Warrior General Games

GG's guys. Nice upset by the isotopes, great job.

It appears that the Demolition and Hedgehogs sit alone on top of the west.

It is also worth noting that the Hedgehogs have a game scheduled for tomorrow against the Richey Royals, last seasons western champ, and the team that knocked us out of the season 3 playoffs. It should be fun, and I figure I should give you demolition guys more tape to watch on my team.

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot
Originally posted by morid

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot


Originally posted by morid



Originally posted by kurieg




That's your definition of snooty? I can have the maker of the spreadsheet come and break it down for you?

Snooty is saying my 5-year old could explain it to you.



And I am the Sensitive one.....

Obviously, yes. No way around it. Your extremely defensive and you lash out like a child. Like right there, another comment, your making those comments while your saying you dont do it.Lol
Borderline psychotic.

Never said I don't do it. Stop putting words in my mouth. I do make comments just as you do. We have differing opinions and that's cool.


If thats how you want to look at your theatrics, im okay with that.

Don't really care what you are or are not ok with.

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot
Originally posted by morid

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot


Originally posted by morid



Originally posted by kurieg




That's your definition of snooty? I can have the maker of the spreadsheet come and break it down for you?

Snooty is saying my 5-year old could explain it to you.



And I am the Sensitive one.....

Obviously, yes. No way around it. Your extremely defensive and you lash out like a child. Like right there, another comment, your making those comments while your saying you dont do it.Lol
Borderline psychotic.

Never said I don't do it. Stop putting words in my mouth. I do make comments just as you do. We have differing opinions and that's cool.


If thats how you want to look at your theatrics, im okay with that.

You're calling people borderline psychotic and commenting on their theatrics. This is irony posting, right?

Right?

Since Satchmo does not want to get involved in our little pissing contest, he sent me this:

Originally posted by
The algorithm takes all common data points between two teams (common opponents, common 2nd Gen, common 3rd Gen, etc.). The data points are considered independently to arrive at an offensive rating and defensive rating for each team. These ratings are based solely on scoring and are expressed as a percentage of the norm vs. all opponents. These percentages are then compared to those of the opponent being projected to arrive at a confidence score. While this score is often looked at as a projected score for the game, and has been very successful as such, that's not the intent individually. The cumulative sets of projections and actual scores are used as an estimation of the season PF/PA totals, but individually these are not looked upon as an estimation. They are merely a measure of confidence in the outcome.

I hope that made sense.

Makes sense, yes, wheres the part about criticising people who dont agree to its usefulness?

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot
Makes sense, yes, wheres the part about criticising people who dont agree to its usefulness?

I will add that later!

Thanks for the explanation.


Wiseman, that will be a very interesting scrim. I'm looking forward to seeing the results of that one. Not necessarily to scout as much as to see the outcome. That will be a very good primer to see where your offense and defense stands.

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot
Makes sense, yes, wheres the part about criticising people who dont agree to its usefulness?


Let me get this straight, so it's ok to criticize the spreadsheet (and indirectly, its' author) but it's not ok to criticize the criticizor?

Originally posted by MattMan Firespot
Makes sense, yes, wheres the part about criticising people who dont agree to its usefulness?

Usefulness for what, exactly? Certainly not the particular thing that the author said the model is *not* intended for?

/end thread

Originally posted by rfick
Originally posted by MattMan Firespot

Makes sense, yes, wheres the part about criticising people who dont agree to its usefulness?


Let me get this straight, so it's ok to criticize the spreadsheet (and indirectly, its' author) but it's not ok to criticize the criticizor?


I dont know the author, so how could I have criticised him if I dont know him, its not him I criticise its the spreadhseet you freakin nazi.
What have you done, sat here and watched the conversation waiting for your turn to chime in with the wittiest comment you could think of?

Really, I've never seen a mroe uptight group go and blow somethign out of proportion for no reason. yes I added to it but only when someone started criticizing my team owner for stating his OPINION.

So childish. Even more childish for RFick to come in here when it had absolutely nothing to do with him and throw himself of the middle of it. I would be so embarassed to act the way you guys do.

No class at all.

You're killing me. I simply pointed out that you criticized someone's work and then jumped all over someone else for being critical. The irony was too much. Immature? You mean like calling someone a "freaking nazi"? And what, no one can express their opinions but you? And "come in here when it had absolutely nothing to do with him and throw himself of the middle of it"? Isn't that exactly what you did when you jumped part way through the thread slinging insults? Pearhead asked a question, a few people answered it well, and you waded in with your comments and now you are going back editing them. Furthermore, why must you know someone to criticize them? The irony only grows the more you type.

You have some sort of obsession with the irony idea I mean, is that all you got on that subject or you got some other kind of point to make? Please dont be repetitive, if im going to have my fun with you, i need you to atleast try to be clever.

I'm just glad our team isn't in here adding to it. It's gone on for far too long over me asking for a simple explanation on how the numbers worked for the predicting system. It was finally answered here on page 3. It's a waste of everyone's time to keep this going.

Originally posted by opspearhead
I'm just glad our team isn't in here adding to it. It's gone on for far too long over me asking for a simple explanation on how the numbers worked for the predicting system. It was finally answered here on page 3. It's a waste of everyone's time to keep this going.

I agree