to megaman...I believe we went 2-0 vs. BAMC. What's your point?
kingsolo
offline
offline
I love this thread! 
I think this deserves the top thread of the season award!
On second though... nah, the thread with all the whore talk was the best!
I think this deserves the top thread of the season award!
On second though... nah, the thread with all the whore talk was the best!
Last edited Jul 20, 2008 00:06:33
megaman1337
offline
offline
Nah, that's not quite accurate. You can have 10 1-15 teams in Zeta and have them play 10 better teams in Alpha and it would still skew your results. Who do you think would be more likely to win? The ten 1-15 teams or the ten better teams? That's not too far off of what happened with Aplha playing the Zeta teams this season. Just look at the records of the mid-low level alpha teams compared to who they played in Zeta .
Where it really counts is when you have the powerhouses of both leagues facing off against each other. That happened in week 17 with the Sea Dragons vs. BAMC. The Sea Dragons crushed them. It wasn't even close.
And then MTD hardly pulls out 2 wins vs BATC both times and they still think they are somehow so much better than the Sea Dragons who blew BAMC out? Come on now, let's not fool ourselves here. Let's take a look at what the Sea Dragons and what MTD did to BAMC and compare. If you think the Sea Dragons could put up those kinds of numbers on BAMC, what do you think the Blaze would do to them?
It's no secret that many teams in Zeta wouldn't like thinking about these possibilities and that's exactly my point. Your heads are way too big. Ah well, pride comes before the fall.
.Where it really counts is when you have the powerhouses of both leagues facing off against each other. That happened in week 17 with the Sea Dragons vs. BAMC. The Sea Dragons crushed them. It wasn't even close.
And then MTD hardly pulls out 2 wins vs BATC both times and they still think they are somehow so much better than the Sea Dragons who blew BAMC out? Come on now, let's not fool ourselves here. Let's take a look at what the Sea Dragons and what MTD did to BAMC and compare. If you think the Sea Dragons could put up those kinds of numbers on BAMC, what do you think the Blaze would do to them?
It's no secret that many teams in Zeta wouldn't like thinking about these possibilities and that's exactly my point. Your heads are way too big. Ah well, pride comes before the fall.
Bad-Company
offline
offline
Originally posted by Revelation
Good Luck Melbourne. Your team is good, but is your depth? We will see.
I'd say so...GG.
Good Luck Melbourne. Your team is good, but is your depth? We will see.
I'd say so...GG.
SCACE
offline
offline
Originally posted by Revelation
Good Luck Melbourne. Your team is good, but is your depth? We will see.
Our depth is/was just fine
It was pointed out by Chase (thanks btw) where you had a glaring weakness to one of our glaring strengths, and we were able to take advantage of that today.
But really, this game was another decided on special teams...two forced fumble turnovers on special teams lead to 14 MTD points. Take that away and its a 17-13 game.
I just want to say to the Blaze that you have a very, very solid team in Brisbane, esp. that D-Line...by far the best we've seen all year.
Good luck in AAA#1 Alpha next season, and REV - send me a PM when you are ready.
Good Luck Melbourne. Your team is good, but is your depth? We will see.
Our depth is/was just fine
It was pointed out by Chase (thanks btw
) where you had a glaring weakness to one of our glaring strengths, and we were able to take advantage of that today.But really, this game was another decided on special teams...two forced fumble turnovers on special teams lead to 14 MTD points. Take that away and its a 17-13 game.
I just want to say to the Blaze that you have a very, very solid team in Brisbane, esp. that D-Line...by far the best we've seen all year.
Good luck in AAA#1 Alpha next season, and REV - send me a PM when you are ready.
SCACE
offline
offline
Originally posted by megaman1337
Nah, that's not quite accurate. You can have 10 1-15 teams in Zeta and have them play 10 better teams in Alpha and it would still skew your results. Who do you think would be more likely to win? The ten 1-15 teams or the ten better teams? That's not too far off of what happened with Aplha playing the Zeta teams this season. Just look at the records of the mid-low level alpha teams compared to who they played in Zeta.
Where it really counts is when you have the powerhouses of both leagues facing off against each other. That happened in week 17 with the Sea Dragons vs. BAMC. The Sea Dragons crushed them. It wasn't even close.
And then MTD hardly pulls out 2 wins vs BATC both times and they still think they are somehow so much better than the Sea Dragons who blew BAMC out? Come on now, let's not fool ourselves here. Let's take a look at what the Sea Dragons and what MTD did to BAMC and compare. If you think the Sea Dragons could put up those kinds of numbers on BAMC, what do you think the Blaze would do to them?
It's no secret that many teams in Zeta wouldn't like thinking about these possibilities and that's exactly my point. Your heads are way too big. Ah well, pride comes before the fall.
You have your answer...i mean, if Melbourne could put up those kinds of numbers on Blaze, just imagine what BAMC or Tonga could do them
I don't mind you guys having Alpha pride and our guys over here having Zeta pride, that is part of the fun, but the MTD's are for real and welcome any and all challengers...and we welcome our challenge up in AAA where it will be a whole new ballgame!
