alpha is greater. Parity. Our teams at the top are all really close. You guys have a few and past that meh!
I got 6 reasons why Zeta > Alpha. I single-handedly nearly doubled the sack count on New Davidson. Ya, ya, crappy CPU LOT, but you guys only managed 7 sacks in 15 games.
Survey says Zeta > Alpha.
Last edited Sep 2, 2008 11:00:27
mw54finest
offline
offline
I really don't understand this whole Alpha vs. Zeta deal. Suppose Zeta is better than Alpha, what does that accomplish? Only one team will represent each side at the end of the playoffs and winner of that last game is what matters, does it not?
So until that game, I will go with Zeta > Alpha if it satisfies you Zeta guys.
Since Avengers are 1 and 2 against Zeta, Zeta is better right?
So until that game, I will go with Zeta > Alpha if it satisfies you Zeta guys.
Since Avengers are 1 and 2 against Zeta, Zeta is better right?
kurieg
offline
offline
Originally posted by Liltee8869
We only managed 7 sacks? You're crazy!
Survey says.... well, you can guess.
You are right, I am mistaken - the entirety of Alpha managed only 6 sacks against New Brunswick. I somehow mistakenly thought they had given up 13 sacks, not 12.
We only managed 7 sacks? You're crazy!
Survey says.... well, you can guess.
You are right, I am mistaken - the entirety of Alpha managed only 6 sacks against New Brunswick. I somehow mistakenly thought they had given up 13 sacks, not 12.
kurieg
offline
offline
Originally posted by mw54finest
I really don't understand this whole Alpha vs. Zeta deal. Suppose Zeta is better than Alpha, what does that accomplish? Only one team will represent each side at the end of the playoffs and winner of that last game is what matters, does it not?
So until that game, I will go with Zeta > Alpha if it satisfies you Zeta guys.
Since Avengers are 1 and 2 against Zeta, Zeta is better right?
Hi Mw54!
All this nice talk totally takes the fun out of mudslinging
Good luck in the playoffs!
I really don't understand this whole Alpha vs. Zeta deal. Suppose Zeta is better than Alpha, what does that accomplish? Only one team will represent each side at the end of the playoffs and winner of that last game is what matters, does it not?
So until that game, I will go with Zeta > Alpha if it satisfies you Zeta guys.
Since Avengers are 1 and 2 against Zeta, Zeta is better right?
Hi Mw54!
All this nice talk totally takes the fun out of mudslinging
Good luck in the playoffs!
Liltee8869
offline
offline
Originally posted by kurieg
Originally posted by Liltee8869
We only managed 7 sacks? You're crazy!
Survey says.... well, you can guess.
You are right, I am mistaken - the entirety of Alpha managed only 6 sacks against New Brunswick. I somehow mistakenly thought they had given up 13 sacks, not 12.
Doesn't matter, I'd like to show BDM what's up. I think the Demons would win that one. Maybe we can schedule a friendly in the offseason!
Originally posted by Liltee8869
We only managed 7 sacks? You're crazy!
Survey says.... well, you can guess.
You are right, I am mistaken - the entirety of Alpha managed only 6 sacks against New Brunswick. I somehow mistakenly thought they had given up 13 sacks, not 12.
Doesn't matter, I'd like to show BDM what's up. I think the Demons would win that one. Maybe we can schedule a friendly in the offseason!
mw54finest
offline
offline
All right boys, let's all unzip and whip it out and say "Damn, MW! That is huge!!! I lose..."
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
