Warrior General Games

Originally posted by heytheresrich
Consequently, if a team for instance is 6th place on the power rankings but actually lower in the actual conference standings it should mean they are underachieving.

True story. the dragons are 15th in conference standings, but everyone knows we're really the number 1 team in the conference.

Originally posted by ress5609
Originally posted by heytheresrich

Consequently, if a team for instance is 6th place on the power rankings but actually lower in the actual conference standings it should mean they are underachieving.

True story. the dragons are 15th in conference standings, but everyone knows we're really the number 1 team in the conference.

LIES!

LMAO

Originally posted by Viet


LIES!




LOL.

Touche!

Originally posted by heytheresrich
Interesting. So if a team is say 4th place on the power rankings but is actually 2nd place in the league conference standings, does that indirectly indicate that they are overachieving with their players? Consequently, if a team for instance is 6th place on the power rankings but actually lower in the actual conference standings it should mean they are underachieving. This is going off the assumption that higher levels = higher chance of winning.

I think the guy who made this (in USA Pro League) uses the assumption that builds are pretty similar in USA Pro, and that the only real difference over who is better is their level. At the levels that our players are at, it's not really so true. It's just simply based more on the fact that if you have higher level players, your builds should be better. So I guess your comparison of the power rankings to actual records is a pretty good estimate that your players are under preforming, but that's based more on their build quality and not on actual performance.