Nah, that's not quite accurate. You can have 10 1-15 teams in Zeta and have them play 10 better teams in Alpha and it would still skew your results. Who do you think would be more likely to win? The ten 1-15 teams or the ten better teams? That's not too far off of what happened with Aplha playing the Zeta teams this season. Just look at the records of the mid-low level alpha teams compared to who they played in Zeta
.Where it really counts is when you have the powerhouses of both leagues facing off against each other. That happened in week 17 with the Sea Dragons vs. BAMC. The Sea Dragons crushed them. It wasn't even close.
And then MTD hardly pulls out 2 wins vs BATC both times and they still think they are somehow so much better than the Sea Dragons who blew BAMC out? Come on now, let's not fool ourselves here. Let's take a look at what the Sea Dragons and what MTD did to BAMC and compare. If you think the Sea Dragons could put up those kinds of numbers on BAMC, what do you think the Blaze would do to them?
It's no secret that many teams in Zeta wouldn't like thinking about these possibilities and that's exactly my point. Your heads are way too big. Ah well, pride comes before the fall.
You have your answer...i mean, if Melbourne could put up those kinds of numbers on Blaze, just imagine what BAMC or Tonga could do them
I don't mind you guys having Alpha pride and our guys over here having Zeta pride, that is part of the fun, but the MTD's are for real and welcome any and all challengers...and we welcome our challenge up in AAA where it will be a whole new ballgame!
SCACE
offline
offline
PS Mega....when did 21-7 become hardly pulling out a win and 25-7 become a blowout. Get a clue.
222
offline
offline
MTD Champions! Loving it! Now I have to go shower all of this champagne off!!!
megaman,,,I heard that you can get Blaze Championship hats for real cheap online right now! Better hurry before they get shipped of to Indonesia though.
megaman,,,I heard that you can get Blaze Championship hats for real cheap online right now! Better hurry before they get shipped of to Indonesia though.
SCACE
offline
offline
Originally posted by Veggies
Ah well, coverage just couldn't handle the devils passing game. GG guys.
Thanks Veggies...it was the only glaring weakness on your defense that happened to match up to a big strength of ours.
It was a great game, nothing but respect from me to the Blaze ownership, GM's and team - you guys have a solid squad over there.
Ah well, coverage just couldn't handle the devils passing game. GG guys.
Thanks Veggies...it was the only glaring weakness on your defense that happened to match up to a big strength of ours.
It was a great game, nothing but respect from me to the Blaze ownership, GM's and team - you guys have a solid squad over there.
hendoxps
offline
offline
Originally posted by megaman1337
Nah, that's not quite accurate. You can have 10 1-15 teams in Zeta and have them play 10 better teams in Alpha and it would still skew your results. Who do you think would be more likely to win? The ten 1-15 teams or the ten better teams? That's not too far off of what happened with Aplha playing the Zeta teams this season. Just look at the records of the mid-low level alpha teams compared to who they played in Zeta.
Where it really counts is when you have the powerhouses of both leagues facing off against each other. That happened in week 17 with the Sea Dragons vs. BAMC. The Sea Dragons crushed them. It wasn't even close.
And then MTD hardly pulls out 2 wins vs BATC both times and they still think they are somehow so much better than the Sea Dragons who blew BAMC out? Come on now, let's not fool ourselves here. Let's take a look at what the Sea Dragons and what MTD did to BAMC and compare. If you think the Sea Dragons could put up those kinds of numbers on BAMC, what do you think the Blaze would do to them?
It's no secret that many teams in Zeta wouldn't like thinking about these possibilities and that's exactly my point. Your heads are way too big. Ah well, pride comes before the fall.
you do realise we viewed that sydney game as an experiment or i did at least. it didnt effect us standing wise and i wanted to know what our scheme at the time would do. we learned and that was that. i'm not calling anyone out but we just had a scrimmage against sydney and we ran it up on them, both teams had subs going as well so its just that. anything can happen in this game. but if you think B.A.M.C. can not hang with Blaze or Sydney your posting how high your intellect realy is to the public on here.
Nah, that's not quite accurate. You can have 10 1-15 teams in Zeta and have them play 10 better teams in Alpha and it would still skew your results. Who do you think would be more likely to win? The ten 1-15 teams or the ten better teams? That's not too far off of what happened with Aplha playing the Zeta teams this season. Just look at the records of the mid-low level alpha teams compared to who they played in Zeta
.Where it really counts is when you have the powerhouses of both leagues facing off against each other. That happened in week 17 with the Sea Dragons vs. BAMC. The Sea Dragons crushed them. It wasn't even close.
And then MTD hardly pulls out 2 wins vs BATC both times and they still think they are somehow so much better than the Sea Dragons who blew BAMC out? Come on now, let's not fool ourselves here. Let's take a look at what the Sea Dragons and what MTD did to BAMC and compare. If you think the Sea Dragons could put up those kinds of numbers on BAMC, what do you think the Blaze would do to them?
It's no secret that many teams in Zeta wouldn't like thinking about these possibilities and that's exactly my point. Your heads are way too big. Ah well, pride comes before the fall.
you do realise we viewed that sydney game as an experiment or i did at least. it didnt effect us standing wise and i wanted to know what our scheme at the time would do. we learned and that was that. i'm not calling anyone out but we just had a scrimmage against sydney and we ran it up on them, both teams had subs going as well so its just that. anything can happen in this game. but if you think B.A.M.C. can not hang with Blaze or Sydney your posting how high your intellect realy is to the public on here.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
